Enamorado, More Focused On A Social Statement Than Avoiding Prison, Jettisons Rosenberg For Alimouri

By Mark Gutglueck
Edin Alex Enamorado, the leader of his eponymous activist group and the last of what were originally eight defendants facing charges growing out of three incidents among dozens in which what the perpetrators maintained were efforts to stand up for the rights of street vendors and which prosecutors allege were out-and-out assaults, has relieved the attorney who previously represented him, Nicholas Rosenberg, and has substituted in Damon Alimouri, an attorney who was able to get one of Enamorado’s codefendants a relatively light sentence through a plea bargain.
What remains to be seen is whether Alimouri will be able to argue his latest client’s innocence effectively to a jury or convince Enamorado that his wisest course of action is to give up on fighting the totality of the charges against him and accept a plea deal.
Such a plea deal may require that Enamorado, a native of Guatemala, accept deportation.
Having grown up on the streets of Cudahy after his parents emigrated to the United States when he was an infant, Enamorado engaged in gang activity as a youth and accumulated a string of convictions, including a felony before experiencing the death of his girlfriend at the hand of other gang members. That convinced Enamorado to turn his life around, he claims, and he for the last several years has been dedicated to assisting the downtrodden, in particular immigrant Latinos such as himself, who have been reduced to engaging in street and sidewalk vending to survive in the white capitalist culture of California.
His mission is to prevent authorities and bigoted Anglos from harassing those street and sidewalk vendors as they ply their trade.
In doing so, Edin Enamorado has invited others, people who are essentially his followers, to assist him in confronting those who do not treat vendors with dignity. From that point forward, the Enamorados were on a crusade for social justice.
That is what he and Stephanie Amésquita, 34 of San Bernardino; Vanessa Carrasco, 41 of Ontario; Wendy Luján, 41 of Upland; David Chávez, 28 of Riverside; Edwin Peña, 27 of Los Angeles and Fernando Lopez, 45 of Los Angeles, were doing over the Labor Day weekend 2023 on September 3, when they went to the El Super Market in Pomona to confront a security guard who worked at that store who had, in Enamorado’s view, proven too confrontational with a food vendor who had set up his operation on the El Super premises. The group confronted the security guard, pepper-sprayed him and then followed him into the store, where security cameras captured images of Enamorado and some of the other Enamorados punching and kicking the security guard, who was blinded by the pepper spray and ultimately knocked to the ground.
Subsequently that day, after Luján, who is variously described as Enamorado’s girlfriend, wife or companion, was arrested as a consequence of the contretemps between the security guard and the Enamorados at the El Super and on its grounds, the group headed to the Pomona Police headquarters to attempt to free her. While they were there, a resident of Pomona had also come to the police department headquarters in the Pomona civic plaza to make a complaint on an unrelated matter. Apparently unrecognized by all or most of those involved was that the police headquarters was closed because for the Labor Day holiday. When the Pomona resident could not get inside the entrance to the police department to file his complaint, he erroneously interpreted the presence of the Enamorados milling about the front of the police department to be the reason he could not make his complaint. Words were exchanged and the man threw an empty Gatorade bottle at some of the Enamorados before getting into his vehicle and driving off. Either ascertaining where he lived by some means or following him to his home, one or two of the Enamorados and then a contingent of ten or eleven of them arrived at his residence where they confronted him. After Enamorado challenged him to a fight, the man was forced to his knees, where he groveled before his tormentors, pleading with them not to harm him.
Further threats to harm John Doe 2 were made, capped by Carrasco implying that they could have easily killed him. “We let you live, homey,” she said.
Three weeks later, on September 24, Edin Enamorado along with Amésquita, Vanessa Carrasco, Luján, Chávez, Peña and Fernando Lopez, , this time joined by another member in good standing of the Enamorados, Gullit Eder “Jaguar” Acevedo, sojourned to Victorville, near the Victorville Sheriff’s Station on Amargosa Road near Palmdale Road to protest an incident that had occurred less than two days earlier, September 22, in the parking lot outside Ray Moore Stadium in the immediate aftermath of a football game between Victor Valley and Big Bear high schools when San Bernardino County he evening of September 22 when Sheriff’s Deputy Starsun Fincel was videotaped slamming a 16-year-old girl, Faith Jeffers, a student at Victor Valley High, as the deputy and one of his colleagues sought to break up a fight that had broken out between Jeffers and another girl.
With his trademark bullhorn in hand, Edin Enamorado led a party of roughly 40 Enamorados, most of them from lower San Bernardino County and Los Angeles County, as they joined with an equal or greater number of protesters from the High Desert, several of them carrying placards calling for justice for Jeffers, as they paraded along the highly visible stretch of Palmdale Road between Amargosa Road and McArt Road. As Enamorado was exhorting the crowd to demand the deputy’s firing and prosecution, a husband and wife who had just had their car, a Hyundai, cleaned at the car wash proximate to the sheriff’s station, were attempting to exit onto Palmdale Avenue. The parade of protesting Enamorados moving along the sidewalk and within the gutter of Palmdale Avenue together with the traffic on Palmdale made doing so impossible. Initially, the occupants of the Hyundai exhibited patience, but after more than two minutes, the woman, who was driving, sounded the Hyundai’s horn. This had no appreciable impact on the protesters, who continued to file in front of the car, such that the driver could not move the car forward without running into and possibly injuring one or more of the protesters. A further wait ensued, at which point the woman sounded the horn once more and the man opened the door on the passenger’s side of the car. As the man emerged, Enamorado, making use of his bullhorn, accused him of hitting a woman by opening his car door into her, doing so in rather derogatory terms, including referring to the man as a “bitch.” One, then two, and then a third Enamorado began to rain blows on the man, who attempted to defend himself while he was angled away from the car and then knocked to the ground. As he attempted to get to his feet, he was pepper sprayed.
The man succeeded in getting up but as he was staggering, he was knocked to the ground once more and kicked while he was down. After the man was pepper sprayed and on the ground for the second time, Edin Enamorado can be heard repeatedly remarking, “That’s what he gets.”
Several sheriff’s deputies, who had previously been monitoring the protest from the back parking lot of the sheriff’s station, at that point swung into action. They arrested Luján, Chávez and two others Victor Alba, 30, of Victorville, and another Enamorado, Wayne Freeman, 36, of Moreno Valley, on suspicion of obstructing a peace officer, battery and unlawful assembly.
Edin Enamorado, who celebrates his activism on multiple social media accounts, routinely made a practice of using his own cellphone as well as handheld cameras and ones based on tripods wielded by other Enamorados to video the protests and actions he and his fellow activists took part in.
When investigators with both the Pomona Police Department and the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department began to look into the activities of the Enamorados, they came across video of both September 3 incidents as well as those of September 24, among multiple others. Indeed, the assault on the husband who emerged from the Hyundai at the carwash on Palmdale Road on September 24 was captured from at least three separate perspectives. Among those who can be seen in one of the video depictions hitting the man is Edin Enamorado, who does so with his left fist while holding and continuing to video with his cellphone in his right hand.
The documentation of the Enamorados’ activities that Edin Enamorado had provided to the world on his several websites and social media platforms simplified the investigators’ tasks of documenting the assaultive behavior that was the Enamorados’ trademark. The sheriff’s department used that documentation to get arrest warrants and put together a backup documentation to the charges prosecutors were preparing against the eight. On on the morning of December 14, 2023, between 3:20 a.m. and 4:46 a.m. López, Enamorado, Luján, Chávez, Carrasco, Acevedo’ Amésquita and Peña were taken into custody.
Despite the best effort of a legal team of seven lawyers who utilized every opening presented to them during a preliminary hearing process that dragged on into late January, Enamorado, Luján, Chávez, Carrasco, Amésquita, Peña and López were bound over for trial and repeatedly denied bail. Only Acevedo, who had initially been erroneously accused by the prosecution, his attorney Dan Chambers established, of being present at both of the incidents in Pomona on September 3, was granted bail. In general, the Enamorados put on trial were accused of one count of PC182(A)(1)-felony conspiracy to commit a crime and multiple counts of PC245(a)(4) – felony assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury; PC422(A) – issuing felony threats to engage in criminal action likely to result in death or great bodily injury; PC236 – felony false imprisonment; PC22810(G)(1) – felony unlawful use of tear gas; and PC207(A). In addition, Edin Enamorado was one count of PC22810(A) – misdemeanor possession of tear gas by a convicted felon; and one count of PC29800(A)(1) – felony possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
While Acevedo was free, the other seven remained incarcerated. On June 7, Luján, Chávez, Carrasco, Amésquita and Peña entered a single guilty plea each to a single count of violating Penal Code § 245(a)(4)-F: assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, and López entered a single guilty plea to PC245(a)(1)-F: assault with a deadly weapon other than a firearm likely to result in great bodily injury, whereupon Judge John M. Wilkerson accepted the pleas upon finding they were intelligently and knowledgeably made. In sentencing Luján, Carrasco, Amésquita, he granted the three women an immediate release, with a requirement that they return to court on December 12, at which point they are to be sentenced to 353 days in county jail and will simultaneously be given, as of that date, credit for 353 days’ time served. Chávez, Peña and López are to remain in custody and return to court on December 12, at which point they are to be sentenced to two years in state prison with 364 days’ credit for time served to be subtracted from that term.
Edin Enamorado remained defiant, insisting that his aggressive activities in defending the poor and disenfranchised and standing up for street vendors while confronting the racists who victimize them have never crossed the line into criminality. His attorney, Rosenberg, an experienced criminal defense attorney who has had some notable successes with serious cases, including gangland murders and crimes in which his clients were charged under the so-called RICO [Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations] statute, wherein he obtained full exonerations or greatly mitigated convictions and sentences for his clients significantly less than what was anticipated, in vain sought to convince Enamorado that the strength of the evidence, including the video evidence Enamorado had provided to the prosecution through his internet and social postings, had greatly weakened his legal position. Enamorado, however, is convinced that the moral rectitude of his motives outpaces whatever negative implication might attend the tactics the Enamorados used. He believes that if he can get his attorney to utilize the forum of his trial to illustrate that aggressive means to combat the unjust laws being applied against the disenfranchised immigrant community that has only limited means of making its way in a hostile capitalistic society is morally right. He is willing to stake everything on the hope that one or two or three jurors will refuse to convict him for what he maintains are principled acts. Even if he is convicted, he believes, he will have delivered a blow for La Raza against the oppressive Anglo establishment.
Edin Enamorado was impressed with Alimouri’s advocacy of Carrasco, particularly the manner in which on one occasion the lawyer went so far as to risk a contempt of court citation by standing up in court without being first acknowledged by the judge and asserting loudly and angrily that his client had done nothing wrong and that failing to grant her bail was a grave miscarriage of justice. Perceiving Rosenberg’s willingness to strike a plea bargain as defeatist, Alimouri’s acceptance of a plea bargain for Carrasco notwithstanding, Enamorado has convinced himself that his future lies more properly in the hands of Alimouri. On June 28, with Deputy District Attorney Jason Wilkinson present before Judge Wilkerson Alimouri and co-counsel Kate Smith, the motion to relieve Rosenberg as counsel for Enamorado was heard and granted, with a recognition that Alimouri had been retained to represent him going forward.
Alimouri requested a bail hearing which was set for July 12. On July 12, however, the Alimouri was not able to make that appearance because of a conflict, Instead, Erik Hammett, who had represented López, appeared for him. Hammett made a motion to withdraw the hearing, and it was postponed until July 31.

July 26 SBC Sentinel Legal Notices

SUMMONS – (CITACION JUDICIAL)
CASE NUMBER (NUMERO DEL CASO) CIV SB 2316403
NOTICE TO NICOLE HANDRINOS aka NICOLE HOMME; WILLIAM HANDRINOS; and DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF:
(LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE):
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below.
You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons is served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court.
There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court’s lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case.
¡AVISO! Lo han demandado. Si no responde dentro de 30 dias, la corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su version. Lea la informacion a continuacion
Tiene 30 DIAS DE CALENDARIO después de que le entreguen esta citación y papeles legales para presentar una repuesta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que se entreque una copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefonica no le protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar on formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulano que usted puede usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte y mas información en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov), en la biblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede mas cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentación, pida si secretario de la corta que le de un formulario de exencion de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corta le podrá quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin mas advertencia.
Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que llame a un abogado inmediatamente. Si no conace a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de referencia a abogados. Si no peude pagar a un a un abogado, es posible que cumpia con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratu de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services, (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www.sucorte.ca.gov), o poniendoso en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los costos exentos gravamen sobre cualquier recuperación da $10,000 o mas de vaior recibida mediante un aceurdo o una concesión de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corta antes de que la corta pueda desechar el caso.
The name and address of the court is: (El nombre y la direccion de la corte es):
Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, 247 West 3rd St, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0212, Branch Name: San Bernardino Justice Center
The name, address and telephone number of plaintiff’s attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney, is: (El nombre, la direccion y el numero de telefono del abogado del demandante, o del demendante que no tiene abogado, es):
NAZILA Y. LEVY, Esquire
LEVY & NOURAFCHAN
9454 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 500
BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212
Phone: (310) 274-9993
Fax: (310) 888-3255
DATE (Fecha): JULY 19, 2023
Clerk (Secretario), by Abriana Rodriguez
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on July 5, 12, 19 & 26, 2024.

FBN 20240004813
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
INTERNATIONAL AUTOS 148 E BASELINE STREET SUITE C-10 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92410: CAPSULA CORPORATION 2100 S LARK ELLEN AVE 90 WEST COVINA, CA 91792
Business Mailing Address: 148 E BASELINE STREET SUITE C-10 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92410
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION registered with the State of California under the number 5426306.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ JOHN KENNEDY MUNOZ ROSARIO, President
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 5/20/2024
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy J2523
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on June 28 and July 5, 12 & 19, 2024.

Continue reading

CVUSD Sues State To Allow Parental Notification Of Student Gender Reidentification

The Chino Valley Unified School District and the parents of eight students attending its schools and those in three other school districts in California have filed a lawsuit against Governor Gavin Newsom, California Attorney General Rob Bonta and California Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond in an effort to prevent the enforcement of a recently passed state law prohibiting schools from making a practice of notifying parents if their children are assuming a gender different from the one assigned them at birth.
The suit comes nearly a year after the Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Trustees instituted a parental notification policy that was in short order challenged by Bonta and his office and thereby blocked from being applied.
Representing the district and parents Oscar Avila, Monica Botts, Jason Craig, Kristi Hays, Cole Mann, Victor Romero, Gheorghe Rosca, Jr. and Leslie Sawyer are the Austin, Texas-based Liberty Justice Center and attorney Emily Rae.
The lawsuit challenges AB 1955, which was signed by Governor Newsom on Monday, July 15 and is scheduled to take effect January 1, 2025. AB 1955, authored by Assembly Member Chris Ward, D-San Diego, came in reaction to the passage of Chino Valley Unified’s policy followed by similar actions by the Orange, Temecula Valley and Murrieta Valley school districts.
The Chino Unified School District Board of Education took up the issue of parental notification after Republican Assemblyman Bill Essayli in March 2023 introduced Assembly Bill 1314, which would have required schools in California to notify parents in writing within three days if a student identified at school as a gender different from his or her assigned gender at birth. AB 1314 died a quiet legislative procedural death when Assemblyman Al Muratsuchi, a Democrat and the chairman of the Assembly Education Committee, declined to set a hearing date for the bill before his committee, such that the bill was not given a chance to be considered by the entire Assembly. Continue reading

Six Local Measures So Far Set For November 5 Ballot In SBC

So far, six local voter initiatives have qualified to appear on the November 5 ballot corresponding to the Presidential General Election in San Bernardino County.
One of those will be a measure to increase the tax for short-term vacation rentals such as hotels, motels, inns and so-called air mattress bed and breakfasts in the county’s unincorporated areas.
In Grand Terrace, voters will consider a 1 cent per dollar sales tax override, what city officials are calling a 1 percent transactions and use tax.
The City of Needles is asking its voters to determine whether the city should impose a 10 percent tax on all marijuana related businesses.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is turning to its residents this year to see if they will vote to approve a “transient occupancy tax,” otherwise known as a bed tax or hotel/motel tax, of 12 percent.
The City of Yucaipa is asking its residents to approve a one cent per dollar sales tax.
The Morongo Unified School District is asking the residents who live within its boundaries to authorize the district to issue and sell up to $88,300,000 in bonds, the proceeds from which are to be used for the specific school facilities projects. Continue reading