Phoebe Dong, the Rancho Cucamonga woman, who with her husband last September was found guilty of operating a “birth tourism” scheme that charged Chinese clients up to $40,000 to help them give birth in the United States and obtain birthright U.S. citizenship for their children, was sentenced Monday to more than 3 years in prison.
Dong and her husband, Michael Liu, were among more than a dozen defendants charged nearly ten years ago when the U.S. Department of Justice during the Obama Administration undertook to prosecute those involved in an elaborate set of arrangements and mechanisms by which woman from foreign countries – the People’s Republic of China, Russia, Nigeria, Taiwan, Korea, Turkey and Brazil – came into the United States while hiding their pregnancies and then gave birth before leaving, conferring U.S. citizenship on their offspring in the process.
The 14th Amendment provides that any child born in the United States is an American citizen. Enterprising foreigners, the largest number being from the People’s Republic of China, have sought to exploit that Constitutional provision by assisting pregnant women, with the most numerous of those again originating in the People’s Republic of China, in coming into the country, generally on tourist visas. Once here, the women are but up in birth houses, which generally consist of large multi-bedroom single family residences or high end apartments, where the women bring their children to term.
According to the U.S. Justice Department, the motivation for these schemes varies. In many cases, those involved are looking to create a better life for their children by having them raised in the United States with the full rights and privileges of American citizenship as well as the prospect of ultimately obtaining a U.S. college education. An added bonus to this is that the women and their husbands can then use the citizenship of their child to obtain for themselves permanent U.S. residency. Another reason is the restrictions that were placed on Chinese citizens more than a generation ago, an effort by the government to control population growth in what was then the world’s most populous country by prohibiting couples from having more than a single child. Having a child in the United States is a way to get around that limitation. It has also been suggested that in some cases, birth tourism involving those from the People’s Republic of China is a form, or an auxiliary element, of espionage, as the family around a child born in the United States with full citizenship can serve as a “sleeper” unit, and can remain dormant in the United States for upwards of a generation, melding into American society, at the ready to be called into action by the Communist Chinese government at a time of its choosing.
At their four-day trial in September, Dong, who is also known as Jing Dong, (董晶), and her husband, also known as Michael Wei Yueh Liu (刘维岳), were found guilty of one count of conspiracy and 10 counts of international money laundering.
According to evidence presented by prosecutors, beginning no later than January 2012 and at least until March 2015, Liu, 59, and Dong, 47, ran a maternity house in Rancho Cucamonga and rented apartment units in Southern California to provide short-term housing and provide other services to pregnant women from China who traveled to the United States. Typically, within one or two months after giving birth, the women returned to China.
Among the services Liu and Dong provided was assistance in obtaining visas to enter the United States, customs entry guidance, housing, and transportation in the United States, as well as assistance applying for U.S. legal documents for the children of their customers.
Liu and Dong advised their customers on how to hide their pregnancies from the immigration authorities. Prosecutors convincingly argued at trial that Liu and Dong also knew or deliberately avoided learning that their customers made factual and material misrepresentations on their visa applications submitted to immigration authorities to enter the U.S.
Generally, their customers’ visa applications falsely stated that the purpose of the trip to the United States was for tourism, when it was to give birth, and the length of the stay was days or weeks, when it was in fact months. The visas also misstated the location where the customers intended to stay, which was the defendants’ maternity hotel.
Liu and Dong or their agents also advised their customers to fly to ports of entry where there was what was perceived to be less customs scrutiny, such as Hawaii, before flying to Los Angeles; to wear loose fitting clothing; to favor certain lines at customs manned by less strict agents; and on how to answer customs officials’ questions.
Liu and Dong received money from overseas and used that money to promote their scheme.
United States District Judge R. Gary Klausner on December 9, 2024 sentenced Liu to 41 months in prison. On January 31, Judge Klausner gave Dong a matching 41-month sentence and ordered her immediately taken into custody from his federal court in Los Angeles. Judge Klausner said he had reduced the sentences meted out to the couple, who had separated by the time of their trial last year, from the five-year maximum in deference to their 13-year-old son.
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Gonorrhea At Record Levels
Prado East Of Chino
Toast
Concern Aggressive “Security” Measures Have Skewed Homeless Survey Numbers Downward
January 31 SBC Sentinel Legal Notices
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
CASE NUMBER CIVBA 2400829
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: Petitioner: DESTINY VICTORIA LIMAS filed with this court for a decree changing names as follows:
AURELIO MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ to AURELIO ARTURO ORTEGA
THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
Notice of Hearing:
Date: 02/04/2025, Time: 01:30 PM, Department: B1
The address of the court is Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, Barstow Courthouse, 25 E. Mountain View Street, Barstow, CA 92311,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel in San Bernardino County California, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing of the petition.
Dated: 12/17/2024
Judge of the Superior Court: James R. Baxter
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 10, 17, 24 & 31, 2025.
FBN 20240010807
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
JC3 HOLDINGS 4152 E. AXIS PRIVADO, 101 ONTARIO, CA 91764: KRISTINE S NAVARRETE
Business Mailing Address: 1602 JEDEDIAH PL UPLAND, CA 91784
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: OCTOBER 10, 2024.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ KRISTINE S NAVARRETE, Owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 11/27/2024
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K5079
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 10, 17, 24 & 31, 2025.
Read The January 24 Sentinel Here
Barstow Council Suspends Police Chief At His 1-Year Mark As Acting City Manager
Just days after the one-year anniversary of what has been perhaps the most remarkable progression of his career, Barstow Police Chief Andrew Espinoza, Jr this week was placed on administrative leave from his interim city manager position.
On January 16, 2024, the Barstow City Council as it was then composed voted to appoint Espinoza, who held the title of police chief and public safety director, to the acting city manager position in the aftermath of Willie Hopkins’ departure to accept the position of city manager in Compton. At that point, Espinoza had been the police chief for two-and-a-half years and had been with the police department for 25 years, having begun his law enforcement career in Barstow in 1999 after graduating from the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department 135th Academy Session.
In appointing Espinoza to what was generally thought would be a position of short duration, the city council bypassed Assistant City Manager Kody Tompkins. Continue reading
Some Local Politicians Are More & Some Are Less Than Forgiving And Understanding Of SCE’s Line Shut-Offs
Some two dozen San Bernardino County communities sustained power outages during the severe windstorms of earlier this month which resulted in catastrophic fires of historic proportion in the Los Angeles cities and communities of Pacific Palisades, Altadena and Eaton Canyon.
Southern California Edison, the utility company which supplies electricity to those areas of Southern California not serviced by San Diego Gas & Electric, the City of Needles, the City of Colton, the City of Riverside, the City of Anaheim and the Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, engaged in sporadic, varied and intermittent shut offs as part of what the company refers to as its public safety power shutoff program.
Those deliberate outages are intended to prevent the sparking of fires by damaged or downed power lines in an area where extremely dry vegetation acts as kindling and prevailing meteorologic conditions will push the fire itself or embers in multiple directions, causing immediate and widespread migration of the flames.
In San Bernardino County, the public safety power shutoff program extended into Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, Rosena Ranch, Rialto, San Bernardino, Redlands, Grand Terrace, Yucaipa, Oak Glen, Wildwood Canyon, along Mill Creek, Angeles Oaks, Smiley Park, Green Valley Lake, Running Springs, Lake Arrowhead, along Shake Creek, Cedar Glen, Blue Jay, Crestline, Cedar Pines Park, Summit Terrace, Lake Silverwood, north of Baldy Village, in Wrightwood, in Deer Haven between Phelan and Pinon Hills north of Wildhorse Canyon and in Chino Hills.
Federal Judge Puts California Officials’ Disallowance Of Parent Notification Into Doubt
A federal judge has entered a ruling that brings into question whether California state law and the efforts by Governor Gavin Newsom, California Attorney General Rob Bonta and California Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond prohibiting teachers and other school district officials from informing parents when their children are assuming a gender identification at school that is different from their birth or biological gender will pass constitutional muster.
The ruling by Federal District Court Judge for the Southern District of California Roger Benitez that was entered on January 7 in a fundamental way boosts the prospects of the Chino Valley Unified School District in its legal battle with Bonta over a policy the district put in place in the Summer of 2023 mandating that district teachers notify parents when their children are manifesting gender incongruence, i.e., assuming a gender different from the one assigned them at birth.
The board voted 4-to-1 to adopt that policy, doing so over the objections of both Thurmond and Bonta. The state schools superintendent and the state attorney general have both consistently asserted that students have privacy rights which allow them to prevent their parents from knowing the identity they assume in a public school setting. Because some parents are unaccepting of any deviation from heterosexuality on the part of their offspring and some of those might or would engage in physical, psychological or emotional abuse of their children upon learning of their gender incongruence, Bonta and Thurmond maintain that revealing to parents how their children are comporting themselves at school, if that behavior includes a reidentification of gender, would be, in Bonta’s words, “discriminatory and downright dangerous.” Asserting that “nearly half of students who identify as being LBGTQ+ [lesbian, bisexual, gay, transsexual, queer plus other non-heterosexual orientations] are considering suicide,” Thurmond suggested that students alone had the right to determine when and to whom they were to disclose their gender reidentification. Continue reading