A social worker who in 2013 was fired for exposing that the San Bernardino County Department of Children and Family Services had allowed foster children to be placed into the home of a known abuser was awarded $2.5 million by a federal jury in the aftermath of his whistleblower lawsuit against the county.
Then-31-year old Eric Bahra was working for the San Bernardino County Department of Children and Family Services as a social worker in the Spring of 2013 when he was assigned to investigate claims by foster children that they were being molested by their former foster father, Leonardo Rodriguez. The children had been removed from the care of Rodriquez and his wife, Maria, in January 2013 and placed in another foster home. One of the youngest children, at that point in another foster home, confided to her new foster mother that her former foster father, later identified as Leonardo Rodriquez, had been molesting her.
After Bahra was assigned to the case, he arranged for the girl and her sister to be interviewed at his department’s assessment center in San Bernardino. Bahra and a detective assigned to the sheriff’s department’s crimes against children unit monitored that interview as it was ongoing.
Among the things the girls revealed was that after he molested them, Leonardo Rodriguez would photograph them naked and put the photos in an album which contained photographs of other nude children. They said Rodriguez told them he always did this to the youngest of his foster children.
The girls’ suggestion that Rodriguez had abused others before them did not gibe with reports Bahra and the detective had been provided with by the department of children and family services. Documents from the department showed the Rodriguezes had been serving as foster parents for over ten years and there were no complaints – referred to in children and family services parlance as referrals – pertaining to either of Leonardo or Maria.
The detective asked Bahra to learn from the department of children and family services the number of children placed in the Rodriguez home over the previous decade. Bahra went to his office in Victorville and spoke with a department manager, who directed him to another manager, who then along with Eric and another couple of supervisors produced a list of former foster children who had been placed in the Rodriguez home over the years, a total of 54 children.
Within moments after Bahra obtained the list, one of the office supervisors emailed a high-ranking supervisor in the office and asked him if it would be acceptable for Bahra to forward the information on the 54 children in the Rodriguez home to the sheriff’s detecitve. Bahra was given go-ahead to do so.
Bahra recognized that foster family situations in general generate plenty of investigation referrals – complaints – many or a majority of which express dissatisfaction or unhappiness on the part of children under foster care or the biological parents of the children who have been removed from their homes. Rarely do these picayune matters represent any serious transgression on the part of a foster parent or foster parents, and accordingly are deemed to be without substance and not sustained. It struck Bahra as odd that in the department’s data base on foster parents, there were no complaints about the Rodriguezes, who had been foster parents for 12 years at that point.
Armed with the names of the children who had been fostered in the Rodriguez household, Bahra did a “reverse search” into the matter, going through the names of the children to find their placement histories. In that fashion, he found that of the 54 children placed in the Rodriguez home, 11 had made complaints resulting in referrals for investigation. Of those 11 referrals pertaining to mistreatment of the children or physical abuse that was not deemed sexual in nature, Bahra learned, seven had been sustained, that is, found to be valid, resulting in the children being removed from the Rodriguez home. Bahra noted that once the referrals had been made and after the investigations concluded and the children removed, the referrals and their results were never tracked by other social workers. Children were removed from the Rodriguez home under the watch of one social worker, but subsequently other children were placed into the Rodriguez home by other social workers, in what was described as “a revolving door situation.”
Bahra made further inquiries, looking at what was available to him, and he saw that social workers for more than ten years had not recorded information about the Rodriguez couple accurately, sometimes misspelling “Rodriguez” as “Rodriquez,” using an incorrect social security number for either Leonardo or Maria, transposing the birth dates for Leonardo with Maria or vice versa and making other entry errors. In the Rodriguezes’ foster parenting file there was no mention whatsoever of the 11 complaints or seven that had been sustained. Bahra also learned that Leonardo and Maria had been decertified as as foster parents by one foster agency, but that county officials had gone to another, San Bernardino-based Children’s Way Foster Family Agency, to have them recertified.
Bahra at that point collated all the information, data and documents he had relating to the Rodriguezes, and provided it to one of his supervisors, Kristine Burgamy.
Burgamy responded, asking if Bahra had provided the sheriff’s detective with the list of 54 children who had been under foster care in the Rodriguez home. Bahra indicated that he had. Burgamy asked then if he had provided the detective with the information about the decertification of the Rodriguezes by one foster agency and its recertification by another, after which placements of foster children into the Rodriguez household had continued. When Bahra said that he had not yet done that, Burgamy instructed him to not provide that information to the sheriff’s department.
The following day, Bahra came into his office to find Burgamy, together with the deputy director of the Victorville children and family services office, Nicola Hackett, going through his desk and the documents therein and thereon. Hackett and Burgamy “ordered Mr. Bahra to do no further investigation on what he had found and ordered Mr. Bahra to turn over all of his investigative documents to them,” according to Bahra’s lawsuit, filed by attorney Valerie Ross.
From that point on, Bahra encountered an almost nightmarish overreaction to his efforts to carry out what he thought the focus of his function was, that being to look after the best interests of the children in the county-administered foster system. Those who had advanced in the department of children and family services, he learned, were more concerned in protecting the county governmental structure from liability after incidents of abuse of foster children occurred than in examining the shortcomings in the system and adjusting or correcting them to prevent abusive foster parents from remaining in place, as revelations of such matters would result in unwanted scrutiny and negative publicity.
Burgamy and Hackett were concerned in particular about Bahra having in his possession the so-called “M” files. The M refers to the first letter in the last name of five siblings who had been in the care of the Rodriguezes, and the abuse they had been subjected to while there. Ultimately, an attorney had learned of what the children had been subjected to, and he sued the county and the Rodriquezes on their behalf. Ultimately, when that case went to trial in 2017, the five children and their family were awarded $712,500, $302,500 of which was put up by the County of San Bernardino, $375,000 from Children’s Way Foster Family Agency and $35,000 from the Rodriguezes.
In 2013, however, well before the attorney for the five children had taken up their case, county officials were concerned about the liability they might have if details about what had occurred became public. At once, Hackett, Burgamy and other higher-ups in the children and family services department set about seeking to discredit Bahra, which included “making book” on him, a move preparatory to orchestrating his firing. They placed into his personnel file numerous demerits with regard to his performance and comportment, including cooked-up allegations of being uncooperative, rude, discourteous or insulting to his colleagues and supervisors, scheduling activity on the part of his colleagues without coordinating with them and engaging in violations of the confidentiality of the foster parents and children, most notably when he had disclosed information about a 4-year-old foster child having been sexually abused to those the department of children and family services deemed were not entitled to know of it.
Orchestrating Bahra’s firing presented a challenge, however, since just before the incident involving Burgamy and Hackett rifling through his desk, he had been given an “excellent” rating in a job performance evaluation. Moreover, his colleagues held him in high regard.
To buttress their case, department directors sought to get one of Bahra’s colleagues, Mary Anna Whitehall, to provide testimony that Bahra had provided falsified documentation with regard to an investigation he had been assigned previously relating to the death of a child in foster care. Whitehall, however, refused to support the department administration in that effort. As a consequence, she, too, became persona non grata with the department of children and family services and was put on administrative leave. To avoid being terminated, she resigned.
Initially, the county began termination proceedings against Bahra based on seven allegations, then increased that to 20 allegations, thereafter reducing it down to 12 accusations.
Ultimately, on October 7, 2013, one month shy of achieving the two-year end of his probationary status as a county children and family services employee, Bahra was terminated.
He retained Ross, who has a law office in Victorville, to represent him.
Ross filed suit on Bahra’s behalf in federal court.
The case was assigned to Federal Judge Jesus Bernal, who, in accordance with then-current case law, dismissed the complaint based upon the county’s contention that Bahra had not exhausted all of his administrative remedies before filing suit. Bernal’s ruling, however, came on the very day that an appeals court, in the case of Taswell v. the Regents of the University of California, ruled that following such an administrative appeal procedure against an entity that made a firing in bad faith should not preclude a plaintiff from pursuing the remedy of a legal action if that individual has been, arguably, unjustifiably terminated by the entity that would conduct the administrative examination of the termination.
Ultimately, Bahra’s case was reinstated and the matter came back to Bernal’s courtroom. By that point Ross had associated herself with regard to Bahra’s case with the Sausalito-based father/son legal team of Charles and A. Cabral Bonner.
Ross and the Bonners represented Bahra in a jury trial before Judge Bernal that concluded Thursday. The jury made unanimous findings in Bahra’s favor, the first of which was that Bahra disclosed to the department and the sheriff’s investigator “a systemic failure in the operation, maintenance and monitoring of the case management database system that resulted in children being placed in the home of known abusers.” Furthermore, the jury found that Bahra had “reasonable grounds to believe that the information disclosed a violation of state and federal laws including the Adoption and Safe Families Act and that his “disclosure of information [was] a contributing factor in the County of San Bernardino’s decision to terminate [him].”
The county further determined Bahra suffered harm as a result of what the county did and that the county failed to “prove by clear and convincing evidence that it would have terminated Eric Bahra anyway at the time for legitimate, independent reasons.”
The jury found Bahra was due $503,093 in past economic loss, including wages lost, and that he was due another $2 million for “past non-economic loss, including mental and emotional pain and suffering.”
Ross told the Sentinel, “I always knew we had a strong case. This was like a slow-moving freight train going down the track to a certain conclusion, which was reflected in the jury’s verdict. The county needed Eric out of that office because the “M” children were going to be suing, and they had to discredit him because they knew that outside of management there was no one else who knew what had really occurred, and if he was called upon to testify, he was going to do so truthfully. This case showed that child and family services managers are willing to engage in fraudulent activity to protect themselves and the county.”
Ross said, “Having associated with Charles and Cabral Bonner was a tremendous advantage. Cabral did the direct examination of Eric, which was one of the most compelling expositions I have ever seen in a courtroom. That, I believe is what won the case. Charles handled the closing arguments, and he was excellent, and then he obliterated the county’s case with a standout rebuttal.”
Bahra, who has since found work as a therapist at High Desert Psychological Services in Victorville, said, “I feel a great sense of relief for myself that I can finally close this chapter of my life, but I still have a great sense of sadness and worry for the children in San Bernardino County. It was made clear during trial the San Bernardino County Children and Family Services Department has made no changes in eight years in how they address this systemic problem of placing foster children in the homes of known abusers. This continues to place foster children at risk of abuse in foster homes in San Bernardino County. My hope is that this verdict will shine a spotlight on this issue and help to protect the foster children in San Bernardino County.”
Whitehall is also pursuing a case against San Bernardino County. Unlike Bahra’s matter, hers has been filed in state court. Despite her case having twice been dismissed at the trial court level, two appeals that went all the way to the California Supreme Court have put Whitehall’s matter on track to go to trial later this year.
-Mark Gutglueck

The California Legislature and Governor Gavin Newsom have provided some $51.5 million in the 2021-2022 budget for various community repair, improvement or construction projects around San Bernardino County, including $33.5 million designated for use within the City of San Bernardino.
$12 million is being provided to construct a fire station in Yucca Valley. San Bernardino County Fire Chief Dan Munsey said he hopes the new facility can be located to not only serve Yucca Valley, its residents and businesses, but enhance fire protection and emergency response into Landers as well.
The 2021-22 California Budget also frees up $37 million for use by the 20,000-student strong San Bernardino Community College District for major improvements to its two campuses.
By providing matching funds, the district will receive $31 million from the state to be used to construct a modern workforce training center at San Bernardino Valley College. The workforce training center is to serve as a learning facility for those students intent less on pursuing heavy academics and more interested in a blue collar trade, such as automotive repair, general engine repair, water systems maintenance and management, heavy truck technology, manufacturing, woodworking, machining, electrical heating and air conditioning and other practical and employable skills.
The cost of the workforce training center is estimated at “Roughly $74 million, ballpark,” said Angel Rodriguez, the San Bernardino Community College District’s senior director of marketing, public affairs & government relations.
In addition, the district is to receive $6 million to partially defray the cost of constructing a new arts education and performance venue at Crafton Hills College in Yucaipa, which is to replace the 43-year-old Finkelstein Performing Arts Center.
The new facility will feature a 270-seat main theater, a black box theater, a costume shop, theater scene shop, music recital room, recording studio and classrooms.
The State of California has also conferred $2.5 million upon the California Theatre, intended to rescue the downtown San Bernardino performing venue and home of the San Bernardino Symphony from a feared demise. The 1,700-seat historic facility, located in downtown San Bernardino, is owned by the City of San Bernardino. The money is to be used for refurbishing the performance house’s Wurlitzer organ, a historic music box that is in a state of dishabille, as well as replacing seating and carpeting, and making other upgrades.

In what is likely to be his last public appeal on the matter, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti on Tuesday, July 12 called upon San Bernardino County’s transportation officials to embrace extending the light rail passenger Gold Line to Montclair.
The Metrolink train that runs between San Bernardino and Union Station and vice versa is the only rail commuter option between Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties that currently exists. The track for diesel-powered Metrolink, however is shared with cargo trains, and it does not have frequent departures or arrivals, with the shortest time between departures running 45 to 50 minutes at certain times of the day and as much as an hour-and-a-half at other times.
Consequently, Metrolink is not heavily used and it does little or nothing to alleviate heavy traffic on the freeways into and out of Los Angeles on a daily basis.
The Gold Line, which runs on a separate track dedicated to passenger transport alone from Downtown Los Angeles to Azusa, uses lighter cars and more fuel-efficient engines, with staggered departures and arrivals of as little as every eight minutes. The Gold Line is thus heavily used, with its cars nearing capacity on virtually every run.
The Los Angeles County-based Gold Line Construction Authority right now is in the first stages toward a nine-mile, $806 million extension of the light rail line from Azusa to northern Pomona, such that at present work on the leg between Azusa and Glendora is under way.
The track will reach Pomona by late 2025. Thereafter, the line was previously slated to be extended another 3.3 miles from Pomona through Claremont to Montclair at that city’s existing Montclair Transit Center. From there, the  intention had been to extend it from Montclair to Ontario Airport. According to the Gold Line Construction Authority, the extension of the line from north Pomona to Claremont will entail a cost of $450 million. Previously, the Gold Line Construction Authority in conjunction with the San Bernardino County Transportation Agency, when it was previously known as San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), intended to continue the line from Claremont to Montclair, and then from Montclair to Ontario Airport. SANBAG had accordingly dedicated $39 million in available transportation money toward the Gold Line project, and did a joint application with the Los Angeles Metro Transit Agency for a State of California Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program grant. That application was successful and it brought in $250 million on the Los Angeles County side, which made a significant but not complete inroad on the $850 funding deficit that jurisdiction had, and provided another $41 million of the then-projected $80 million cost for the San Bernardino County portion of the projected expense on the eastern side of the Los Angeles County/San Bernardino County border in terms of getting the line to Montclair.
Subsequently, however, when the project went out to bid, it turned out the cost of building the line from Claremont to Montclair would not contain itself to an earlier $73 million projection or the later $80 million estimate, but had escalated to $96 million.
In reaction to that projected cost overrun, San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Executive Director Ray Wolfe convinced a majority of the San Bernardino County Transportation Agency board in the fall of 2019 to pull the plug on San Bernardino County’s portion of the Gold Line funding. On October 10, 2019 the San Bernardino County Transportation Agency’s transit subcommittee, composed of representatives from the cities of Big Bear Lake, Chino Hills, Colton, Fontana, Highland, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, Yucaipa and the Third Supervisorial District, endorsed Wolfe’s proposal to dispense with constructing the new Gold Line track into San Bernardino County altogether and to instead have Gold Line passengers heading eastward from Los Angeles or the San Gabriel Valley load onto another train at the Claremont Station which will run on the existing MetroLink track. Only the representatives from Ontario, Montclair and Chino Hills dissented in that 8-to-3 vote.
San Bernardino County transportation officials declared their intention to return the $41 million State of California Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program grant that had been freed up to allow the county to overcome the gap between the $39 million in available revenue from the half-cent sales tax collected throughout San Bernardino County for transportation improvements for completing the Gold Line extension from Claremont to Montclair and the earlier projected cost of the 1.2-mile extension.
Garcetti, who is convinced that the Gold Line represents a far more viable and comprehensive intercounty transportation system that provides the most realistic means of reducing vehicular traffic on the 210, !-10 and 60 Freeways, said regional transportation planners, including those in San Bernardino County should not give up on the Gold Line option.
Garcetti was recently appointed by President Joseph Biden to serve as ambassador to India, and will be stepping down as mayor upon his confirmation by the Senate to the diplomatic posting.
In the meantime, he said, he is going to meet with Governor Gavin Newsom in an effort to free up state money to cover the cost of completing the Gold Line, ultimately, at the least, to Ontario Airport.
That will augment a letter to the California Budget Committee from 14 state lawmakers from the San Gabriel Valley and western San Bernardino County, co-signed by multiple municipal officials, seeking an additional $540 million from the state’s surplus to hasten the completion of the 12.3 mile extension of the line now under construction from Azusa to Pomona, and push on with extending the line to Montclair.
Garcetti said now is the time to press the state, which is functioning with a $75 billion surplus, to come across with the money to complete the entire Gold Line undertaking.
-Mark Gutglueck

Fire Station 315, which had lain dormant since it was built a dozen years ago and was relegated to being a relic during the decade while the Victorville Municipal Fire Department had been shuttered in favor of having the San Bernardino County Fire Department provide the High Desert’s largest city with fire protection and emergency response service, has at last been opened, is now occupied by firefighters and is in use.
A combination of factors, including the city’s move to reinitiate in-house fire protection service and city voters’ 19,289 votes or 50.22 percent-to-19,109 or 49.78 percent passage of public safety initiative Measure P in November 2020, resulted in city officials resolving to reopen the fire station.
Symbolically and in a gesture honoring the city’s first fire chief, one day before this year’s Independence Day, on July 3, a two-man crew began quietly operating out of the facility.
At the time of its incorporation in 1962, the City of Victorville was indirectly dependent upon the county fire department, which provided supervision of the team of volunteer on-call firefighters that composed the new city’s fire department, which had existed pre-incorporation in one form or another since 1926. In 1976, the city recruited Rudy Cabriales, a one-time border patrol agent with the Immigration and Naturalization Service who had transitioned to a career as a firefighter in his hometown of Calexico before rising to become the fire chief of Coachella in Riverside County, to relocate to Victorville and become fire chief of an operation morphing from being a county-supervised team of volunteers to a professional department. Cabriales built that organization into what some considered to be the premier fire department in the High Desert, and retired after 21 years as fire chief in 1997. After an unsuccessful try in 1998, Cabriales sought, and won, a berth on the Victorville City Council in 2000.
In 2004, the Hesperia City Council in a highly controversial move closed out its municipal fire department and contracted with the county fire department for fire safety service.
In 2007, the City of Victorville was engaged in a community-wide debate on whether it had adequate financial resources to augment its fire department with the addition of a licensed paramedic on each of the primary fire engines run out of the city’s three fully-staffed fire stations. City officials ultimately erred on the side of fiscal caution and took a leaf out of Hesperia’s book, dissolving the city fire department in favor of contracting with the county fire department, which already had paramedics aboard its engines.
In May 2008, the city council, in a 3-to-2 vote, with Cabriales and then-City Councilwoman JoAnn Almond dissenting, voted to disband the Victorville municipal fire department as of July 1, 2008, and to contract with San Bernardino County and its fire service division for fire protection and emergency medical services.
For Cabriales, that decision was triply painful, eradicating his legacy, surrendering the city’s control of its own public safety fate and consigning into oblivion Fire Station 315, which was at that point in the primary stage of construction and on track for completion the following year. Cabriales considered the creation of Fire Station 315 as one of his primary accomplishments as a member of the city council. He grew bitter that it was not actuated into a functioning firehouse.
In February 2017, with Cabriales no longer one of its members, the city council as it was then composed voted 4-1 to terminate the city’s contract with the San Bernardino County Fire Protection District when that contract was scheduled to end on July 5, 2018, and reestablish the Victorville Municipal Fire Department.
Measure P, which was originally conceived as a way of generating funds to hire more sheriff’s deputies through the city’s contract with the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, was placed on the November 2020 ballot not as a specialized tax intended for a specific purpose but rather as a general tax of one additional cent per dollar sales tax for the city. It therefore did not need two-thirds approval. As it turned out, it narrowly passed, yet passed nonetheless. It took effect on April 1, 2021 increasing Victorville’s sales tax rate from 7.75 percent to 8.75 percent.
The city council, advised by its citizens’ oversight committee, in May voted that in addition to using the available Measure P money to up the number of deputies patrolling Victorville’s the streets, it would intensify the life protection efforts of the fire department, which included hiring six new paramedic certified firefighters, three shifts of two each, to serve on a firetruck run out of Fire Station 315, located at 12820 Eucalyptus Street. The station lies within the so-called Golden Triangle formed by the intersection of Bear Valley Road, Highway 395 and the I-15 Freeway, southeast of Duncan Corners and immediately north of the Sunset Ridge District, previously one of the city’s neighborhoods with the longest response times to emergency calls.
-Mark Gutglueck

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER CIVSB2116266
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: Petitioner: Marleina Reylene Fraire filed with this court for a decree changing names as follows:
Leia Rey Panelli to Lola Rey Panelli
THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
Notice of Hearing:
Date: 08/11/21
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Department: S17
The address of the court is Superior Court of California,County of San Bernardino, 247 W. Third St., San Bernardino, CA 92415-0210
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be published in the The San Bernardino County Sentinel in San Bernardino County California, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing of the petition.
Dated: June 11, 2021
Lynn M. Poncin
Judge of the Superior Court.
Published in The San Bernardino County Sentinel on 06/25/21, 07/02/21, 07/09/21, 07/16/21

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT FILE NO-20210006656
The following person(s) is(are) doing business as: Lovely Dental, 130 S. Mountain Ave, Unit G, Upland, CA 91786, Dental Practice of Dr. A.F. Concepcion, 130 S Mountain Ave Unit 6, Upland, CA 91786
Business is Conducted By: A Corporation
Signed: BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/Anthony F Concepcion
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/23/21
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.
Began Transacting Business: 05/04/21
County Clerk, s/ I5199
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code).
06/25/21, 07/02/21, 07/09/21, 07/16/21

FBN 20210005115 The following entity is doing business as THEMINIBEAUTICIAN; MELSSHHECRETA; #LOOKFEELSMELLBEAUTIFUL; MDULAYSTOUCH; #DECKEDOUT; #LETSENHANCELETSNOTCHANGE, 13788 ROSWELL AVE., SUITE 136 CHINO HILLS, CA 91709: MELISSA M DULAY 2359 VALLEY VIEW DR. CHINO HILLS , CA 91709 Mailing Address: 2359 VALLEY VIEW DR. CHINO HILLS, CA 91709 This Business is Conducted By: AN INDIVIDUAL BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing. S/ MELISSA M DULAY This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 5/13/2021 I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Began Transacting Business: APRIL 15, 2021 County Clerk, Deputy I1327 NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code). Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on 5/21, 5/28, 6/4 & 6/11, 2021 & Corrected on: 06/25/21, 07/02/21, 07/09/21, 07/16/21

ABANDONMENT OF AN FBN 20210004542 The following entity was doing business as GAMESTOP 5196 14190 BEAR VALLEY ROAD, SUITE C VICTORVILLE, CA 92392: GAMESTOP, INC 625 WESTPORT PARKWAY GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 State of Incorporation: MN Reg. No.: C1969245 Mailing Address: 625 WESTPORT PARKWAY GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 This Business is Conducted By: A CORPORATION Date of Current Filing: 11/16/20 Former FBN#: FBN20200010537 BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing. S/ GEORGE E. SHERMAN This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 04/29/2021 I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Began Transacting Business: 06/11/2005 County Clerk, Deputy I6733 NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code). Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel April 16, 23, and 30 & May 7, 2021, & Corrected on: 06/25/21, 07/02/21, 07/09/21, 07/16/21

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT FILE NO20210005212 The following person(s) is(are) doing business as: Alied Physical Therapy, 7365 Carnelian Street Suite #124, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, Alied Five Star Corp, 7365 Carnelian Street Suite #124, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Business is Conducted By: A Corporation Signed: BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing. s/Suraiya Ahmed This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 05/17/21 I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Began Transacting Business: 02/23/2006 County Clerk, NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code). 05/21/21, 05/28/21, 06/04/21, 06/11/21 & Corrected on: 06/25/21, 07/02/21, 07/09/21, 07/16/21

FBN 20210004541 The following entity was doing business as GAMESTOP 3897 16232 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUITE B FONTANA, CA92335: GAMESTOP, INC 625 WESTPORT PARKWAY GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 State of Incorporation: MN Reg. No.: 1969245 Mailing Address: 625 WESTPORT PARKWAY, ATTN: Business License Dept., GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 Date of Current Filing: 11/16/2020 Previous FBN#: FBN20200010522 This Business is Conducted By: A CORPORATION BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing. S/ GEORGE E. SHERMAN This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 04/29/2021 I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Began Transacting Business: 05/10/2007 County Clerk, Deputy C9754 NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code). Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on 5/21, 5/28, 6/4 & 6/11, 2021 & Corrected on: 06/25/21, 07/02/21, 07/09/21, 07/16/21

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: MICHAEL EDWARD VASQUEZ
CASE NO. PROSB2100144
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of MICHAEL EDWARD VASQUEZ has been filed by ROSEANN BECERRA in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that ROSEANN BECERRA be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held AUGUST 5, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. No. S36 at Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, San Bernardino District.
Kimberly Tilley, Deputy
JUNE 15, 2021
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Filed: APRIL 1, 2021
Attorney for the Roseann Becerra:
R. SAM PRICE SBN 208603
PRICE LAW FIRM, APC
300 E STATE STREET SUITE 620
REDLANDS, CA 92373
(909) 475 8800
sam@pricelawfirm.com
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on July 2, July 9 & July 16, 2021.
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: VIRGINIA L. HADLEY
CASE NO. PROSB2100158
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of VIRGINIA L. HADLEY has been filed by VALERIE CARESS in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that VALERIE CARESS be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held AUGUST 18, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. No. S37 at Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, San Bernardino District.
Judge Tara Reilly
JUNE 15, 2021
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Filed: June 15, 2021
Attorney for Valerie Caress:
R. SAM PRICE SBN 208603
PRICE LAW FIRM, APC
300 E STATE STREET SUITE 620
REDLANDS, CA 92373
(909) 475 8800
sam@pricelawfirm.com
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on July 2, July 9 & July 16, 2021.
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: JAD OUSSAMA SIDANI
CASE NO. PROSB2100135
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of JAD OUSSAMA SIDANI
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by
Marissa Navarrette in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Marissa Navarrette be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held AUGUST 2, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. No. S-36 at Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, San Bernardino District.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Filed: JUNE 25, 2021
Attorney for the Petitioner:
TYLER H. BROWN, ESQ. SBN 259620
BROWN & BROWN
1152 N. MOUNTAIN AVE, SUITE 210
UPLAND, CA 91786
Telephone No: (909) 982-5086
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on 07/02, 07/09 & 07/16, 2021
FBN 20210006704
The following person is doing business as BELOVED LULU 3040 N. STODDARD AVE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92405: AILEEN ROBLES 3040 N. STODDARD AVE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92405
This Business is Conducted By: AN INDIVIDUAL
BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
S/ AILEEN ROBLES
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 6/24/2021
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Began Transacting Business: N/A
County Clerk, Deputy I5199
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code). Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on 07/02/21, 07/09/21, 07/16/21, 07/23/21

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME
STATEMENT FILE NO-20210006021
The following person(s) is(are) doing business as: Sharkey Financial, 7828 Haven Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, College Planning Professionals, LLC, 7828 Haven Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Business is Conducted By: A Limited Liability Company
Signed: BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/Stephanie Harkey
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/07/2021
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.
Began Transacting Business: N/A
County Clerk, s/ I1327
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code).
07/02/21, 07/09/21, 07/16/21, 07/23/21

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME
STATEMENT FILE NO-20210006127
The following person(s) is(are) doing business as: Cano’s Pool Service, 5394 Yale St, Montclair, CA 91763, Alejandro Lucas, 5394 Yale St, Montclair, CA 91763
Business is Conducted By: An Individual
Signed: BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ Alejandro Lucas
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/10/2021
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.
Began Transacting Business: 05/31/2021
County Clerk, s/ I5199
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code).
07/02/21, 07/09/21, 07/16/21, 07/23/21

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME
STATEMENT FILE NO-20210006127
The following person(s) is(are) doing business as: Cano’s Pool Service, 5394 Yale St, Montclair, CA 91763, Alejandro Lucas, 5394 Yale St, Montclair, CA 91763
Business is Conducted By: An Individual
Signed: BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ Alejandro Lucas
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/10/2021
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.
Began Transacting Business: 05/31/2021
County Clerk, s/ I5199
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code).
07/02/21, 07/09/21, 07/16/21, 07/23/21

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME
STATEMENT FILE NO-20210006763
The following person(s) is(are) doing business as: POP Roxy Girls, 18018 Deerberry Way, San Bernardino, CA 92407, Mailing Address: 18018 Deerberry Way, San Bernardino, CA 92407, Keisha M. Harris, 18018 Deerberry Way, San Bernardino, CA 92407
Business is Conducted By: An Individual
Signed: BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ Keisha M. Harris
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/29/2021
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.
Began Transacting Business: 03/01/2021
County Clerk, s/ I5199
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code).
07/02/21, 07/09/21, 07/16/21, 07/23/21
Notice of Sale of Real Property at Private Sale
Case No.: PROPS2000150
In re the Matter of: THE ESTATE OF ISABEL FRANCO STOKES, Decedent.
Pursuant to Probate Code §§ 10300, 10304,
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, subject to confirmation by this court, on September 8, 2021, at 9:00 a.m., or thereafter within the time allowed by law, Jaime Salazar, as administrator of the estate of the above-named decedent, will sell at public auction to the highest and best net bidder on the terms and conditions stated below all right, title, and interest of the decedent at the time of death and all right, title, and interest that the estate has acquired in addition to that of the decedent at the time of death, in the real property located in San Bernardino County, California.
This property is commonly referred to as 1476 Turquoise Avenue, Mentone, CA 92359, assessor’s parcel number 0298-073-10-0-000, and is more fully described as follows: The following described real property located in the County of San Bernardino, State of California: Lot 16 of Tract Number 2868 Soffel addition# 2, as per Map recorded in Book 39, page{s) 66 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino County, State of California.
The property will be sold subject to current taxes, covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, rights, rights of way, and easements of record, with any encumbrances of record to be satisfied from the purchase price.
The property is to be sold on an “as is” basis, except for title.
The personal representative has given an exclusive listing to REACH Real Estate.
Bids or offers are invited for this property and must be in writing, and can be mailed or delivered at any time after first publication of this notice and before any sale is made, to the attorney for the administrator: R. Sam Price Price Law Firm APC 300 East State Street, Suite 620 Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 328-7000
The property will be sold on the following terms: Cash, or part cash and part credit, the terms of such credit to be acceptable to the undersigned and to the court, 10 percent (10%) of the amount of the bid to accompany the offer by certified check, and the balance to be paid within thirty (30) days of confirmation of sale by the court.
Taxes, rents, operating and maintenance expenses, and premiums on insurance acceptable to the purchaser shall be prorated as of the date of recording of conveyance. Examination of title, recording of conveyance, transfer taxes, and any title insurance policy shall be at the expense of the purchaser or purchasers.
The right is reserved to reject any and all bids.
The amount of overbid should at least be $237,800.
A 10% deposit by the successful overbidder in the form of certified check is a requirement.
The time and place for anyone wishing or seeking to contest the auctioning of this property or the process by which it is to take place is to make such a protest is August 10, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. in Department S36 before the Honorable Judge Hon. Michelle H. Gilleece.
Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino
247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, San Bernardino District – Probate Division.
For further information and bid forms, contact: R. Sam Price Price Law Firm APC 300 East State Street, Suite 620 Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 328-7000 sam@pricelawfirm.com
Filed: June 2, 2021
Selyna Razo, Deputy Clerk San Bernardino County Superior Court
S/Jaime Salazar, Administrator of the Estate of Isabel Franco Stokes
S/ R. Sam Price, Esq. Attorney for Jaime Salazar
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel July 9, 16, 23 & 30, 2021
FBN 20210006319
The following entity is doing business as RESILIENT MARTIAL ARTS AND FITNESS 9524 19th STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737: EXCELLENT ENGLISH EXPERIENCE, INC. 8654 BAY LAUREL STREET CHINO, CAL 91708
This Business is Conducted By: A CORPORATION
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION C4296506
BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
S/ GUANGDI LIU This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 6/15/2021
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.
Began Transacting Business: JULY 10, 2019
County Clerk, Deputy I1327
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code). Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on 7/9, 7/16, 7/23 & 7/30, 2021.
CASE NUMBER: (Numero del Caso): CIVDS 2014752
SUMMONS ON FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
(CITACION JUDICIAL)
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (AVISO AL DEMANDADO): JACK RODRIGUEZ, JR. and DOES 1-25, INCLUSIVE
YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: (LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE): ALVARO GONZALEZ GARCIA, AUXILIADORA DORIAN CARMEN OBANDO and CRYSTAL GONZALEZ
NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below.
You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more infor-mation at the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court.
There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court’s lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case.
AVISO! Lo han demandado. Si no responde dentro de 30 dias, la corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su version. Lea la informacion a continuacion.
Tiene 30 DIAS DE CALENDARIO despues de que le entreguen esta citacion y papeles legales para presentar una respuesta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que se entregue una copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefonica no lo protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar en formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulario que usted pueda usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte y mas informacion en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov) en la biblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede mas cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentacion, pida al secretario de la corte que le de un formulario de exencion de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corte le podra quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin mas advertencia.
Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que llame a un abogado inmediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de remision a abogados. Si no puede pagar a un abogado, es posible que cumpla con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratuitos de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services, (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www.sucorte.ca.gov) o poniendose en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los costos exentos por imponer un gravamen sobre cualquier recuperacion de $10,000 o mas de valor recibida mediante un acuerdo o una concesion de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corte antes de que la corte pueda desechar el caso.
The name and address of the court is: (El nombre y direccion de la corte es): Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, San Bernardino District.
The name, address and telephone number of plaintiff’s attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney is: (El nombre, la direccion y el numero de telefono del abogado del demandante, o del demandante que no tiene abogado, es): JOHN S. BUZAS, SBN: 117797, GABRIEL & ASSOCIATES 801 PACIFIC AVENUE LONG BEACH, CA 90813 (562) 436-9292
Date: (Fecha) July 1, 2020
Clerk of Court (Secretario)
La Shonda Richardson, Deputy (Adjunto)
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel July 16, 23, 30 & August 6, 2021
STATEMENT OF DAMAGES
Case No.: CIVDS2014752
ALVARO GONZALEZ GARCIA, AUXILIADORA DORIAN CARMEN OBANDO, and CRYSTAL GONZALEZ
Plaintiffs
vs.
JACK RODRIGUEZ, JR., and DOES 1 to 25, inclusive,
Defendants
To Defendant, JACK RODRIGUEZ, JR., and DOES 1 to 25, inclusive,
Plaintiffs, ALVARO GONZALEZ GARCIA, AUXILIADORA DORIAN CARMEN
OBANDO, and CRYSTAL GONZALEZ, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure,
Section 425.11, hereby state the nature and amount of damages being sought as follows:
1. ALVARO GONZALEZ GARCIA:
A. GENERAL DAMAGES:
(1) Pain, suffering, and inconvenience $30,000.00
(2) Emotional distress $5,000.00
B. SPECIAL DAMAGES:
(1) Medical expenses (to date) $3,047.31
(2) Future medical expenses (present value) $2,500.00
AUXILIADORA DORIAN CARMEN OBANDO:
A. GENERAL DAMAGES:
(1) Pain, suffering, and inconvenience $30,000.00
(2) Emotional distress $5,000.00
B. SPECIAL DAMAGES:
(1) Medical expenses (to date) $3,042.68
(2) Future medical expenses (present value) $2,500.00
CRYSTAL GONZALEZ:
A. GENERAL DAMAGES:
(1) Pain, suffering, and inconvenience $15,000.00
(2) Emotional distress $5,000.00
B. SPECIAL DAMAGES:
(1) Medical expenses (to date) $1,496.29
(2). Future medical expenses (present value) $500.00
Dated: September 8, 2020
GABRIEL& ASSOCIATES
By SAMUEL E. GABRIEL
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
ALVARO GONZALEZ GARCIA, AUXILIADORA
DORIAN CARMEN OBANDO, CRYSTAL
GONZALEZ
JOHN S. BUZAS, SBN: 117797, GABRIEL & ASSOCIATES 801 PACIFIC AVENUE LONG BEACH, CA 90813
Telephone:(562) 436-9292
Facsimile: (562) 436-3131
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel July 16, 23, 30 & August 6, 2021
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: GIGI HERNANDEZ
CASE NO. PROSB2100197
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of GIGI HERNANDEZ has been filed by MARIA HERNANDEZ in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that MARIA HERNANDEZ be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held AUGUST 24, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. No. S37 at Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, San Bernardino District.
AMY GAMEZ-REYES, Deputy
JUNE 24, 2021
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Filed: June 24, 2021
Attorney for Maria Hernandez:
R. SAM PRICE SBN 208603
PRICE LAW FIRM, APC
300 E STATE STREET SUITE 620
REDLANDS, CA 92373
(909) 475 8800
sam@pricelawfirm.com
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on July 16, July 23 & July 30, 2021.

Notice of Hearing Regarding Report of Sale and Petition for Order Confirming Sale of real Property
Case No.: PROPS1800131
In re the Matter of: THE ESTATE OF ALLINE BAZILIUS, Decedent.
[Probate Code §§ 10300, 10304]
Date: August 16, 2021 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: S35 Judge: Hon. STANFORD E. REICHERT
. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, subject to confirmation by this court, on August 16,2021, at 9:00 a.m., or thereafter within the time allowed by law, Michael Paul Bazilius, as administrator of the estate of the above-named decedent, will sell at public auction to the highest and best net bidder on the terms and conditions stated below all right, title, and interest of the decedent at the time of death and all right, title, and interest that the estate has acquired in addition to that of the decedent at the time of death, in the real property located in San Bernardino County, California.
This property is commonly referred to as 4679 Chino Avenue, Chino, CA 91710, assessor’s parcel number 1019-451-08-0000, and is more fully described as follows: The following described real property located in the County of San Bernardino, State of California: That portion of the East 1/2 of Lot 35, Section 10, Township 2 South, Range 8 West, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, according to subdivision of RANCHO SAN ANA DEL CHINO, aa per plat recorded In Book 6 of Maps, page 15, records of said County, described as follows: COMMENCING at a point in the center of Chino Avenue 114 feet West from the Northeast corner of said lot at the intersection of the center lines of said Chino Avenue and West Vernon Avenue, also known as Yorba Avenue; thence South 233 feet; thence West 90 feet; thence North 233 feet; thence East 90 feet to the point of beginning,
The property will be sold subject to current taxes, covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, rights, rights of way, and easements of record, with any encumbrances of record to be satisfied from the purchase price.
The property is to be sold on an “as is” basis, except for title.
The personal representative has given an exclusive listing to Prestige Realty Group Inc.
Bids or offers are invited for this property and must be in writing, and can be mailed or delivered at any time after first publication of this notice and before any sale is made, to the attorney for the administrator: R. Sam Price Price Law Firm APC 300 East State Street, Suite 620 Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 328-7000
The property will be sold on the following terms: Cash, or part cash and part credit, the terms of such credit to be acceptable to the undersigned and to the court, 10 percent (10%) of the amount of the bid to accompany the offer by certified check, and the balance to be paid within thirty (30) days of confirmation of sale by the court.
Taxes, rents, operating and maintenance expenses, and premiums on insurance acceptable to the purchaser shall be prorated as of the date of recording of conveyance. Examination of title, recording of conveyance, transfer taxes, and any title insurance policy shall be at the expense of the purchaser or purchasers
The amount of overbid should at least be $576,950.
A 10% deposit by the successful overbidder in the form of certified check is a requirement.
For further information and bid forms, contact: R. Sam Price Price Law Firm APC 300 East State Street, Suite 620 Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 328-7000
Date: 7/16/21
Michael Paul Bazilius, Administrator of the Estate of Alline Bazilius Price Law Firm, APC
Date 7/16/21
S/ R. Sam Price
By R. Sam Price, Esq. Attorney for Michael Paul Bazilius
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 7/16, 7/23 & 7/30, 2021.
NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
Araceli Sanchez
Case NO. PROPS2100620
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of Araceli Sanchez
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Briannna Rivera in the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that Briannna Rivera be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held in Dept. No. S36 at 9:00 a.m. on October 20, 2021 at Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, 247 West 3rd St, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0212, Branch Name: Probate Division.
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Petitioner:
Kitty A. Baker, Esq.
43920 Margarita Road, Suite F
Temecula, CA 92592
Telephone No: 858-278-2800
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel:
07/16/21, 07/23/21, 07/30/21
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE NUMBER  CIVSB2118341
TO  ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: Petitioner: Shannon Anjanette Griffin filed with this court for a decree changing names as follows:
Shannon Anjanette Griffin to Shannon Anjanette Nichols
THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
Notice of Hearing:
Date: 09/08/21
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Department: S16
The address of the court is Superior Court of California,County of San Bernardino, 247 W. Third St., San Bernardino, CA 92415-0210
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be published in the The San Bernardino County Sentinel in San Bernardino County California, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing of the petition.
Dated: July 08, 2021
Lynn M. Poncin
Judge of the Superior Court.
Published in The San Bernardino County Sentinel on 07/16/21, 07/23/21,  07/30/21, 08/06/21
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME
STATEMENT FILE NO-20210006452
The following person(s) is(are) doing business as: Lux Rejuvenation Aesthetics, 1835 W Redlands Blvd, Redlands, CA 92373, Medical Legal Management, 1835 W Redlands Blvd, Redlands, CA 92373
Business is Conducted By: A Corporation
Signed: BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/Maria Sanchez
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/18/2021
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office.
Began Transacting Business: 06/01/2021
County Clerk, s/ I1327
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code).
07/16/21, 07/23/21, 07/30/21, 08/06/21

FBN 202100073333
The following entity is doing business as BUENOS DIAZ INSURANCE AND REGISTRATION 17914 FOOTHILL BLVD. #A FONTANA, CA 92335: BUENOS DIAZ INSURANCE AND REGISTRATION 17914 FOOTHILL BLVD. #A FONTANA, CA 92335
This Business is Conducted By: A CORPORATION
BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
S/Julie Diaz
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 7/16/2021
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Began Transacting Business: JUNE 7, 2021
County Clerk, Deputy I1327
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code). Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on 7/16, 7/23, 7/30 & 8/06, 2021
FBN 20210006154
The following person is doing business as: J & B LANDSCAPE SERVICES 4935 DENVER ST MONTCLAIR, CA 91763 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); JOSE LUIS BARRIOS 4935 DENVER ST MONTCLAIR, CA 91763
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JOSE LUIS BARRIOS, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/10/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 06/25/2021, 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021 CNBB252021021SN

FBN 20210006113
The following person is doing business as: MR. ROOTER PLUMBING OF VICTORVILLE 15431 ANACAPA RD SUITE 1 VICTORVILLE, CA 92392 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); PINA ENTERPIRSE, INC. 25608 NILES ST SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92404
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JOSE PINA, PRESIDENT
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/09/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 06/25/2021, 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021 CNBB25202102IR

FBN 20210006109
The following person is doing business as: PUROSOLE 1334 CEDAR ST SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92404 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); FRANK J SCLAFANI JR 1334 CEDAR ST SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92404
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ FRANK J. SCLAFANI JR, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/09/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 06/25/2021, 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021 CNBB25202103MT

FBN 20210006063
The following person is doing business as: ROSAS MAINTENANCE 315 W H ST ONTARIO, CA 91762 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); FLORENTINO ROSAS 315 W H ST ONTARIO, CA 91762
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: JUL 02, 2015
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ FLORENTINO ROSAS, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/08/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 06/25/2021, 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021 CNBB25202104MT

FBN 20210006107
The following person is doing business as: SPARKLINE CLEAN DETAILING 827 S. TAMARISK AVE. RILTO, CA 92376 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); AARON M STEWARD 827 S. TAMARISK AVE. RILATO, CA 92376
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ AARON M. STEWARD, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/09/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 06/25/2021, 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021 CNBB25202105IR

FBN 20210005542
The following person is doing business as: ICED AESTHETICS STUDIO. 1705 E. WASHINGTON ST. SUITE 102A COLTON, CA 92324 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS SAN BERNARDINO ); [ MAILING ADDRESS 518 S. ALTHEA AVE RIALTO, CA 92376]; MANIDA T SON 518 S. ALTHEA AVE. RIALTO, CA 92376
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ MANIDA T SON, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 05/24/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 06/25/2021, 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021 CNBB25202106IR
FBN 20210006609
The following person is doing business as: TAYS PEST CONTROL LLC 6087 PORTSMOUTH STREET CHINO, CA 91710 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); TAYS PORTSMOUTH STREET CHINO, CA 91710
The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ OCTAVIUS DANIELS, MANAGING MEMBER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/22/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202101

FBN 20210006547
The following person is doing business as: COR COOKING 7206 GABRIEL DRIVE FONTANA, CA 92336 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); MEGAN R POTTS 7206 GABRIEL DRIVE FONTANA, CA 92336; SCOTT A IRWIN 7206 GABRIEL DRIVE FONTANA, CA 92336
The business is conducted by: A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: JAN 24, 2019
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ MEGAN R. POTTS, GENERAL PARTNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/22/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202102MT

FBN 20210006462
The following person is doing business as: SIRANDA’S HOME RENOVATION 563 FILLMORE PL APT E POMONA, CA 91768 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); FRANCISCO J SIRANDA 563 FILMORE PL APT E POMONA, CA 91768; MELISSA A SIRANDA 563 FILMORE PL APT E POMONA, CA 91768
The business is conducted by: A MARRIED COUPLE
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ MELISSA A SIRANDA, WIFE
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/18/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202103CH

FBN 20210006323
The following person is doing business as: ACCURATE ORNAMENTALS 1891 DORJIL PLACE. APT F SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92411 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); JOSE C GUTIERREZ JR 1891 DORJIL PLACE. APT F SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92411
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: JAN 28, 2021
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JOSE C. GUTIERREZ JR, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/15/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202104IR

FBN 20210006324
The following person is doing business as: VENTURE VINDICATION; FASHION SEVEN 0 TOW 13146 WARM SANDS CT VICTORVILLE, CA 92394 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); MIRZA HASSAN 13146 WARM SANDS CT VICTORVILLE, CA 92394
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ MIRZA HASSAN, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/15/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202105IR

FBN 20210006321
The following person is doing business as: AMPELIO PADILLA’S BARBERSHOP 4639 RIVERSIDE DR CHINO, CA 91710 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS );[ MAILING ADDRESS 944 E. LEXINGTON AVE POMONA, CA 91766]; AMPELIO ENTERPRISES, INC 4639 RIVERSIDE DR CHINO, CA 91710
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ YOLANDO P. SALAS, CEO
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/15/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202106

FBN 20210006562
The following person is doing business as: EMPORIO SUSHI & MARISCOS 9765 SIERRA AVE. STE J-K FONTANA, CA 92335 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS );[ MAILING ADDRESS P.O BOX 3471 ANAHEIM, CA 92803] EMPORIO SUSHI & MARISCOS 3 INC 9765 SIERRA AVE STE J-K FONTANA, CA 92335
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ HERNAN A. URIARTE, CEO
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/21/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202107IR

FBN 20210006550
The following person is doing business as: SQUID’S TATTOOS 12756 CAMPHOR CT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); SYDNEY J BRIONES 12756 CAMPHOR CT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ SYDNEY J. BRIONES, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/21/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202108IR

FBN 20210006546
The following person is doing business as: MAX’D OUT KICKS 2225 PUMALO STREET #276 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92404 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); ADORTHUS CHERRY 2225 PUMALO STREET #276 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92404
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: APR 15, 2021
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ ADORTHUS CHERRY, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/21/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202109MT

FBN 20210006318
The following person is doing business as: EMPIRE TRANSPORTATION 14840 EBONY PL FONTANA, CA 92335 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); NINEONINE TRANSPORTATION, INC. 14840 EBONY PL FONTANA, CA 92335
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ EMMANUEL LIZARRAGA, PRESIDENT
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/15/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202110
FBN 20210006317
The following person is doing business as: THE TUTORING TEACHER 7619 SANDPIPER COURT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); ANNA O’BRIEN-KINSEY 7619 SANDPIPER COURT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ ANNA O’BRIEN-KINSEY
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/15/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202111MT

FBN 20210006413
The following person is doing business as: VIP SHUTTERS 845 W VALLEY BLVD #29 COLTON, CA 92324 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); JOSE M MORALES LEON 845 W VALLEY BLVD #29 COLTON, CA 92324
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JOSE M. MORALES LEON, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/17/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202112MT

FBN 20210006470
The following person is doing business as: ALCARAZ TRANSPORT 357 S ASHFOD AVENUE RIALTO, CA 92376 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); CARLOS H ALCARAZ VERDUZCO 357 S ASHFORD AVENUE RIALTO, CA 92376
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: APR 27, 2018
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ CARLOS H. ALCARAZ VERDUZCO, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/18/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202113MT

FBN 20210006610
The following person is doing business as: CORSINI COACHING AND CONSULTING 2492 TROJAN WAY UPLAND, CA 91786 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); JIREH’
The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JULIA CORSINI VAZQUEZ, MANAGING MEMBER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/22/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202114

FBN 20210006611
The following person is doing business as: GARMENTS OF PRAISE 2492 TROJAN WAY UPLAND, CA 91786 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); JIREH’S ENTERPRISES LLC 2492 TROJAN WAY UPLAND, CA 91786
The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JULIA CORSINI VAZQUEZ, MANAGING MEMBER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/22/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/02/2021, 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021 CNBB26202115

FBN 20210006385
The following person is doing business as: RIVAS TRANSPORTATION 4620 LEROY ST SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92404 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); JUAN ANTONIO RIVAS ORELLANA 4620 LEROY ST SAN BERNARDINO,CA 92404
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JUAN ANTONIO RIVAS ORELLANA, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/17/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021, 07/30/2021 CNBB27202101MT

FBN 20210006561
The following person is doing business as: H&J LAWN AND GARDEN 11535 RECHE CANYON RD COLTON, CA 92324 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); HECTOR M SALAZAR 11535 RECHE CANYON RD COLTON, CA 92324
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: 08/05/2016
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ HECTOR M SALAZAR, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/21/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021, 07/30/2021 CNBB27202102IR

FBN 20210006609
The following person is doing business as: OBLIVION DESIGN 6387 REDHEAD WAY FONTANA, CA 92336 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); VALERY ADAMS 6387 REDHEAD WAY FONTANA, CA 92336; GLORIA BECERRA GARCIA 6387 REDHEAD WAY FONTANA, CA 92336
The business is conducted by: A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ VALERY ADAMS, GENERAL PARTNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/28/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021, 07/30/2021 CNBB27202103MT

FBN 20210006837
The following person is doing business as: ZORAM LUNA REALTY GROUP; ZORAM REALTY GROUP; ZORAM REAL ESTATE GROUP; ZORAM LUNA REAL ESTATE GROUP 10535 FOOTHILL BLVD #460 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); ZORAM LUNA 10535 FOOTHILL BLVD #460 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
The business is conducted by: OWNER
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ ZORAM LUNA, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 07/01/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021, 07/30/2021 CNBB27202104MT

FBN 20210006905
The following person is doing business as: TOP DOG MOBILE GROOMING 7020 NOVARA PL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); TAIYLOR V GWIN 7020 NOVARA PL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91710
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ TAIYLOR V.GWIN, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 07/02/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021, 07/30/2021 CNBB27202105MT

FBN 20210006907
The following person is doing business as: CREATIVE CUTZ & STYLES 1638 E. WASHINGTON ST COLTON, CA 92324 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); JEREMI J MASSEY 1638 E. WASHINGTON ST COLTON, CA 92324
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: MAR 15, 2016
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JEREMI J. MASSEY, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 07/02/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/09/2021, 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021, 07/30/2021 CNBB27202106MT
AFFIDAVIT
Notice
of
NAHIM GOVERNMENT PASSPORT
Nation of American Hebrew Israelite Monarchy referred to hereafter as, “NAHIM”,
attests it was established January 1, 2013 in the San Bernardino County, the California State,
as an “Independent Sovereign Government”, authorized by ‘law to exist pursuant to,
“Luther v. Borden US !,12;.LED 581. 1st Amendment Article 1l, 10th Amendment, & 11th Amendment.
‘’NAHIM’’ attest, the NAHIM GOVERNMENT PASSPORT is our “OFFICIAL IDENTIFICATION.” We have created our passport for the purposes of traveling worldwide, by air, land or sea; afforded the protection of “SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY” under the laws of the United States Constitution. We are centered on creating friendly relationships and communication with other countries worldwide for the ‘purpose of ministering salvation and the gospel of our heavenly father who is ‘OUR KING” Yhoah Ehyeh the creator of the heaven & earth in their countries.
‘’NAHIM’’ attest, the NAHIM Govemment is “Not” affiliated with the U.S. Government, nor any of it’s law enforcement agencies, yet we share the same goals of “HONORING/OBEYING’ the U.S. Constitution. All of our passport holders. “ARE AMERICAN BORN CITIZENS”.
This Affidavit of Notice can.be refuted by “ANYONE” within 30 days in a court of law by affidavit using U.S. Constitutional laws “ONLY” signed under perjury and notarized in the presence of a notary public proving the NAHIM Government passport is by U.S. Constitutional law “UNLAWFUL.” Should NO ONE refute this affidavit within the given 30 days of receiving it in a court of law, it is then DECLARED”, THE NAHIM GOVERNMENT PASSPORT IS A LAWFUL “SOVEREIGN PASSPORT TO POSSESS UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS WHICH AUTHORIZES ITS EXISTENCE
AND USE THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES AND ABROAD.
Send your Affidavit of refute to:
E. Sog
NAHIM Government
General Delivery, San Bernardino, Ca 92402
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on 07/02, 07/09, 7/16 & 07/23, 2021
FBN 20210005949
The following person is doing business as GARNISH PIZZA & GRILL 7890 HAVEN AVE. UNIT 15 & 16 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730:
NATION FOOD SERVICE INC 7890 HAVEN AVE. UNIT 15 & 16 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
This Business is Conducted By: A CORPORATION REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA C4264978
BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
S/ PARVINDER SINGH
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 6/3/2021
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Began Transacting Business: APRIL 10, 1990
County Clerk, Deputy I6764
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code). Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on 07/02, 07/09, 7/16 & 07/23, 2021
FBN 20210006061
The following person is doing business as OPTIMA REEFER SERVICE 18960 CAJON BLVD SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92407: OPTIMA REEFER SERVIC, LLC 18960 CAJON BLVD SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92407
This Business is Conducted By: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA 202114810451
BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
S/ JOSE F. VALENCIANO GUTIERREZ
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 6/08/21
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Began Transacting Business: N/A
County Clerk, Deputy
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code). Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on 07/02, 07/09, 7/16 & 07/23, 2021
FBN 20210006059
The following person is doing business as OPEN DOOR REALTY & INVESTMENT 8291 UTICA AVE STE A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
ROSA M ESTRADA 8291 UTICA AVE STE A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 [and] RICARDO CASTRO 8291 UTICA AVE STE A RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
This Business is Conducted By: A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
BY SIGNING BELOW, I DECLARE THAT ALL INFORMATION IN THIS STATEMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT. A registrant who declares as true information, which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of a crime. (B&P Code 17913) I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
S/ ROSA M ESTRADA
This statement was filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 6/8/2021
I hereby certify that this is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office. Began Transacting Business: N/A
County Clerk, Deputy
NOTICE- This fictitious business name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see section 14400 et. Seq. Business & Professions Code). Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on 07/02, 07/09, 7/16 & 07/23, 2021

FBN 20210007079
The following person is doing business as: SAYULITA 369 1315 HARD STREET UNIT B SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); CESAR A. SIGALA ORTIZ 1315 HARDT STREET UNIT B SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ CESAR A SIGALA ORTIZ, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 07/08/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021, 07/30/2021, 08/06/2021 CNBB28202101SN

FBN 20210006838
The following person is doing business as: BEE CUTE FASHION 15764 COUNTY CLUB DR CHINO HILLS, CA 91709 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); [ MAILING ADDRESS 311 W CIVIC CENTER DR SANTA ANA, CA 92701]; MINDY RODRIGUEZ 15764 COUNTY CLUB DR CHINO HILLS, CA 91709; ELIZABETH M SALAZAR 15764 COUNTY CLUB DR. CHINO HILLS, CA 91709
The business is conducted by: A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ MINDY RODRIGUEZ, GENERAL PARTNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 07/01/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021, 07/30/2021, 08/06/2021 CNBB282021002CV

FBN 20210006385
The following person is doing business as: RIVAS TRANSPORTATION 4620 LEROY ST SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92404 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); JUAN ANTONIO RIVAS ORELLANA 4620 LEROY ST SAN BERNARDINO,CA 92404
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JUAN ANTONIO RIVAS ORELLANA, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 06/17/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021, 07/30/2021, 08/06/2021 CNBB28202103MT

FBN 20210007041
The following person is doing business as: CHERRY REGISTRATION 14976 FOOTHILL BLVD UNIT #300 FONTANA, CA 92335 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ); GABRIELA J ALVARADO 14976 FOOTHILL BLVD UNIT #300 FONTANA, CA 92335
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ GABRIELA J ALVARADO, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 07/08/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021, 07/30/2021, 08/06/2021 CNBB28202104MT

FBN 20210007054
The following person is doing business as: CHALECO’S LOGISTICS 461 E. REDLANDS BLVD SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 ( COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS );[ MAILING ADDRESS 700 E. WASHINGTON BLVD COLTON, CA 92324]; JOSE G VALDEZ GALINDO 700 E. WASHINGTON ST. SPC #21 COLTON, CA 92324
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JOSE G. VALDEZ GALINDO, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 07/08/2021
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 07/16/2021, 07/23/2021, 07/30/2021, 08/06/2021 CNBB28202105IR

You can download PDFs of the early and late final editions of the July 9 San Bernardino County Sentinel by clicking on the blue portals below.

Sentinel 07-09-21

Sentinel July 9 2021

By Mark Gutglueck
The recent departure of Rosemary Hoerning as Upland city manager cost the city’s taxpayers $235,903, the amount of money that was conferred upon her as a severance package. Nevertheless, for some, there is hope that the city’s residents could, as a consequence of her departure, receive a collective windfall of several million dollars in upcoming years, based upon the savings they stand to reap in terms of reductions in their future trash hauling rates.
Prior to her departure, sources at City Hall tell the Sentinel, Hoerning was on the verge of advising the city council it should simply accept and approve the rate increases the city’s refuse hauler is seeking to impose on the city’s residents and businesses.
The City of Upland has been tied into Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. since 2000, when it held a competitive bid process with regard to what garbage hauler would get the city franchise to provide trash disposal service. Burrtec prevailed in that bid process, and it displaced the former trash service provider, Waste Management, Inc., the following year, 2001. That franchise contract was a relatively straightforward one which ran for a specific set of years, in this case three.
In 2004, however, with the assistance of then-Mayor John Pomierski, Burrtec managed to obtain from the city a “seven-year rolling evergreen” enhancement to the franchise contract. That provision committed the city to keeping Burrtec as its garbage pick-up provider at a minimum for seven years from that date, and it also meant that unless the city gave the company notice that it was initiating the seven-year wind-down of the contract by June 30 of any given year, the contract was automatically extended by one more year on July 1. Thus, at any given time, unless Upland city officials initiated that wind-down, Burrtec had a guarantee that it would retain the city trash hauling franchise for seven more years. The justification for conferring this advantage on the company was that it allowed Burrtec a seven-year period to amortize any debt it might have accrued as a consequence of buying equipment needed to provide Upland with assorted trash-handling services.
In the early stages of Pomierski’s tenure as mayor, Hoerning was an Upland employee. Hoerning had first become a municipal employee in 1985, when she was hired into the City of Ontario’s public works division on the basis of an internship she was doing there in her final year at Cal Poly Pomona where she was obtaining her civil engineering degree. She progressed professionally in Ontario and then went to Upland, where she worked as the second-highest ranking public works division staff member, but hit the top of her head against a glass ceiling, as Rob Turner monopolized Upland’s city engineer/public works director post throughout her first tenure there. In 2008 she left Upland for Redlands, where she first served as the municipal utilities and engineering director, eventually acceding to the position of director of public works and city engineer there.
In 2011, Turner retired, at which point Hoerning returned to Upland, moving into the public works director/city engineer assignment.
During Hoerning’s more than three-year absence from Upland, Acquanetta Warren had been moved into Hoerning’s old position of assistant public works director. Warren had been a municipal employee in Upland since 1991, a member of the Fontana City Council since 2002 and Fontana mayor since 2010. She was given the assistant public works director post less as a result of her skill level and more because of her political status and association with John Pomierski, Upland’s mayor from 2000 until 2011. Pomierski was indicted on political corruption charges in 2011, pleaded guilty in 2012, and was thereafter sentenced to two years in federal prison.
Hoerning had extensive training, licensing and experience in engineering, in particular civil engineering, whereas Warren was not an engineer and had virtually no technical expertise in civil engineering or engineering of any kind. As a consequence, Hoerning upon returning to Upland in 2011 as the department director delegated to Warren those matters that fell under the department of public works’ purview that required little or no engineering know-how or understanding, those being, essentially, maintenance of the city’s trees and parks as well as overseeing the provision of the city’s trash service. This freed Hoerning to devote herself in large measure to the more intensive aspects of being public works director, such as engineering, road construction and maintenance, and the city’s water division. This left Warren in a position of authority over municipal functions, subject to little or no professional supervision.
In Fontana, as in Upland, Burrtec is the franchised trash hauler. As such, Burrtec had a two-fold interest in ingratiating itself with Warren. One of Warren’s primary political backers has been Burrtec, which over the course of her political career has supplied her with more than $20,000 in donations to her various electioneering funds, provided variously from the company, its owners and employees.
Under the California Government Code, elected government officials are at liberty to take money from a donor and participate as an elected official in a decision – a vote – relating to that donor. Under the California Government Code, appointed or hired government officials are not permitted to take money from a donor and participate in the decision-making process involving that donor. Thus, in her capacity as a member of the city council or as mayor in Fontana, Warren could vote, as she did, to perpetuate Burrtec’s franchise arrangement or approve its rate increases on Fontana residences and businesses, even though she was a recipient of substantial political contributions from Burrtec. As an appointed/hired official in Upland, however, Warren was not legally allowed to participate in the decision-making process relating to Burrtec in Upland, based upon the donations she had received from Burrtec.
Nevertheless, as Upland assistant public works director, Warren was called upon repeatedly to deal with trash-related issues. She neither declared that she had a conflict of interest, legal or otherwise, in handling matters related to Burrtec in Upland, nor did she recuse herself from doing so. Hoerning and other administrative, managerial and elected officials in Upland were either unaware of the money Warren had taken from Burrtec or did not recognize that it was a violation of the law for her to have taken that money from Burrtec and to involve herself in any matters relating to Burrtec in Upland. They made no effort to prevent her from engaging in that conflict of interest, which is prohibited under Government Code Section 84308.
In 2013, Upland City Hall was staggering under severe economic challenges as its expenses in meeting payroll demands and providing municipal services were outrunning revenue to the city. The city council appointed a blue-ribbon committee to look at the city’s options to rejuvenate itself economically. That committee came up with a host of recommendations, among which were that where possible the city should seek to rebid its various contracts to see where cost savings could be had.
Simultaneously, public discussion in Upland turned to, among other things, the consideration that the city at that point had gone 13 years without conducting an open bid on its trash franchise arrangement. Over the succeeding months, discontent within a segment of the community grew, arising out of the perception that the lack of a competitive bidding process was allowing Burrtec to impose higher rates on Upland’s customers than would be the case if the city had the option of providing the franchise to any of a host of other companies that would be willing to underbid Burrtec. That resident discomfiture was exacerbated by the revelation that came about, because of the public discussion, of the 7-year evergreen clause in the contract. By the spring of 2014, a sizable contingent of residents led by then-Councilman Glenn Bozar, were demanding that the city initiate the 7-year wind-down of the franchise with Burrtec and undertake at the earliest opportunity an open bidding process.
Warren inserted herself into the matter. Together with Burrtec Vice President Mike Arreguin, she structured an arrangement whereby the city avoided the possible termination of its relationship with Burrtec. That arrangement called for foregoing the open franchise bidding process, and suspending for five years the city’s right to initiate the wind-down, such that it would need to wait at least until 2019 to give Burrtec notice of wishing to start the seven-year process of ending the franchise contract. In exchange, Burrtec offered the city free street sweeping service, free disposal of medical sharps, i.e., syringes, and an annual $200,000 contribution toward refurbishing the city’s alleyways. The medical sharps disposal, street sweeping service and alley repair programs would remain in place, Burrtec said, until such time as Upland officials declared they were going to trigger the seven-year wind-down.
Noting that acceptance of the deal would mean Burrtec was to retain the city’s trash hauling franchise at least until June 2026 and there would be no bidding on the trash franchise in Upland for a quarter of a century, Bozar and the other competitive bid advocates refused to relent, calling for the city to signal it wanted the wind-down to begin so a competitive bid process could be initiated.
At that point, Arreguin, guided in some measure by Warren, assured the city council that in exchange for not initiating the wind-down of the franchise contract the city had with Burrtec and not moving toward a rebidding of the franchise contract, his company would give the City of Upland an absolute “guarantee” that the trash hauling rates adjusted for Upland that year, 2014, would be “locked-in” for seven years, until July 1, 2021. This guarantee, Arreguin said, was irrevocable, and it constituted, he maintained, a gamble on the part of his company that in the following seven years there would be no developments that would cause his company’s operating costs to escalate, such as rising landfill use rates, state or federal mandates or law changes pertaining to refuse hauling that would increase his company’s expenses, or changes in the recycling industry that would either increase the cost of dealing with recyclables or lower the price his company could get for selling the recyclable material it was collecting. If his company lost that bet, Arreguin said, the City of Upland and its residents and businesses would prove the winners because their trash rates would remain the same.
The city council as it was then composed, voted 4-to-1, with Mayor Ray Musser, Councilmen Brendan Brandt and Gino Filippi and Councilwoman Debbie Stone prevailing and Councilman Bozar dissenting, to forego the competitive bid process, grant the continuation of Burrtec’s franchise at least through June 2026, and accept the street sweeping, medical sharps disposal and alley maintenance offers, along with Burrtec’s assurance of having the 2014 rates locked in until 2021.
In 2016, Acquanetta Warren left Upland somewhat abruptly, in a move that was not fully explained beyond a statement that she was voluntarily retiring. When she did so, she wiped the memory banks of her city-issued computer at her workstation within the City of Upland’s public works division clean, such that all of the files relating to her function while she was a city employee in Upland were rendered unrecoverable.
Later in 2016, the California Legislature passed and then-Governor Jerry Brown signed into law Senate Bill 1383, which pertains to the handling of food waste, also referred to as organic waste. Provisions of Senate Bill 1383 complicated the function of trash haulers. Senate Bill 1383 used the amount of organics disposed of in 2014 as a baseline to set the goal of a 75 percent annual reduction statewide by 2025.
In 2018, the Upland City Council terminated then-City Manager Jeannette Vagnozzi, elevating Hoerning from the position of public works director to the even more demanding position of interim city manager.
Also beginning in 2018, the People’s Republic Of China, which was by far the largest purchaser/recipient of recyclable materials originating in the United States, banned many scrap materials and reduced its acceptance of virtually all others unless they met a strict contamination rate of no more than 0.5 percent. Contamination rates of U.S. recyclables before sorting vary from place to place, and can range higher than 25 percent.
In 2019, Burrtec found itself financially squeezed on one side with the rising costs of preparing to meet California’s Senate Bill 1383 mandates, which meant it would have to bear increasing organic substance-handling charges including purchasing food waste tubs, and on the other side with seeing the revenue it could achieve by selling recyclable materials diminished or eliminated entirely. The company appealed to those municipal jurisdictions, including Upland, where it had trash hauling franchises to allow it to increase the rates on its domestic and business customers. In making its approach to Upland on that score, the company made no mention of its 2014 commitment to lock in its trash-hauling rates in the City of Gracious Living in exchange for the city not rebidding the trash hauling franchise contract. At that point, four of the five members of the city council in 2014 were no longer in office. Only then-Mayor Debbie Stone, who had been heavily supported by Burrtec in terms of donations to her political war chest, remained on the council. When the request by Burrtec for the increase in customer rates was made in 2019, Stone made no effort to inform her colleagues on the council at that point, none of whom had been party to the 2014 vote to extend the Burrtec franchise contract until 2021, that the company had committed to keeping the 2014 rates in place until 2021.
As public works director, Hoerning headed a division that had overarching authority pertaining to refuse handling in the city. Nevertheless, from the time she had returned to Upland in 2011, she had given the trash issue little scrutiny, having delegated that matter to Warren and others in the department while she was engrossed with other public works, capital improvement and infrastructure matters. Upon becoming city manager, she had even less time to devote to how the city was to ensure garbage generated by the city’s residents and commercial enterprises was handled. She did not involve herself in making an evaluation of Burrtec’s request in 2019 to increase its rates, did not examine the record with regard to Burrtec’s 2014 commitment and had a city consultant, R3, which had no knowledge of the 2014 commitment to lock in rates until 2021, evaluate the Burrtec request. R3, making a finding that Burrtec, like virtually every other trash hauler in the state, was being beset with the vicissitudes of the trash hauling industry, said the rate increases Burrtec was requesting were called for and justified, and recommended that the city grant them. With only Councilman Rudy Zuniga dissenting, the city council in January 2019 gave Burrtec the rate increases as requested.
Earlier this year, Burrtec gave indication it was going to once again seek to up its service rates. Hoerning signaled she was amenable to the increases.
On March 31, 2021, however, Hoerning came to what was essentially the end of the line with Upland, when at a specially called meeting the city council voted unanimously to place her on paid administrative leave. Ultimately, four weeks later, she and the city came to terms on a separation agreement, by which she was provided with a $235,903 severance stipend, plus a cash equivalency of her sick leave and vacation time accumulated to that point.
On April 26, 2021 the city council considered setting a hearing date for a further adjustment to be made to service rates charged by Burrtec to Upland’s residential and commercial customers. Without Hoerning to usher Burrtec’s proposal to have rates upped by the amount the company deems appropriate, discussion turned to an analysis of tipping rates, that is the amount charged for dumping trash at landfills, the consumer price index in Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties, a comparison of the service fees charged by trash hauling franchisees in surrounding cities and a need for an analysis of the proposed rates before they are approved. On a motion by Councilwoman Shannan Maust, seconded by Councilman Zuniga, the item was tabled, that is deferred, until what was then an indefinite future date.
That delay was not one welcomed by Burrtec. Rather than watching helplessly as the city council is stampeded into accepting the rate increases as proposed, city residents now have the opportunity to explore all of the disposal options open to the city and its residents rather than that one which is in Burrtec’s interest. Furthermore, certain residents intend to make the city council aware of a number of peculiarities with respect to the way Burrtec is operating. Those, when taken together with other considerations, demonstrate that Burrtec, by utilizing landfills outside of San Bernardino County which are on the order of two times the distance of the landfill most logically and immediately available to Upland, is not only artificially increasing the cost the city ultimately pays to bury its trash but is making it so that Upland’s ratepayers are missing out on a subsidization San Bernardino County offers for using local landfills.
The city’s current solid waste rate structure is based on a four-component system, consisting of a service fee, disposal fee also know as a tipping fee, a processing fee for recyclables and organics and the city’s service program fee, by which the city gets a piece of the action of the trash collection revenue. Of note is that in the initial stages of the City of Upland’s relationship with Burrtec, particularly in the first three years after the city entered into its franchise deal with the company in 2000 and the company began operating in the city in 2001, as part of the effort to secure and maintain the trash hauling franchise, Burrtec assented to the inclusion of language in the contract that gave the city and its residents an assurance that steps would be taken to secure trash disposal rates – that is the tipping fees that Burrtec would pay to dispose of trash at landfills which ultimately would be passed back to the city’s residents and businesses – that were the lowest available.
At that time, Burrtec held the contract with San Bernardino County to operate and manage all of the county’s landfills. Thus, Burrtec then had an incentive to steer trash originating in any of the cities where it also had trash hauling contracts, such as Upland, to a San Bernardino County landfill.
In April 2013, however, Burrtec lost out in a competitive bid process to Athens Services, doing business as Arakelian Enterprises, Inc., to manage the county’s landfill system. Thereafter, it was no longer in Burrtec’s financial interest to continue to dispose of trash in San Bernardino County landfills. Instead, Burrtec saw a revenue enhancement by increasing the amount of rubbish disposed at the Salton City Landfill it operates in Imperial County.
Unknown to Upland officials, in 2014, the year after Burrtec lost the contract to operate San Bernardino County’s landfills, the company, with the connivance of Warren, outmaneuvered Upland officials, including Hoerning, by altering its contract with the city.
Even as some Uplanders and then-City Councilman Bozar were considering ending the franchise contract with Burrtec or otherwise rebidding the franchise contract to see if lower service costs could be had for Upland’s residents and businesses, Burrtec convinced then-Mayor Ray Musser and Bozar’s three other council colleagues that the city would benefit by continuing the ongoing franchise arrangement and locking in the 2014 rates for seven years thereafter.
At that point, Warren slipped into the franchise contract revamped language that favored Burrtec and put Upland at a disadvantage. Hoerning, who had deferred the decision-making process on trash issues to Warren, was not paying attention, and did not seem particularly concerned about giving Warren autonomy in dealing with Burrtec, despite the copious amounts of money Burrtec was donating to Warren’s campaign account.
The original contract that Burrtec had with Upland was worded in this way: “Collector shall pay for solid waste disposal by collector at a city-reviewed facility unless otherwise mutually agreed by collector and [the] city. Collector shall transport and deliver to a processing facility or facilities all recyclables including recyclables from single-family households, and recyclable bulky waste. Collector shall select facilities which result in the least expensive processing option for the city, taking into account any applicable tipping fees, revenue sharing and transportation costs thereto, consistent with public health and safety, diversion provisions of Assembly Bill 939, and collector’s obligations hereunder.”
This was changed to: “Collector shall pay for solid waste disposal by collector unless otherwise mutually agreed by collector and [the] city. Collector shall transport and deliver to a processing facility or facilities all recyclables including recyclables from single-family households, and recyclable bulky waste. Collector shall make reasonable business efforts to select facilities which create the most economic value for the city, taking into account any applicable tipping fees, revenue sharing and transportation costs thereto, consistent with public health and safety, diversion provisions of Assembly Bill 939, and collector’s obligations hereunder.”
Warren managed to put that language change into the contract without anyone noticing.
Specifically, the language was amended to eliminate the requirement that the place where the refuse is to be processed must be approved by the city and the requirement that the facility or facilities selected had to provide the least expensive processing option for the city. Instead Burrtec’s financial interest was given a higher priority over minimizing costs for Upland residential and commercial customers such that Burrtec was given direction that it need only make a “reasonable effort… to select facilities which create the most economic value for the city.”
Until that time, Burrtec had been disposing of Upland’s trash at the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill in Rialto, which entailed a 16.6 mile drive from Upland and a $29 per ton tipping fee. Beginning in 2014, as soon as the new language was in place, Burrtec began disposing of Upland’s trash at the El Sobrante Landfill in Corona, involving a 28.7-mile trip and a tipping fee of $43 to $45 per ton or to the Badlands Landfill in Moreno Valley, which required a 31.3 mile trip and a tipping fee of $43 to $45 per ton.
It is worth noting that neither Burrtec nor city staff disclosed in the documents provided to the public or the council the significant language changes to the contract which greatly limited the city’s authority to select the disposal facilities, which impacted the rates. The transportation cost increases and the rate increases from the 2014 switch from the nearer San Bernardino County landfill to the two landfills in Riverside County were folded into the 2014 rates that were “locked in,” supposedly until 2021.
In 2015, the City of San Bernardino resolved to privatize its municipal sanitation division, and ultimately selected Burrtec to serve as its franchised trash hauler. Burrtec assumed that role in 2016.
In addition to holding the San Bernardino and Upland franchises, Burrtec serves 14 other of the county’s 24 incorporated municipalities – Adelanto, Apple Valley, Barstow, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Highland, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, Twentynine Palms, Victorville, Yucca Valley and Yucaipa – as well as dozens of its unincorporated communities, including Amboy, Angeles Oaks, Baker, Barton Flats, Bloomington, Cima, Crestline, Daggett, Del Rosa, Devore, Dumont Dunes, East Highlands, El Rancho Verde, Forest Falls, Fort Irwin, Halloran, Helendale, Hinkley, Kelso, Lake Arrowhead, Landers, Lenwood, Lucerne Valley, Ludlow, Mentone, Mountain Pass, Mt. Baldy, Newberry Springs, Nipton, Oak Glen, Running Springs, San Antonio Heights, Silver Lakes and Yermo. This makes Burrtec San Bernardino County’s largest trash hauler.
In the aftermath of Burrtec’s loss of the county contract to run San Bernardino County’s landfills, Burrtec’s corporate officers, out of resentment toward county officials and pique at the victor in the competitive bid process, Athens Services, diverted as much of the trash it collected in San Bernardino County out of San Bernardino County’s landfills as possible, taking the revenue that would have fallen to the county in tipping fees with it.
In 2016, Burrtec found itself obliged, because of a concerted effort by a group of San Bernardino County cities and communities, which did not include Upland, and the San Bernardino County government structure itself, to utilize San Bernardino County landfills. Late that year, Burrtec entered into a contractual agreement to dispose of 370,000 tons of the trash it collected in San Bernardino County to landfills in San Bernardino County. Another contractual agreement required that 180,000 of those 370,000 tons originate in the City of San Bernardino. Burrtec was thus under a mandate to dispose another 190,000 tons of trash it collected in San Bernardino County into San Bernardino County landfills.
In 2019 Burrtec was requesting that Upland – along with the other cities and communities it serviced in San Bernardino County and elsewhere – allow it to up its rates to offset its increasing costs in meeting the State of California’s mandates imposed on it by Senate Bill 1383 and to offset its declining revenue from the People’s Republic of China’s discontinuing purchase of the company’s recyclable materials. At the time that the Upland City Council went along with that request despite Burrtec’s 2014 commitment to maintain its service rates in Upland at 2014 levels until July 2021, Burrtec could have offered to dispose of the 46,851.32 tons of trash originating in Upland annually in San Bernardino County’s Mid-Valley Landfill, where the tipping fee for doing so was $31 per ton rather than the $49-to-$51 per ton it was paying to dispose of Upland’s refuse in Riverside County, thereby abiding by its commitment to keep Upland’s 2014 rates locked in. Banking on the Upland City Council’s lack of institutional memory about the 2014 commitment and/or the council’s lack of will to hold Burrtec to that commitment, Burrtec did not do so.
This year, while Hoerning was yet in the city manager’s saddle, Burrtec requested that the city grant it a 3.07 percent consumer price index increase to be applied to the service component fee and the disposal component (tipping) fee for Fiscal Year 2020-21 and a consumer price index increase of 1.62 percent to be applied to the service component fee and disposal component fee for 2021-22. Hoerning was amenable to that request and was on track to direct her successor as Upland’s public works director, Braden Yu, to recommend that the city council approve those requests. Hoerning’s departure, however, has created a situation, based on multiple considerations, which will likely entail Yu backing away from making such a recommendation.
A handful of residents have vowed to call Yu to account, including demanding his firing, if he does not make a comprehensive evaluation of the 2014 commitment by Burrtec to maintain its rates without increase until July 2021, the circumstances that led to the 2019 overriding of that commitment, the sleight of hand that was used in 2014 to remove the city’s ability to approve into which landfills the city’s trash is to be disposed and the city’s unilateral surrendering of the ability thereby to ensure that the city has passed through to it the lowest possible tipping fees. Those higher rates include the City of Upland not being provided with the trash disposal subsidization San Bernardino County provides, in the form of a per ton discount, to cities within its jurisdiction which utilize its landfills.
Those residents also want Yu to look into shortcomings in Burrtec’s recycling program which are also resulting in higher rates being paid by Upland trash service customers.
If Yu defaults to the position previously assumed by Hoerning, which was to accept without question or contesting the requests by Burrtec to increase its rates, those residents are prepared to wage a bruising battle in which they intend to put on display Yu’s greater loyalty to Burrtec than to the taxpayers paying his salary.
The Sentinel is informed that Burrtec has in recent years skimped on its recycling efforts to reduce the volume of recycling material taken out of the waste streams it processes and disposes of. Some time ago, Burrtec had acceded to a billing arrangement in Upland and elsewhere intended to encourage recycling. Under this arrangement, residential customers are provided with at least one barrel intended to contain trash bound for a landfill, which is black in color; at least one barrel intended to contain recyclable material, which is blue in color; and at least one green- or olive-colored barrel intended to contain so-called green waste, primarily grass clippings, plant prunings, leaves and the like that originate as part of the vegetative landscaping at a residence. To encourage homeowners to recycle as much as possible and divert green waste from landfills, no charge other than a basic recycling fee is made for the blue or green barrels and no charge applies for extra blue or green barrels requested by a customer. Additional black barrels trigger an added charge. With the refusal of the People’s Republic of China to accept recyclable materials, Burrtec, while now casting about for alternative places to sell the recyclables it has accumulating at its yards and facilities, is no longer able to sell the recyclables it has piling up, and both the collection of recyclables and separation of recyclables from the trash stream has now become for Burrtec a liability. As a consequence, the company consistently spurns customers who seek to obtain additional recycling bins or replacement recycling bins if they are stolen or damaged.
As a consequence, Burrtec’s customers, including many in Upland, find themselves in the position of having to jettison their recyclables into their trash containers. Though this compromises and undercuts the recycling effort that California cities are mandated to engage in, it is financially beneficial to Burrtec in two ways. First, it decreases the recyclable material that is accumulating at Burrtec’s company yards and facilities, for which it has no ready buyer, and which represents an eventual storage crisis and storage cost. It also increases the amount of refuse being disposed of in Riverside County landfills, in particular the El Sobrante Landfill and the Badlands Landfill. By ensuring that Riverside County’s landfills are receiving ever greater tonnages of trash from San Bernardino County, this frees Riverside County up to dispose of a corresponding amount of trash originating in the southeastern portion of Riverside County, where Burrtec has trash hauling franchises or contracts, into the Salton City Landfill, which Burrtec operates in Imperial County. The intensified use of the Salton City Landfill by cities and communities in Riverside County generates for Burrtec, as that facility’s operator, revenue.
In January 2020, when the Upland City Council was straitjacketed by Hoerning into going along with Burrtec’s request to up its rates, only Councilman Rudy Zuniga resisted. Then-Mayor Debbie Stone, then-councilman Ricky Felix, then-Councilman Bill Velto and Councilwoman Janice Elliott voted to give Burrtec the requested rate increases.
Since that time, Stone was voted out of office and replaced by Velto, Felix left the city council and two new members have been elected, First District Councilwoman Shannan Maust and Third District Councilman Carlos Garcia. Shortly after making the 2020 vote, Velto publicly acknowledged having given Burrtec the rate increase out of “ignorance,” and admitted he was not aware of the 2014 commitment by Burrtec to lock-in the 2014 rates until 2021.
Those close to City Hall report that earlier this year, while Upland was yet under Hoerning’s guidance, she was pushing city officials to rubberstamp Burrtec’s pending request for the 3.07 percent increase in rates for Fiscal Year 2020-21 and an increase of 1.62 percent for 2021-22. That was to follow Hoerning’s accommodation of the rate increase Burrtec was granted in January 2020.
Garcia and Maust both appear far less ready to accept Burrtec’s claims of financial hardship at face value, and both were key votes in the decision to sack Hoerning, one of whose transgressions was acceding to the best interests of Burrtec while neglecting the competing financial interests of the city’s residents. Zuniga remains, based upon certain public statements he made in April, unconvinced that Burrtec is providing first class service, and he gave indication he is willing to initiate the wind-down of the company’s seven-year duration franchise rollover at the earliest opportunity.
What is more, Burrtec’s hiding of the change in the contract language in 2014 that allowed it to up the rates it charges has now been exposed.
Similarly, that Burrtec is burying Upland’s trash at two landfills in Riverside County at a tipping fee that is $18-to-$20 per ton higher than what it could dispose of that trash in a San Bernardino County landfill, representing a $843,323.76-to-$937,026.40 greater cost annually that is passed through to members of the Upland community is no longer a secret.
Against that backdrop, a growing number of Upland residents are hopeful that the current Upland City Council, with its traditional practice of rubberstamping anything placed in front of it by city staff, may not, when it gets around once more to considering the matter, be inclined to impose on its constituents the rate increases Burrtec is requesting.
The city council is scheduled to take up Burrtec’s request to up the rates Upland residents and businesses pay for trash service on August 9.

In what may be more than a footnote to the indescribably sad case of the death of Erika Lloyd, who perished in the Mojave Desert in the summer of 2020, it was publicly learned this week that her car had been stolen after she drove it into a roadside berm near the intersection of Shelton Road and Two Mile Road in the remote desert area of Wonder Valley on June 16 of last year.
Lloyd expired while she was on a 1,687-mile sojourn to “recharge” in the aftermath of losing her business due to the COVID-19 shutdown during which she wandered into a remote section of the unforgiving Mojave Desert.
Unclear at this time and perhaps never to be known, but well within the realm of possibility, is that the action of two people – David Krough and Teala Campbell – may have indirectly contributed to Lloyd’s death. The displacement of the car by some two miles from where Lloyd apparently abandoned it and set out on foot before becoming disoriented and lost had the effect of drawing the search parties away from the spot where, seven months later, her skeletal remains were found.
Lloyd, who would now be 38, was 37 at the time of her disappearance. She worked as a beautician in the Northern California Walnut Creek community where she resided with her 12-year-old son.
Statements made by her friends and family suggest that the COVID-19 crisis, which had forced a closure of beauty salons and negatively impacted Lloyd’s cash flow, had left her in a state of depression. Early in the second week of June, Lloyd deleted the contents of her Facebook page. On Thursday, June 11, 2020, she embarked on what appears to have been a frenetic 1,689-mile misadventure which ultimately left her dead. That day, she left her son in the care of a friend in Walnut Creek and departed, driving her black 2006 Honda Accord, covering the roughly 533 miles between Walnut Creek and Joshua Tree National Park in something under 12 hours, and camped at the Jumbo Rocks campground on the night of June 11 and again on the night of Friday, June 12.
According to her sister-in-law, Lloyd was “under a lot of stress and wanted to get away and unplug.” At the time of her disappearance, there was a report one of Erika’s friends moved to Twentynine Palms in April 2020. There has been speculation that Lloyd had perhaps made the trip to see that person.
At the Jumbo Rocks campground, Lloyd made the acquaintance of two people, she told friends, one named “James” and the other “Christian.” Early on the morning of Saturday, June 13, leaving her camping gear at her Jumbo Rocks campsite in the care of James and Christian, Lloyd then drove the roughly 533 miles back to Walnut Creek, arriving later that day, and spent the night there with her son and her roommate. The following day, Sunday, June 14, she departed Walnut Creek, again without her son, to return to the Jumbo Rocks campground. Credible evidence suggests Lloyd re-arrived at Jumbo Rocks Campground in the late afternoon of June 14. In her journal that was recovered, Lloyd noted that James and Christian were not at the campground when she got there.
According to Lloyd’s mother, she spoke with her daughter for the last time on June 14 or June 15. She said Erika was “talking really fast” and it sounded like she was driving. There was no known telephonic contact between Lloyd and anyone after that.
Park rangers on Monday, June 15 came across Lloyd’s vandalized black 2006 Honda Accord in the parking area for the Indian Cove campground, some 21.9 miles from Jumbo Rocks but still within the confines of 1,234 square-mile Joshua Tree National Park. There was no camping equipment in the car or in its immediate vicinity when the rangers observed the vehicle. The windshield on the passenger’s side in the front had been broken, and the dashboard damaged. The rangers noted the vehicle’s presence in a report, and left a note on the car. That evening, the car had been removed.
The next day, Tuesday June 16, a video captured the car leaving the north entrance into/exit from Joshua Tree National Park at 1:20 p.m, and the car was later videoed passing a school in Twentynine Palms at 2:50 p.m.
On June 16, after being summoned by a report from a Wonder Valley resident, a California Highway Patrolman spotted Lloyd’s Accord parked on Shelton Road, east of Twentynine Palms, north of the intersection with Highway 62, facing south toward the highway, some 23 miles from Jumbo Rocks campground. The car was blocking the roadway such that it inhibited passage on Shelton Road, which is unpaved. The CHP summoned Twentynine Palms-based Bailey’s Auto Repair & Towing to tow the car. According to David Bailey, the proprietor of the tow company, the Accord’s rear window was broken, the front windshield was smashed on the passenger side, the airbag had deployed and the radio was damaged.
Bailey reported there was damage to the outside front of the vehicle in that the bottom of the radiator and the air conditioning condenser were pushed backwards as if the car had hit a very large object head-on. Bailey speculated that the car had run into a berm.
Beginning on June 16, Lloyd’s friends calling her cell phone encountered no answer. They continued to try to reach her.
On Wednesday, June 17, her family reported her missing, giving indication she might be in the area of Joshua Tree National Park. The San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department dispatched a helicopter to scour the area. That effort was not fruitful.
Lloyd’s camping gear was located at a camping site in Jumbo Rocks Campground. An expensive Yeti cooler she was not known to have owned was found among her possessions at the campsite.
The Morongo Basin Sheriff’s Station was put on a special alert to be on the lookout for any sightings of her throughout the entirety of the more than 3,000 square mile desert area that includes Joshua Tree, Joshua Tree National Park, Twentynine Palms, Yucca Valley and outlying areas. Park Rangers began searching areas within the park. Sheriff’s deputies, including ones with canines, searched areas at the entrance of the park and its periphery, as well as along Highway 62.
The Joshua Tree Search and Rescue Team, guided by Doug Billings, engaged in an effort to find her or spot any signs that she was in the area.
On June 19, Lloyd’s parents caught a flight from Maryland to California in an effort to help with and intensify the search for their daughter. They posted photos of her and posters alerting the public to her disappearance in the area within the national park as well as in and around Twentynine Palms and Wonder Valley.
Friends and family persisted in trying to reach her by calling her cell phone. On June 20, it was answered by a man who said he had found the phone on June 18 “on Cottonwood,” that is on Cottonwood Drive in Twentynine Palms.
Lloyd’s parents remained intent on finding Erika, and intensified their efforts, leasing space on billboards in the Morongo Valley to feature oversized and highly visible photos of their daughter and make notice of her being missing.
Billings, a mining and cave expert who is familiar with the area and possesses global positioning, mapping and data-cataloging equipment that allows him and the team he is working with to carry out a methodical survey of the vast desert landscape, had joined as a volunteer in the search effort. Much of that effort was carried out along Highway 62 and in the general area around Highway 62 and Shelton Road, as the searchers fanned out in ever-widening swaths. Those searches came up empty.
Seven months later, on Sunday January 31, 2021, Lloyd’s body was discovered by hikers in a field a quarter mile east of the 5200 block of Danby Road in Wonder Valley at a point roughly 2.2 miles northwest of where her car was found, some three-fourths of a mile west northwest from where she had left it near the intersection of Shelton Road and Two Mile Road.
While it can be dismissed as speculation and conjecture, had the search for Lloyd been centered at the location where she had actually abandoned her car, given that helicopters were used in combing the area, she might have been spotted in relatively short order, perhaps as early as June 17 or 18, at which point she might yet have been alive.
For months, it was the assumption of the search crews and authorities that Lloyd had been at the intersection of Shelton Road and Twentynine Palms Highway when she walked away from her car. The Sentinel has learned that in December, the sheriff’s department had come to the conclusion that someone other than Lloyd had driven the Accord to where it was found on June 16.
It was established that the damage to the front undercarriage of the car, the radiator and the air conditioning condenser resulted from the car hitting a sand berm near Shelton Road and Two Mile Road, most likely after 3 p.m. on June 16.
After Lloyd’s body was found, an eyewitness came forward to relate that on June 16, 2020 at approximately 4:50 pm, a woman fitting Lloyd’s description was wandering around in a disoriented state on the desert field in the area of Two Mile Road/Danby Road, near where her remains were found more than seven months later.
According to the sheriff’s department, around 6:30 p.m. on June 16, 2020, David Krough, then 27, and Teala Campbell, then 33, came across the Accord, which was lodged in the berm. Indications are that they did not see Lloyd in the vicinity of the vehicle, and assumed the car had been abandoned. They used a pickup truck with either a winch or a chain and hook to separate the Accord from the berm. It is believed that Campbell then sought to drive it south on Shelton Road. By the time the car had reached Twentynine Palms Highway, roughly 1.98 miles from where Lloyd had abandoned it, the car was severely overheating, and the couple abandoned the car in the middle of Shelton Road.
The sheriff’s department said that on June 6 of this year, it had identified Campbell and Krough as the individuals who had moved Lloyd’s car from where she had left it. An investigation ensued, and yesterday, July 8, both Krough and Campbell were arrested, and are now in custody at the West Valley Detention Center in Rancho Cucamonga. Krough, who has prior convictions, is being held on $50,000 bail for being a felon with a firearm and an additional $25,000 bail for vehicle theft. Campbell has prior convictions for burglary, a firearms violation, forgery, receiving stolen property and utility theft. She is being held in lieu of $1 million bail.
There are some contradictions in the evolving narrative relating to the case. It is indicated on the Bring Erika Home Facebook page that Campbell in some fashion cooperated with the authorities, and came forward to tell the sheriff’s department that she and Krough had moved the Accord on June 16, 2020. Nevertheless, she is subject to a $1 million bail hold. Another inconsistency is that the timeline given with regard to Lloyd’s disappearance indicated that the Highway Patrol was informed about the Accord blocking access onto Shelton Road from Highway 62 sometime around or shortly after 4 p.m. on June 16, 2020. According to the sheriff’s department, however, Krough and Campbell did not take the car until sometime after 6 p.m.
Doug Billings, whose intimate familiarity with the Mojave Desert has resulted in his being prevailed upon to lead searches there when individuals or parties go missing, led the June 2020 effort to locate Erika Lloyd.
Billings responded to whether he believed Erika Lloyd might have been found alive if Krough’s and Campbell’s attempted theft of Lloyd’s car had not occurred and the initial focus of the search had been at the point where she actually abandoned her car – at Shelton Road and Two Mile Road – such that those engaged in the search had not presumed that she had left her car on foot near Highway 62 and Shelton Road.
“I’m not sure that would have saved her life, as we were unaware of her true condition at the time of the accident,” Billings said. “She surely could have been lying in distress for 24 hours alive, and it is not impossible that Erika could have been saved. For sure, I think she would have been found by searchers much sooner. There would have been tracks to follow, and she was only three-fourths of a mile from her car, well inside an initial grid.”
Billings emphasized that the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department search effort was first rate.
“The San Bernardino County search teams are very good at what they do,” he said. “The focus of the actual search was hampered terribly in retrospect by this crime. The months of anguish on the family alone is unforgivable. The criminals easily could have made an anonymous tip as soon as they saw the news. Additionally, unknown amounts of limited resources could have gone somewhere else instead. It breaks my heart to see all the mishaps and wrongdoing that contributed to it all. The family suffers immensely.”
-Mark Gutglueck

The board of supervisors voted unanimously on Wednesday July 7 to have Undersheriff Shannon Dicus succeed John McMahon to serve as San Bernardino County’s 36th sheriff.
Accordingly, on July 16, the day McMahon’s resignation becomes official, Dicus will be sworn in to succeed McMahon and the 34 men who previously held the position of sheriff since the founding of the county in 1853.
There was some controversy with regard to the circumstance of Dicus’s appointment.
He is about to become the third straight sheriff to be appointed to the position as a consequence of a calculated resignation of his predecessor, a practice which has consistently conferred upon those appointees a political advantage which each has absolutely exploited. McMahon was himself appointed to the post in 2012, which followed the resignation of his predecessor, Rod Hoops. Hoops was appointed sheriff in 2009 when his predecessor, Gary Penrod, resigned. Hoops, running as an unelected incumbent in 2010, and McMahon, running as an unelected incumbent in 2014 and again in 2018, were both elected in large measure on the strength of their incumbencies as well as their de facto inheritance of a political machine that has existed since 1954 when Frank Bland was elected sheriff. Bland served as sheriff for 28 years, having been reelected six times. In 1982 Bland endorsed Floyd Tidwell, handing off to him the political machinery he controlled. In 1980, Tidwell endorsed his undersheriff, Dick Williams, who used the Bland political machine to gain election. Williams four years later endorsed Penrod, who was victorious, again with the assistance of the political machine inherited from Bland through Tidwell and Williams. So intimidating was that political machine and Penrod’s possession of it that no one challenged him in 1998, 2002 and 2006.
The board of supervisors in 2009 complied with Penrod’s recommendation that Hoops replace him, and that gave Hoops the power of incumbency as well as the support of the Bland political machine, which put Hoops easily over the top in the 2010 election. When Hoops resigned more than two years after that election and handpicked McMahon as his successor, the board of supervisors once again went along with the retiree’s designation, and McMahon proved unbeatable in the 2014 election with the assistance of the Bland political machine, so much so that no one deigned to run against him in 2018.
An issue brought up this time around was that the board of supervisors was again conferring a political advantage on another direct descendant of the Bland Dynasty, and that they are letting machine politics control the county. An appeal was made to them that they appoint an individual who would commit to not seeking reelection in 2022, the year the sheriff’s race is next scheduled to be held. In this way, it was suggested, an election among non-incumbents might be held in 2022 that would be untainted by incumbency or connection to a 68-year-duration political machine.
Congressman Pete Aguilar (Democrat-Redlands) was among those who expressed concern that conferring the sheriff’s position on an individual who would run for sheriff in the next election would provide that person with an unfair electoral edge. He called upon the board to appoint a placeholder who would not seek election in 2022.
In a letter to the board of supervisors, Aguilar asserted that “By virtue of title and experience, the appointed sheriff will have a strong advantage over any other candidate in the 2022 election, no matter the qualifications.”
That had no impact on the supervisors, who are themselves politicians, four of whom are Republicans in contrast to the Democrat Aguilar. The board collectively was unwilling to advocate a position counter to that of the interests of the Bland political machine, which has in the past and could be in the future harnessed to support individuals seeking political office other than that of sheriff, such as county supervisor. Phill Dupper and Cliff Harris, two individuals who applied to succeed McMahon and whom the board of supervisors made a public display on Wednesday of considering for appointment to the sheriff’s position, gave indication they were undecided in whether they would seek election in 2022. The board of supervisors interpreted Dicus’s confident assurance that he would seek election next year and had already begun forming his reelection team in a positive light, taking that as an indication he would provide the department with continuity of leadership. That was used by the board members as a part of the justification for appointing Dicus.
Four individuals had applied to be considered for the appointment to sheriff – Dicus, Dupper, Harris and William Loenhorst. There are a relatively narrow set of requirements to qualify to serve as sheriff, those being that one has to be a county resident, a registered voter and a holder of professional certification as a law enforcement officer. There was no question that Dicus, Dupper and Harris met that criteria, as Dicus has been a member of the sheriff’s department for nearly 30 years, Dupper is a lieutenant with the department currently and has been with the department a quarter of a century, Harris was employed by the department as a detective from 1984 to 1991 and subsequently worked with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, and all had certification by the California Police Officers Standards and Training Commission. Loenhorst claimed such certification, but by the time of the board’s specially-called meeting on Wednesday July 7 to interview the candidates and determine whether they would make a selection, confirmation of Loenhorst’s certification had not been obtained. He therefore did not take part in the forum that was set up, which allowed Dicus, Dupper and Harris, in that order, to provide a three-minute general statement followed by a round of questions from the individual supervisors.
Dicus, like both Dupper, from Loma Linda, and Harris, from San Bernardino, is homegrown in San Bernardino County, having graduated from high school in Twentynine Palms. He served in the U.S. Army for three years as a military policemen in the 101st Airborne Division, in which capacity he was deployed to the Middle East and South America. After his discharge from the Army, Dicus returned to San Bernardino County where he worked for the Office of Veterans Affairs as a police officer at the Jerry L Pettis Veterans Hospital in Loma Linda. He has been with the sheriff’s department for just under three decades. His father worked for the department.
He received his bachelor’s degree from California State University San Bernardino in criminal justice studies. He has a master’s degree in communication from California Baptist University.
Though the county pulled from its website a document which purported to provide a full range of the assignments Dicus had while working with the sheriff’s department, the Sentinel was able to reproduce some of that information. He was assigned at one time or another to the department’s corrections division at the Glen Helen Rehabilitation and West Valley Detention centers. He worked patrol out of the Apple Valley, Victorville, Barstow and Victor Valley sheriff’s stations. He worked in the department’s specialized investigations unit as a narcotics detective. He was assigned to the special weapons and tactics team, known as SWAT. He for a time worked in the department’s intelligence division, which was attached to the department’s command echelon, a position from which he and that unit’s investigators gathered compromising information relating to the county’s politicians, elected officials and community leaders, in particular the council members in the cities and towns which contract with the sheriff’s department to provide law enforcement services. He also had a supervisory assignment in the department’s technical services, communications and records divisions, as well as its bureau of administration.
With the 2017 retirement of Assistant Sheriff David Williams, who previously appeared to be on a trajectory to succeed McMahon as sheriff, an effort to groom Dicus as the next sheriff began. In the undersheriff post, he has immediate authority over the internal affairs division which is referred to in San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department parlance as the professional standards division, its civil liabilities division which goes hand-in-hand with professional standards, and the bureau of administration. Increasingly over the last year-and-a-half, Dicus has been taking on more and more of the hands-on management of the department that McMahon had formerly exercised as sheriff, such that he oversees the day-to-day operations of the sheriff’s department.
The 2021-22 county budget approved by the board of supervisors last month included $5.2 million to outfit the county’s sheriff’s deputies with body cameras.
Dicus told Supervisor Joe Baca, Jr., “I’m personally for body-worn cameras. We have to commit to the county process, which is a request-for-information and then a request-for-proposal. So, those timeframes are set forth based on the number of vendors that submit proposals to the county. In working with the [county] CEO on the current budget, we’ve allocated approximately $5 million to take on that effort. We’ve also done pilot programs as it relates to that. Body-worn cameras is a complicated process, not necessarily the body-worn cameras themselves, but the infrastructure which it takes to transfer that data across a county as large as San Bernardino. There are things in the ground that cause that information to be transferred at different speed rates in some places where we don’t have any infrastructure at all. In terms of the policies and procedures, it would require that all deputies use those. Our deputies are looking forward to using body-worn cameras. They do act professionally, and they do want body-worn cameras to provide that evidence when they are accused of doing things they may or may not have done. Retention polices are something we would certainly take a look at based on storage and whatever we’re able to afford as the county. I would certainly promote body-worn cameras for transparency to any of our community members and plan on sharing that information as these critical incidents occur.”
Alluding to changing societal perceptions in which larger segments of the society have come to hold law enforcement officers in low esteem, Supervisor Paul Cook asked Dicus, “How are you going to demonstrate your leadership so that they [the sheriff’s deputies working for him] have the confidence in you to do their job and to do it in accordance with the law and everything else, and quite frankly, put their lives on the line?”
Dicus responded, “I have gray hair for a reason. I have gray hair because I worry about the problems that they don’t need to worry about. I will back their play and make sure when they have to make those critical split-second decisions in these highly volatile times that they’re backed and taken care of to the best of my ability. Experience matters. Across this country you’re seeing a number of law enforcement executives leave law enforcement. They’re not leaving because they want to leave. They are leaving because of high-intensity politics. Red and blue matters more.”
Dicus, a Republican, as are a substantial majority of the department’s members, then said, “It’s not about red [Republicans] and blue [Democrats]. It’s about doing the right thing. Being the sheriff is about everyone else and not yourself. Those troops – we’re getting kids that are willing to do this job because they want to contribute to their communities, and it absolutely amazes me everyday based on what we are seeing in the news and all the negativity that’s out there – they come to and from everyday, and do the job. Number one, I plan to be highly accessible and make sure that they know that they’re appreciated.”
The board devoted roughly 29-and-one-half minutes to Dicus’s presentation and the questions he was asked; slightly more than 27 minutes to Dupper’s statement and the questions he fielded; and just about 28 minutes in hearing Harris’s presentation and hearing his answers to the supervisors’ questions.
Multiple individuals of influence weighed in on behalf of Dicus.
Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco recommended Dicus to the board. “I urge you to appoint Undersheriff Dicus to the office of sheriff by trusting the ability and integrity of Sheriff McMahon who has led his department in a positive direction and set the stage for continued success after his retirement,” Bianco said. “Undersheriff Dicus is a fair, honest, ethical proven law enforcement leader who has earned the respect and support of his department, San Bernardino County police chiefs and the Association of Riverside County Chiefs of Police and Sheriff.”
Grant Ward, the president of the Safety Employees Benefit Association, which represents San Bernardino County’s sheriff’s deputies, without making a direct recommendation indicated his union wanted a continuation of the department’s current administration and management, a tacit endorsement of Dicus.
San Bernardino County District Attorney Jason Anderson said, “I want to indicate that I support the appointment of Undersheriff Shannon Dicus. I’ve had the privilege and the pleasure of working the last two-and-a-half, almost three years with him. I’ve known him as a person. I certainly admire his resolve, his integrity and his ability to continue to lead the largest law enforcement agency in our county.”
Chris Catron, the president of the San Bernardino County Police Chiefs and Sheriffs Association, said, “I am here to… emphatically support and express our unwavering support for Shannon Dicus for appointment to the position for sheriff. Shannon has demonstrated over the years the skill, leadership and, more importantly, the character for this appointment to sheriff.”
Former Undersheriff Richard Beemer said he supported Dicus.
Though Sheriff McMahon pointedly did not participate in Wednesday’s forum and he made no public endorsement of any of the applicants, his support of Dicus was evident by many measures. One of those is that last week, he elevated Shelley Krusbe, Dicus’s wife, who was formerly the captain heading the department’s specialized investigations division, to the department’s seventh deputy chief position.
In his remarks to the board, Dicus essentially claimed McMahon’s endorsement, saying “I’ve been extremely fortunate to be mentored by Sheriff John McMahon.”
Dicus also sought to and did score points with the board of supervisors by alluding to the county’s strategic development and management plan, which is labeled “County Vision.”
“The County Vision has been at the forefront and a guiding principle for county government,” Dicus said. “We act in a manner that local government supports all of our citizens from cradle to career. I’ve been actively involved in the public safety element group since the County Vision concept has been adopted.”
Unspoken during the hearing was the damning information the department’s intelligence unit attached to the sheriff’s command echelon has picked up within the last six weeks pertaining to bribe money that has been filtered to Board of Supervisors Chairman and Fourth County Supervisor Curt Hagman, Third County Supervisor Dawn Rowe and Fifth District County Supervisor Paul Cook by former Board of Supervisors Chairman Bill Postmus, who was convicted in 2012 of 14 political corruption charges, including conspiracy, bribery, soliciting a bribe, receiving a bribe, public office conflict of interest, misappropriation of public funds, fraud and perjury. Postmus’s conviction on the public office conflict of interest charge prohibits him from holding elected public office in California for life. Nevertheless, he has remained active politically through the formation of a company, Mountain States Consulting Group, LLC, which is based in Wyoming and which he uses as a vehicle for laundering political contributions, bribes and kickbacks to public officials.
McMahon’s discovery of the bribery involving members of the board of supervisors, which came about the first week of June after he assigned investigators with his department to look into reports to that effect, was a factor in convincing him that the time for his retirement as sheriff was upon him. The information implicating Hagman, Rowe and Cook in the graft being vectored to public officials by Postmus remains in the possession of the sheriff’s department, giving Dicus a substantial degree of leverage over a majority of the board of supervisors, which gave him a lock on the appointment as sheriff.
While the board members were polite, deferential and even complimentary toward Dupper and Harris while they were interviewing them, after the hearing with regard to the sheriff succession was concluded, the board members made no pretense of considering either Dupper or Harris, gravitating immediately toward heaping praise upon Dicus and his qualifications for the sheriff’s post.
In short order Dicus was nominated as the next sheriff after which his appointment was unanimously confirmed.
Dicus will now join Robert Clift, Joseph Bridger, Valentine J. Herring, Charles W. Piercy, William Tarleton, Anson Van Leuven, E.M. Smith, J.A. Moore, Henry Wilkes, Benjamin F. Matthews, G.F. Fulgham, Newton Noble, A.J. Curry, William Davies, John C. King, J.B. Burkhart, Nelson Green Gill, John Albert Cole, Edwin Chidsey Seymour, James P. Booth, Francis L. Holcomb, Charles A. Rouse, John C. Ralphs, J.L. McMinn, Walter A. Shay, Ernest T. Shay, Emmett L. Shay, James W. Stocker, Eugene W. Mueller, Frank Bland, Floyd Tidwell, Richard G. Williams, Gary Penrod, Rod Hoops and McMahon on the roster of sheriffs of San Bernardino County who have held that position since 1853.
–Mark Gutglueck