By Mark Gutglueck
In a move deemed favorable by those in his personal circle, among his professional associates and his supporters and viewed with alarm by some of his colleagues and political reformers, Councilman John Echevarria is going to run for Colton Mayor in this year’s election.
Echevarria, who was born and raised in San Bernardino, went into a career in law enforcement, starting with the Upland Police Department in 1999, the same year he moved to Colton. In 2002, he made a lateral transfer to the San Bernardino Police Department. In November 2020, a little more than two years after he had been promoted to sergeant with the SBPD, he was elected as Colton’s District 5 city council representative.
At that time, the Colton City Council, led by a mayor elected at large, consisted of six members representing six districts within the 16.06-square mile city,  That was set to change, hovever.
In 2018, Colton’s voters, with 5,321 in favor and 4,469 opposed, had passed  Measure R, which called for reducing the seven-member mayor and council unit from a mayor elected at large and six council members elected by the constituents in a half dozen districts to a council consisting of an at-large mayor and four council members from as many districts.
n accordance with the terms of Measure R, in the November 2020 election, districts 3, 5 and 6 were up for election, but only for 2-year terms. Districts 1, 2, and 4 were not up for election in 2020. In the November 2022 election, all districts in Colton were contested, with the new districts 3 and 4 being conducted with 4-years at stake and districts 1 and 2 involving 2-year terms.
The neighborhood in which Echevarria resided, which had been in District 5, was contained within District 4, In 2022, Echevarria was retained on the council, this time representing District 4. Continue reading →

Thirty months in the coming, the controlling right-wing faction on the Chino Valley Unified School District was vindicated on Monday by the U.S. Supreme Court, which gave strong indication it will side with the district against the virtual monolith of California’s state government and its public education system with regard to the question of minor student privacy vs. parental rights.
It was Chino Valley Unified School District – or more accurately four of its five board members – who led the way in challenging the “progressive” orthodoxy that had been adopted by virtually every one of the State of California’s 1,015 school districts which held that students who at school present themselves as being of a gender different from that one imputed to them at birth are entitled to prevent their parents or legal guardians from knowing about that transition if that is their choice.
A surprisingly well kept secret was that for several years schools furnished students requiring them a “changing room,” an on-campus facility in which a student who had departed from home wearing clothes traditionally associated with his or her biological gender could change into clothes which by current stylistic and fashion trends are identified with the opposite gender and where, at the end of the school day, the student could change back into the clothes he or she was wearing upon leaving home that morning. Moreover, schools and teachers in California were required to treat transgender students according to their gender identity, addressing those students while on campus and in the classroom by the name and pronouns – she or he, him or her – name each student specified. Further, while teachers were called upon to use the names and pronouns of the student’s choosing or preference in daily school room settings, they were required, when meeting in person with the parents of a transgender student during back-to-school nights or parent-teacher conferences or in any written communications with the parents or their guardians to refer to the students by the names given to them by their parents and make no mention of the student’s change in gender identity on campus. Continue reading →

U.S District Judge Jesus Bernal may decide as early as Monday, March 9 whether to dismiss a lawsuit brought by a group of environmentalists aimed at protecting the ecology of a specific canyon near the top of the San Bernardino Mountains by preventing water originating at an elevation roughly a mile above sea level from being diverted into a pipeline to a bottling water operation collection site in the foothills above the City of San Bernardino.
Almost five years ago, on April 23, 2021, the California State Water Resources Control Board issued a tentative order to the bottler of Arrowhead Spring Water to discontinue diverting water from Strawberry Canyon at 5,200-foot to 5,600-foot elevation in the San Bernardino Mountains for use in its Arrowhead Spring Water bottling operation.
After much back and forth between the Water Resources Control Board, including extensive hearings which took place between August 2021 and July 2023, in which hydrological, biological and legal experts representing both sides testified, in September 2023 that cease and desist order was finalized against the bottler, BlueTriton Brands.
The U.S. Forest Service was responsible for the management of the property in Strawberry Canyon, insofar as it is federal land within the San Bernardino National Forest.. When the United States Forest Service failed to follow its own policies and regulations for issuing special use permits and did not ensure that the Water Resources Control Board’s order was enforced, the Save Our Forest Association in June 2024 sued the US Forest Service in an effort to force it to prevent the company from drafting any water from that mountain source. Continue reading →

Despite the City of Yucaipa reaping nearly a third more in sales tax income than it previously anticipated bringing in as a result of the passage of Measure S in 2024, the city’s financial picture has only marginally approved, Yucaipa Finance Director Phil White told the city council during a mid-year budget review at the February 23 city council meeting.
According to graphs and charts and a verbal summary that White provided, at the beginning of the fiscal year in July, it was projected that the city would see $43.912, 589 in revenues over the course of 2025-26 and that there would be expenditures of $22,195,396 over the same period. The city handles its general fund and public safety fund on separate ledgers, even though money from the general fund is utilized to make up for the income to cost differential that is an institutional reality in Yucaipa in terms of its public safety operation. Over the same 12-month period, according to White, in the city’s public safety fund, $6,738,000 in revenue was anticipated and $30,437,687 in expenditures were expected to to cover the cost of its law enforcement service contract with the sheriff’s department and pay for fire protection service from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection over the course of July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026, as well as covering the city’s provision of paramedic service and code enforcement. Continue reading →

The third known death in slightly over five months at the Adelanto Detention Center, operated for the U.S. Department of Immigration and Customes Enforcement by the GEO Group, occurred on February 27
The recent spate of deaths there, taking place during the stepped-up deportation effort initiated by the Donald Trump Administration last year, closely approaches a match with what occurred at the facility in 2017, the first year of President Trump’s first term.
The most recent death was that of Alberto Gutiérrez Reyes, who died at the Victor Valley Global Medical Center in the city of Victorville at 12:58 a.m., less than hour after midnight on Friday, February 27. He had been transported there the previous day from the Adelanto Detention Center after collapsing and losing consciousness. hours earlier in the hospital where he was transferred after losing consciousness at the Adelanto Detention Center.
“My husband died due to medical negligence. For days he was asking for help and they never paid any attention to him,” said Martinez, her voice breaking.
Gutiérrez, born in Veracruz, Mexico, emigrated to the United States in 2001, and had never registered with the U.S. government as a tourist or alien employed in the country. He had no visa, no work permit nor a green card. He had lived primarily in the Los Angeles area, working under the table and undetected by authorities in the construction industry. Continue reading →

After having approved the payment of $3.95 million to the law firm of Miller Barondess $3,950,000 over the last two-and-a-half years, the board of supervisors is set to approve at is meeting next Tuesday providing the law firm with another $1.45 million in a gamble to see if a credible defense can be made of the county’s Department of Children and Family Services, which is accused of allowing foster children in the county to have been abused, mistreated or neglected.
Those knowledgeable about the matter, which has manifested in a class action lawsuit, titled Gary G., et al v. Gavin Newson, et al, say former County Counsel Tom Bunton and current County Counsel Laura Feingold have consistently missed an opportunity to cut an exit for the county by making realistic concessions with regard to the county’s culpability and simultaneously standing down the inflated and spurious elements of the litigation to arrive at a settlement. That route would likely have brought the matter to a close for less than the $5.4 million in legal fees the county is to pay out in legal fees alone, they say, while the prospect of the county yet being on the hook for millions of more dollars when the case goes to trial continues.
On May 30, 2023, San Bernardino County was served with the lawsuit, litigation challenging certain California and San Bernardino County policies and procedures controlling the care of foster children.
Proposed as a class action lawsuit by the New York-based public interest group A Better Childhood, it currently involves 11 children as plaintiffs while purposed to be extended “on behalf of all others similarly situated.” Plaintiffs in the complaint have been changed to pseudonyms to maintain the children’s anonymity. Continue reading →

SUMMONS – (FAMILY LAW)
NOTICE TO RESPONDENT (AVISO AL DEMANDADO): WILLIAM E McCREE
YOU HAVE BEEN SUED.
Read the information below and on the next page. Lo han demandado. Lea la informacion a continuacion y en la pagina siguiente.
PETITIONER’S NAME IS (Nombre del demandante): TAMIYA AYELEYABRAMS AFRIFA
CASE NUMBER FAMSB2507100
You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this Summons and Petition are served on you to file a Response (Form FL-120) at the court and have a copy served on the petitioner. A letter or phone call will not protect you. If you do not file your Response on time, the court may make orders affecting your marriage or domestic partnership, your property, and custody of your children. You may be ordered to pay support and attorney fees and costs. For legal advice, contact a lawyer immediately. Get help finding a lawyer at the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.cagov/selfhelp), at the California Legal Services Website (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), or by contacting your local county bar association.
Tiene 30 DIAS DE CALENDARIO después de haber recibido la entrega legal de esta Citacion y Peticion para presentar una Respuesta (formulario FL-120) ante la corte y efectuar la entrega legal de una copia al demandante. Una carta o liamada telefonica o una audiencia de la corte no basta para protegerio. Si no presenta su Respuesta a tiemp, la corte puede dar ordenes que afecten su matrimonio o pareja de heco, sus bienes y la custodia de sus hijos. La corte tambien le puede ordenar que pague manutencion, y honorarios y costos legales. Para asesoramiento legal, pongase en contacto de inmediato con un abogado. Puede obtener informacion para encontrar un abogado en el Contro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov), en el sitio web de los Servicios Legales de California (www.lahelpca.org) o poniendose en contacto con el colegio de abodgados de su condado.
NOTICE – Restraining orders on page 2: These restraining orders are effective against both spouses or domestic partners until the petition is dismissed, a judgment is entered, or the court makes further orders. They are enforceable anywhere in California by any law enforcement office who has received or seen a copy of them.
AVISO – Las ordenes de restriction se encuentran en la pagina 2 : Las ordenes de restriccion estan en vigencia en cuanto a ambos conyuges o miembros de la pareja de hecho hasta que se despida la peticion, se emita un fallo o la corte de otras ordenes. Cualquier agencia del orden publico que haya rocibido o visto una copia de estas ordenes puede hacerlas acatar en cualquier lugar de California.
FEE WAIVER : If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the clerk for a fee waiver form. The court may order you to pay back all or part of the fees and costs that the court waived for you or the other party.
Exencion de cuotas : Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentacion, pida al secretario un formulario de execion de cuotas. La corte puede ordenar que ested pague, ya sea en parte o por completo, las cuotas y costos de la corte previamente exentos a peticion de usted o de la otra parte.
The name and address of the court is: (El nombre y dirrecion de la corte son):
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
351 N ARROWHEAD AVE
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92415
The name, address and telephone number of petitioner’s attorney, or petitioner without an attorney, are: (El nombre, direccion y numero de telefono del abogado del demandante, o del demendante si no tiene abogado, son):
TAMIYA AYELEYABRAMS AFRIFA
16907 ORANGEWAY #208
FONTANA, CA 92335
(909) 676-7309
Filed: OCTOBER 20, 2025 by Daisy Albiter, Deputy clerk (Asistente) for Clerk of the Court (Secretario)
STANDARD FAMILY LAW RESTRAINING ORDERS Starting immediately, you and your spouse or domestic partner are restrained from: 1. removing the minor children of the parties from the state or applying for a new or replacement passport for those minor children without the prior written consent of the other party or an order of the court; 2. cashing, borrowing against, canceling, transferring, disposing of, or changing the beneficiaries of any insurance or other coverage, including life, health, automobile, and disability, held for the benefit of the parties and their minor children; 3. transferring, encumbering, hypothecating, concealing, or in any way disposing of any property, real or personal, whether community, quasi-community, or separate, without the written consent of the other party or an order of the court, except in the usual course of business or for the necessities of life; and 4. creating a nonprobate transfer or modifying a nonprobate transfer in a manner that affects the disposition of property subject to the transfer, without the written consent of the other party or an order of the court. Before revocation of a nonprobate transfer can take effect or a right of survivorship to property can be eliminated, notice of the change must be filed and served on the other party. You must notify each other of any proposed extraordinary expenditures at least five business days prior to incurring these extraordinary expenditures and account to the court for all extraordinary expenditures made after these restraining orders are effective. However, you may use community property, quasi-community property, or your own separate property to pay an attorney to help you or to pay court costs.
ÓRDENES DE RESTRICCIÓN ESTÁNDAR DE DERECHO FAMILIAR
En forma inmediata, usted y su cónyuge o pareja de hecho tienen prohibido: 1. llevarse del estado de California a los hijos menores de las partes, o solicitar un pasaporte nuevo o de repuesto para los hijos menores, sin el consentimiento previo por escrito de la otra parte o sin una orden de la corte; 2. cobrar, pedir prestado, cancelar, transferir, deshacerse o cambiar el nombre de los beneficiarios de cualquier seguro u otro tipo de cobertura, como de vida, salud, vehículo y discapacidad, que tenga como beneficiario(s) a las partes y su(s) hijo(s) menor(es); 3. transferir, gravar, hipotecar, ocultar o deshacerse de cualquier manera de cualquier propiedad, inmueble o personal, ya sea comunitaria, cuasicomunitaria o separada, sin el consentimiento escrito de la otra parte o una orden de la corte, excepto en el curso habitual de actividades personales y comerciales o para satisfacer las necesidades de la vida; y 4. crear o modificar una transferencia no testamentaria de manera que afecte la asignación de una propiedad sujeta a transferencia, sin el consentimiento por escrito de la otra parte o una orden de la corte. Antes de que se pueda eliminar la revocación de una transferencia no testamentaria, se debe presentar ante la corte un aviso del cambio y hacer una entrega legal de dicho aviso a la otra parte. Cada parte tiene que notificar a la otra sobre cualquier gasto extraordinario propuesto por lo menos cinco días hábiles antes de realizarlo, y rendir cuenta a la corte de todos los gastos extraordinarios realizados después de que estas órdenes de restricción hayan entrado en vigencia. No obstante, puede usar propiedad comunitaria, cuasicomunitaria o suya separada para pagar a un abogado que lo ayude o para pagar los costos de la corte.
NOTICE—ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HEALTH INSURANCE: Do you or someone in your household need affordable health insurance? If so, you should apply for Covered California. Covered California can help reduce the cost you pay towards high quality affordable health care. For more information, visit www.coveredca.com. Or call Covered California at 1-800-300-1506
AVISO—ACCESO A SEGURO DE SALUD MÁS ECONÓMICO: ¿Necesita seguro de salud a un costo asequible, ya sea para usted o alguien en su hogar? Si es así, puede presentar una solicitud con Covered California. Covered California lo puede ayudar a reducir el costo que paga por seguro de salud asequible y de alta calidad. Para obtener más información, visite www.coveredca.com. O llame a Covered California al 1-800-300-0213
WARNING—IMPORTANT INFORMATION California law provides that, for purposes of division of property upon dissolution of a marriage or domestic partnership or upon legal separation, property acquired by the parties during marriage or domestic partnership in joint form is presumed to be community property. If either party to this action should die before the jointly held community property is divided, the language in the deed that characterizes how title is held (i.e., joint tenancy, tenants in common, or community property) will be controlling, and not the community property presumption. You should consult your attorney if you want the community property presumption to be written into the recorded title to the property.
ADVERTENCIA—IMFORMACIÓN IMPORTANTE De acuerdo a la ley de California, las propiedades adquiridas por las partes durante su matrimonio o pareja de hecho en forma conjunta se consideran propiedad comunitaria para fines de la división de bienes que ocurre cuando se produce una disolución o separación legal del matrimonio o pareja de hecho. Si cualquiera de las partes de este caso llega a fallecer antes de que se divida la propiedad comunitaria de tenencia conjunta, el destino de la misma quedará determinado por las cláusulas de la escritura correspondiente que describen su tenencia (por ej., tenencia conjunta, tenencia en común o propiedad comunitaria) y no por la presunción de propiedad comunitaria. Si quiere que la presunción comunitaria quede registrada en la escritura de la propiedad, debería consultar con un abogado.
Published in The San Bernardino County Sentinel on February 13, 20 & 27 and March 6, 2026.

Continue reading →

* Legal Notices submitted for the March 6 edition received by 8 p.m. Thursday, March 5. There may be additional new notices that will appear in the Sentinel submitted the morning of March 6 before the noon deadline.

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: JANE ELLEN CUSHING
CASE NO. PROVA2600150
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of JANE ELLEN CUSHING:
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by P JANE ELLEN CUSHING in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that JANE ELLEN CUSHING be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held in Dept. F-1 at 9:00 a.m. on April 11, 2026
San Bernardino County Superior Court Fontana District
Department F1 – Fontana
17780 Arrow Boulevard
Fontana, CA 92335
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner Paul D. Cushing:
Jeff W. LeBlanc – SBN 253200
Anderson & LeBlanc APLC
123 E. 9th Street, Suite 105
Upland, CA 91786
Telephone No: (909) 949-2226
lawoffice@andersonleblanc.com
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on March 6, 13 & 20, 2026.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
CASE NUMBER CIVSB2604242
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: Petitioner TAWNI DANIELLE FLOT-WILLIAMS filed with this court for a decree changing names as follows:
TAWNI DANIELLE FLOT-WILLIAMS to TAWNI DANIELLE WILLIAMS
THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
Notice of Hearing:
Date: April 13, 2026 Time: 8:30 AM, Department: S27
The address of the court is Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino District-Civil Division, 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be published in the SAN Bernardino County Sentinel in San Bernardino County California, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing of the petition.
Dated: 2/27/2026
Judge of the Superior Court: Gilbert G. Ochoa
By Alexis Camacho, Deputy Court Clerk
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on March 6, 13, 20 & 27, 2026.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
CASE NUMBER CIVSB2604252
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: Petitioner TRENTON LOUIS ALLMANG filed with this court for a decree changing names as follows:
TRENTON LOUIS ALLMANG to TRENTON LOUIS ALLMANG-WILDER
THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
Notice of Hearing:
Date: April 13, 2026 Time: 8:30 AM, Department: S28
The address of the court is Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino District-Civil Division, 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be published in the SAN Bernardino County Sentinel in San Bernardino County California, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing of the petition.
Dated: 2/27/2026
Judge of the Superior Court: Gilbert G. Ochoa
By Alexis Camacho, Deputy Court Clerk
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on March 6, 13, 20 & 27, 2026.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
CASE NUMBER CIVSB2604720
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: Petitioner ELAINE CROSBY filed with this court for a decree changing names as follows:
ELAINE CROSBY to LOVELY DAY
THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
Notice of Hearing:
Date: April 20, 2026 Time: 9:00 AM, Department: S23
The address of the court is Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino District-Civil Division, 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be published in the SAN Bernardino County Sentinel in San Bernardino County California, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing of the petition.
Dated: 3/04/2026
Judge of the Superior Court: Gilbert G. Ochoa
By Kaliska Montecue-Castro, Deputy Court Clerk
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on March 6, 13, 20 & 27, 2026.

FBN20260001208
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
OW WOW BALLOONS 6053 LINDA VISTA CT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739: ZHEN WANG
Business Mailing Address: 6053 LINDA VISTA CT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ ZHEN WANG, Owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 02/18/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K9236
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on March 6, 13, 20 & 27, 2026.

FBN20260001531
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
SUNRIZE OUTLET 8673A BASELINE RD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730: BASELINE EXPRESS LLC 8663 BASELINE RD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
Business Mailing Address: 8663 BASELINE RD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY registered with the State of California.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: 2/26/2026.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ MICHAEL A. COBB, President
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 02/27/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy J9535
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on March 6, 13, 20 & 27, 2026.

FBN20260000551
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
PRUDENT PSYCHIATRY NURSING CORP 2947 S VINEYARD AVE ONTARIO, CA 91761: PRUDENT PSYCHIATRY NURSING CORP 2947 S VINEYARD AVE ONTARIO, CA 91762
Business Mailing Address: 2947 S VINEYARD AVE ONTARIO, CA 91761
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION registered with the State of California under the number B20250430563
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: January 13, 2026.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ FELISTA ANUGOM, CEO
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 01/26/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy J1808
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on March 6, 13, 20 & 27, 2026.

FBN20260000439
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
NET PARTS 19184 SANTA ANA BLOOMINGTON, CA 92316: ROARING 20’S FAMILY PIZZA PARLORS, INC. 1411 E WASHINGTON ST COLTON, CA 92324
Business Mailing Address: 19184 SANTA ANA BLOOMINGTON, CA 92316
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION registered with the State of California.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: January 2, 1976.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ GARY GROSSICH, President
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 01/22/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K1583
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on March 6, 13, 20 & 27, 2026.

FBN20260001028
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
DREAM KEY 4 HOME 7544 PURPLE SAGE CIRCLE FONTANA, CA 92336: DARIO A RODRIGUEZ
Business Mailing Address: 7544 PURPLE SAGE CIRCLE FONTANA, CA 92336
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: February 10. 2026.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ DARIO RODRIGUEZ, Owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 02/10/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K5079
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on March 6, 13, 20 & 27, 2026.

FBN20260000860
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
K&Z HOME SWEET HOME 3390 ORGANDY LN CHINO HILLS, CA 91709: RONELLA M CARTER
Business Mailing Address: 14875 SUZANNE DR FONTANA, CA, 92337
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: January 27. 2026.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ RONELLA M CARTER, Owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 02/03/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K1583
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on March 6, 13, 20 & 27, 2026.