FBN20260000060
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
HELLO VISIONARY SERVICE 12686 N BEND CT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739: PEI CHEN YEH
Business Mailing Address: 12686 N BEND CT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: January 5, 2026.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ PEI CHEN YEH, Owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 01/06/2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K7325
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 9, 16, 23 & 30, 2026.

FBN20250011999
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
LOOMIS 1715 CAPRI AVENUE MENTONE, CA 92359: CHERYL M ROGERS
Business Mailing Address: 1715 CAPRI AVENUE MENTONE, CA 92359
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ CHERYL M ROGERS
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 12/26/2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K8168
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 9, 16, 23 & 30, 2026.

FBN20250011746
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
MILEY’S ANGEL HOME CARE 16510 GALA AVE FONTANA, CA 92337: MILEY’S ANGEL HOME CARE LLC 16510 GALA AVE FONTANA, CA 92337
Business Mailing Address: 14649 DEER DR FONTANA, CA 92336
The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY registered with the State of California.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ MILAGROS AZUALA
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 12/16/2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy J1808
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 9, 16, 23 & 30, 2026.

FBN 20250011396
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
GLOBAL INVESTMENTS [and] GLOBAL WEALTH BUILDERS [and] COREWISE ACADEMY [and] CORNERSTONE GROUP [and] ASPIRVION [and] AFFLUENTOPIA 4195 CHINO HILLS PARKWAY, SUITE E-420 CHINO HILLS, CA 91709: GLOBAL TRANSFORMATION INVESTMENTS, INC. 4195 CHINO HILLS PARKWAY, SUITE E-420 CHINO HILLS, CA 91709
Business Mailing Address: 4195 CHINO HILLS PARKWAY, SUITE E-420 CHINO HILLS, CA 91709
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION registered with the State of California
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ ALISHA CHEN, CEO
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 12/08/2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K4616
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on December 12, 19 & 26, 2025 and January 2, 2026. Corrected on January 9, 16, 23 & 30, 2026

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: JAMES CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, SR.
CASE NO. PROVV2600016
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of JAMES CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, SR.: a petition for probate has been filed by JAMES CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, JR. in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION for Probate requests that JAMES CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, JR. be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held February 23, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. at
Superior Court County of San Bernardino
Department V12- Victorville
14455 Civic Dr.
Victorville, Ca 92392
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal de-livery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for James Christopher Mitchell, Jr.:
Jacob Hedtke, Esquire (California Bar Number 345333)
Estelle & Kennedy
367 N. Second Avenue
Upland, California 91786
Telephone (909) 608-0466 Fax No: (909) 608-0477
jacob@estellekennedylaw.com
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 16, 23 & 30, 2026.

FBN20260000145
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
ARROW DOG AND CAT HOSPITAL [and] ARROW DOG & CAT HOSPITAL [and] ARROW DOG & CAT VETERINARY HOSPITAL [and] GENERAL DOG & CAT HOSPITAL [and] ADVANCED PET CARE OF MONTCLAIR 5405 ARROW HWY SUITE 108 MONTCLAIR, CA 91763: GENERAL DOG & CAT VETERINARY HOSPITAL, INC. 215 CAMPBELL AVE REDLANDS, CA 92373
Business Mailing Address: 5405 ARROW HWY SUITE 108 MONTCLAIR, CA 91763
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION registered with the State of California.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: January 5, 2026.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ MARIAN M. HABIB, CEO
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 01/12/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy F3010
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 16, 23 & 30 and February 6, 2026.

FBN20250011678
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
DESTINY RENTAL 15370 CHOLAME RD #3 VICTORVILLE, CA 92391: ROSINA MENDIOLA
Business Mailing Address: 15370 CHOLAME RD #3 VICTORVILLE, CA 92391
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: December 15, 2025.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ ROSINA MENDIOLA, Owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 12/15/2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K1587 Hesperia
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 16, 23 & 30 and February 6, 2026.

FBN20260000210
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
THAT SOUL COACH 435 N 12th STREET UPLAND, CA 91786: SOUL LIFE COACHING LLC 435 N 12th STREET UPLAND, CA 91786
Business Mailing Address: 435 N 12th STREET UPLAND, CA 91786
The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY registered with the State of California under the number B20250352580
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ LAURIE JENKINS, CEO
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 01/14/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K4616
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 16, 23 & 30 and February 6, 2026.

FBN20260000153
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
TRUE CARE CHIROPRACTIC CENTER 1525 N D STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92405: BARRIGA CHIROPRACTIC, PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1525 N D STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92405
Business Mailing Address: PO Box 1752 RIALTO, CA 92377
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION registered with the State of California under the number B20250304400
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ GEORGINA BARRIGA ORTIZ, President
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 01/12/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K7326
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 16, 23 & 30 and February 6, 2026.

FBN20250012108
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
FOOTHILL MEDIA 7035 MENDOCINO PLACE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 90701: BRADLEY D BAKER
Business Mailing Address: 7035 MENDOCINO PLACE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 90701
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ BRADLEY D BAKER, Owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 12/30/2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy J6733
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 16, 23 & 30 and February 6, 2026.

FBN20260000332
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
GLOBAL BEAUTE 11799 SEBASTIAN WAY STE 103 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730: PATRICIA R TSAI [and] PATRICK W. TSAI
Business Mailing Address: 11799 SEBASTIAN WAY STE 103 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
The business is conducted by: A MARRIED COUPLE
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: JANUARY 10, 2026.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ PATRICIA R TSAI, Co-owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 01/16/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy J6733
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 16, 23 & 30 and February 6, 2026.

FBN20250011867
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
SALSAS MAMA ESTELA 14043 YORKTOWN CT FONTANA, CA 92336: ANGELICA GUTIERREZ
Business Mailing Address: 14043 YORKTOWN CT FONTANA, CA 92336
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: DECEMBER 18, 2025
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ ANGELICA GUTIERREZ, Individual
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 12/19/2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K4616
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 16, 23 & 30 and February 6 , 2026.

FBN20250011804
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
AVS DESIGN STUDIO 192 DORSET AVENUE UPLAND, CA 91786: ANDREA SAMANIEGO
Business Mailing Address: 192 DORSET AVENUE UPLAND, CA 91786
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: January 27, 2021
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ ANDREA SAMANIEGO , Owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 12/18/2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K3379
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 23 & 30 and February 6 & 13, 2026.

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF:
Brent Lynn Scott Case NO. PROVA2501001
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of Brent Lynn Scott A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by Christopher Scott in the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that The petition requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority., Christopher Scott be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held in Dept. F2 at 09:00 AM on 02/24/2026 at Superior Court of California, County of Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino Probate Division, , San Bernardino, 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, Probate Division
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
pro per:
311 E Avenue L Calimesa Ca 92320
Telephone No: (909)731-0946
Published in the SBCS Ontario on:
01/23/2026, 01/30/2026 , 02/06/2026

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: MARIA C. COREA
CASE NO. PROVA2600032
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of MARIA C. COREA:
A PETITION FOR PROBATE has been filed by REGINALDO TORRES HERNANDEZ in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that REGINALDO TORRES HERNANDEZ be appointed as personal representatives to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held in Dept. F-2 at 9:00 a.m. on March 9, 2026.
San Bernardino County Superior Court Fontana District
Department F2 – Fontana
17780 Arrow Boulevard
Fontana, CA 92335
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Reginaldo Torres Hernandez:
ANTONIETTE JAUREGUI (SBN 192624)
1894 COMMERCENTER WEST, SUITE 108
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408
Telephone No: (909) 890-2350
Fax No: (909) 890-0106
ajprobatelaw@gmail.com
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 23 & 30 and February 6, 2026.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
CASE NUMBER CIVSB2600258
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: Petitioner MELANIA APONTE LAUREANO filed with this court for a decree changing names as follows:
MELANIA APONTE LAUREANO to MELANIE ALONSO
THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
Notice of Hearing:
Date: March 4, 2026, Time: 09:00 AM, Department: S29
The address of the court is Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino District-Civil Division, 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be published in the SAN Bernardino County Sentinel in San Bernardino County California, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing of the petition.
Dated: January 21, 2026
Judge of the Superior Court: Gilbert G. Ochoa
By Sylvia Guajardo, Deputy Court Clerk
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 23 & 30 and February 6 & 13, 2026.

FBN20250011942
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
ALEXA’S BABY STORE 999 N WATERMAN AVE #B12 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92410: BERTHA ALVARADO
Business Mailing Address: 999 N WATERMAN AVE #B12 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92410
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ BERTHA ALVARADO, Owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 12/23/2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy F3010
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 23 & 30 and February 6 & 13, 2026.

FBN20260000004
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
TRUE PEST CONTROL 9350 THE RESORT PKWY, UNIT 1638 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730: MATTHEW A PAGE
Business Mailing Address: 9350 THE RESORT PKWY, UNIT 1638 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ MATTHEW A PAGE, Owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 1/02/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K9277
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 23 & 30 and February 6 & 13, 2026.

FBN20260000407
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
REALTY NEST GROUP 10788 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE SUITE 250/260 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730: SENTRY HOME LOANS INC. 10788 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE SUITE 250/260 RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
Business Mailing Address: 7056 ARCHIBALD AVE SUITE 102-318 CORONA, CA 92880
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION registered with the State of California.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ ALVARO CRUZ BARAJAS MALDONADO, President
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 1/21/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy F3010
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 23 & 30 and February 6 & 13, 2026.

FBN20260000261
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
SUGAR CLOUD COFFEE CO. 432 N AZALEA AVE ONTARIO, CA 91762: JOHANNA A SANCHEZ MORENO
Business Mailing Address: 432 N AZALEA AVE ONTARIO, CA 91762
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ JOHANNA A SANCHEZ MORENO
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 1/15/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy J9535
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 23 & 30 and February 6 & 13, 2026.

FBN20260000146
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
TERRA VISTA DENTAL CARE 7211 HAVEN AVE SUITE D RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701: RAJURKAR DENTAL INC 7211 HAVEN AVE SUITE D RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701
Business Mailing Address: PO BOX 9224 ALTA LOMA, CA 91701
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION registered with the State of California under the number B20250426072
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ SEJAL RAJURKAR, President
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 1/12/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy J6733
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 23 & 30 and February 6 & 13, 2026.

FBN20250011867
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
SALSAS MAMA ESTELA 14043 YORKTOWN CT FONTANA, CA 92336: ANGELICA GUTIERREZ
Business Mailing Address: 14043 YORKTOWN CT FONTANA, CA 92336
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: DECEMBER 18, 2025
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ ANGELICA GUTIERREZ, Individual
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 12/19/2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K4616
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 23 & 30 and February 6 & 13, 2026.

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: GARY FRED HARVEY
CASE NO. PROVA2600040
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of GARY FRED HARVEY: a petition for probate has been filed by NORAH ELIZABETH HARVEY in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that NORAH ELIZABETH HARVEY be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests the decedents will and codicils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held March 2, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. at
San Bernardino County Superior Court Fontana District
Department F1 – Fontana
17780 Arrow Boulevard
Fontana, CA 92335
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Norah Elizabeth Harvey:
R. SAM PRICE SB 208603
PRICE LAW FIRM, APC
454 Cajon Street
REDLANDS, CA 92373
Phone (909) 328 7000
Fax (909) 475 9500
attorneys@pricelawfirm.com
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 5 & 13, 2026.

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ABEL CESAR DOMINGUEZ
CASE NO. PROVA2600038
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of ABEL CESAR DOMINGUEZ: a petition for probate has been filed by MARY CARMEN CALDERON in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that MARY CARMEN CALDERON be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held March 2, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. at
San Bernardino County Superior Court Fontana District
Department F1 – Fontana
17780 Arrow Boulevard
Fontana, CA 92335
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Mary Carmen Calderon:
R. SAM PRICE SB 208603
PRICE LAW FIRM, APC
454 Cajon Street
REDLANDS, CA 92373
Phone (909) 328 7000
Fax (909) 475 9500
attorneys@pricelawfirm.com
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 5 & 13, 2026.

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: ROBERT LAWRENCE PORTER
CASE NO. PROVA2600072
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of ROBERT LAWRENCE PORTER: a petition for probate has been filed by ELNORA DELORES PORTER in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that ELNORA DELORES PORTER be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held March 17 2026 at 9:00 a.m. at
San Bernardino County Superior Court Fontana District
Department F2 – Fontana
17780 Arrow Boulevard
Fontana, CA 92335
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Elnora Delores Porter:
R. SAM PRICE SB 208603
PRICE LAW FIRM, APC
454 Cajon Street
REDLANDS, CA 92373
Phone (909) 328 7000
Fax (909) 475 9500
attorneys@pricelawfirm.com
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 5 & 13, 2026.

NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF: NANCY LYNN ROOTLAND
CASE NO. PROVA2600066
To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent creditors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of NANCY LYNN ROOTLAND: a petition for probate has been filed by MATTHEW ANTHONY ROOTLAND in the Superior Court of California, County of SAN BERNARDINO.
THE PETITION FOR PROBATE requests that MATTHEW ANTHONY ROOTLAND be appointed as personal representative to administer the estate of the decedent.
THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This authority will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority.
A hearing on the petition will be held March 12, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. at
San Bernardino County Superior Court Fontana District
Department F3 – Fontana
17780 Arrow Boulevard
Fontana, CA 92335
IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney.
IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the decedent, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within the later of either (1) four months from the date of first issuance of letters to a general personal representative, as defined in section 58(b) of the California Probate Code, or (2) 60 days from the date of mailing or personal delivery to you of a notice under Section 9052 of the California Probate Code.
Other California statutes and legal authority may affect your rights as a creditor. You may want to consult with an attorney knowledgeable in California law.
YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a Request for Special Notice (form DE-154) of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in Probate Code section 1250. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk.
Attorney for Matthew Anthony Rootland:
R. SAM PRICE SB 208603
PRICE LAW FIRM, APC
454 Cajon Street
REDLANDS, CA 92373
Phone (909) 328 7000
Fax (909) 475 9500
attorneys@pricelawfirm.com
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 5 & 13, 2026.

SUMMONS – (CITACION JUDICIAL)
CASE NUMBER (NUMERO DEL CASO) CIVSB2427251
NOTICE TO:
(AVISO DEMANDADO):
WESTERN APPLIANCES, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, FRONTIER INVESTMENT GROUP LLC, a California limited liability company; QG A4L, INC., a Nevada Corporation, APPLIANCE 4 LESS, SONGTAO MA an Individual; WEIJUN JIANG an Individual; and ROES 1-20
YOU ARE BEING SUED BY CROSS-COMPLAINANT:
(LO ESTÁ DEMANDANDO EL CONTRADEMANDANTE):
ORIENTAL APPLIANCE LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company; and DI ZHENG, an individual
NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below.
You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons is served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court.
There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court’s lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case.
¡AVISO! Lo han demandado. Si no responde dentro de 30 dias, la corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su version. Lea la informacion a continuacion
Tiene 30 DIAS DE CALENDARIO después de que le entreguen esta citación y papeles legales para presentar una repuesta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que se entreque una copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefonica no le protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar on formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulano que usted puede usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte y mas información en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov), en la biblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede mas cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentación, pida si secretario de la corta que le de un formulario de exencion de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corta le podrá quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin mas advertencia.
Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que llame a un abogado inmediatamente. Si no conace a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de referencia a abogados. Si no peude pagar a un a un abogado, es posible que cumpia con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratu de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services, (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www.sucorte.ca.gov), o poniendoso en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los costos exentos gravamen sobre cualquier recuperación da $10,000 o mas de vaior recibida mediante un aceurdo o una concesión de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corta antes de que la corta pueda desechar el caso.
The name and address of the court is: (El nombre y la direccion de la corte es):
San Bernardino County Superior Court
8303 Haven Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
SHORT NAME OF CASE (from Complaint): (Nombre de Caso): Western Appliances LLC -v – Di Zheng et al
CASE NUMBER: (Número del Caso): CIVSB2427251
The name, address and telephone number of plaintiff’s attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney, is: (El nombre, la direccion y el numero de telefono del abogado del demandante, o del demendante que no tiene abogado, es):
Elizabeth Yang, YLO,P.C.
199W.GarveyAve.,#201
Monterey Park, CA 91754.
T:877-492-645
e-mail: daniel@yanglawoffices.com
DATE (Fecha): October 10, 2025
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30, 2026 and February 6, 13 & 20, 2026.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME
CASE NUMBER CIVSB2600522
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: Petitioner SALMA AISHA BELTRAN filed with this court for a decree changing names as follows:
SALMA AISHA BELTRAN to SALMA AISHA GUZMAN
THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
Notice of Hearing:
Date: March 6, 2026 Time: 09:00 AM, Department: S23
The address of the court is Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino District-Civil Division, 247 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be published in the SAN Bernardino County Sentinel in San Bernardino County California, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing of the petition.
Dated: 1/23/2026
Judge of the Superior Court: Gilbert G. Ochoa
By Nuna Rivera, Deputy Court Clerk
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 6, 13 & 20, 2026.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME CASE
NUMBER CIVBA 2600034,
TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS: Petitioner Corinne Madison Reinhardt-Veldman, filed with this court for a decree changing names as follows: Corinne Madison Reinhardt-Veldman to Corinne Madison Veldman; Madison Taylor Veldman-Reinhardt to Madison Taylor Veldman; THE COURT ORDERS that all persons interested in this matter appear before this court at the hearing indicated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for change of name should not be granted. Any person objecting to the name changes described above must file a written objection that includes the reasons for the objection at least two court days before the matter is scheduled to be heard and must appear at the hearing to show cause why the petition should not be granted. If no written objection is timely filed, the court may grant the petition without a hearing.
Notice of Hearing:
Date: 02/27/2026, Time: 08:30 AM, Department: B1The address of the court is Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino, Barstow District, 235 E Mt. View Barstow, CA 92311, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be published in the SBCS Upland in San Bernardino County California, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date set for hearing of the petition.
Dated: 01/16/2026
Judge of the Superior Court: James R. Baxter
Published in the SBCS Upland on 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026, 02/13/2026, 02/20/2026

FBN20250012108
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
WEAR, TEAR, OR REPAIR [and] PI MAISON 14148 CALLE DOMINGO VICTORVILLE, CA 92392: PERFECTLY IMPERFECT MINISTRIES 14148 CALLE DOMINGO VICTORVILLE, CA 92392
Business Mailing Address: 14148 CALLE DOMINGO VICTORVILLE, CA 92392
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION registered with the State of California
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: December 15, 2025.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ CHIDIMMA RUTH EZE, Owner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 12/19/2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K4616
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 6, 13 & 20, 2026.

FBN20260000359
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
BURGER KING #2893 9710 CENTRAL AVENUE MONTCLAIR, CA 91763: LAOC BURGERS LLC 2551 WOODLAND DR ANAHEIM, CA 92801
Business Mailing Address: 2551 WOODLAND DR ANAHEIM, CA 92801
The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY registered with the State of California under the number 202461817048
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: JULY 9, 2025.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ JACOB BRUMMEL, Managing Member
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 1/16/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K4616
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 6, 13 & 20, 2026.

FBN20260000180
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
VIBEHIVE FOTONOOK [and] ASHSKY [and] REMIR [and] FRIER AND ICE 16490 BREEZY STREET FONTANA, CA 92336: IMPERIALBOBIS LLC 16490 BREEZY STREET FONTANA, CA 92336
Business Mailing Address: 16490 BREEZY STREET FONTANA, CA 92336
The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY registered with the State of California under the number 202463216208
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: JANUARY 13, 2026.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ SEPTEMBER IMPERIALBOBIS, President
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 1/13/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy L6733
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 6, 13 & 20, 2026.

FBN20260000599
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
BEAMCLICKS PHOTO BOOTH COMPANY [and] BEAMCLICKS [and] BEAMCLICKS PHOTO BOOTH CO 16490 BREEZY STREET FONTANA, CA 92336: IMPERIALBOBIS LLC 16490 BREEZY STREET FONTANA, CA 92336
Business Mailing Address: 16490 BREEZY STREET FONTANA, CA 92336The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY registered with the State of California
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ SEPTEMBER IMPERIALBOBIS, President
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 1/26/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K7326
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 6, 13 & 20, 2026.

FBN20260000510
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
PURLEND 4195 CHINO HILLS PKWY, SUITE 537 CHINO HILLS, CA 91709: PURPOSE TECHNOLOGY, INC 4195 CHINO HILLS PKWY, SUITE 537 CHINO HILLS, CA 91709
Business Mailing Address: 4195 CHINO HILLS PKWY, SUITE 537 CHINO HILLS, CA 91709
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION registered with the State of Delaware under the number B20260017437
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A.
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ DAVID KAWATA, Chief Executive Officer
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 1/23/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K2885
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 6, 13 & 20, 2026.

FBN20260000662
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
REDLANDS GOLDEN GROVES 10710 KING STREET REDLANDS, CA 92374: JOYCE JACOBS
Business Mailing Address: 10710 KING STREET REDLANDS, CA 92374
The business is conducted by: A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: JANUARY 26, 2016
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ EDWARD JACOBS, Partner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 1/28/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K9232
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 6, 13 & 20, 2026.

FBN20260000663
The following entity is doing business primarily in San Bernardino County as
PARK PROFESSIONAL PROPERTIES 10710 KING STREET REDLANDS, CA 92374: JOYCE JACOBS
Business Mailing Address: 10710 KING STREET REDLANDS, CA 92374
The business is conducted by: A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: JANUARY 26, 2016
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130). I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
/s/ EDWARD JACOBS, Partner
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: 1/28/2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy K9232
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on January 30 and February 6, 13 & 20, 2026.

FBN 20250010258
The following person is doing business as: ALEXI’SNACKS. 1524 MARJORIE AVE CLAREMONT, CA 91711;[ MAILING ADDRESS 1524 MARJORIE AVE CLAREMONT, CA 91711];
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
RUBEN MALDONADO OLIN
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ RUBEN MALDONADO OLIN, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: OCTOBER 28, 2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 11/07/2025, 11/14/2025, 11/21/2025, 11/28/2025 CNBB45202504MT CORRECTION DATES 12/12/2025, 12/19/2025, 12/26/2025, 01/02/2025

FBN 20250012036
The following person is doing business as: D/B/A MK TRADING. 1459 S EUCLID AVE APT #24 ONTARIO, CA 91762;[ MAILING ADDRESS 1459 S EUCLID AVE APT #24 ONTARIO, CA 91762];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
MARCELO ZAMORANO LARA
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ MARCELO ZAMORANO LARA, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: DECEMBER 29, 2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026 CNBB3202601MT

FBN 20260000015
The following person is doing business as: SPECTRUM CRANE SERVICE. 322 FELISA COURT REDLANDS, CA 92373;[ MAILING ADDRESS 322 FELISA COURT REDLANDS, CA 92473];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CHRISTOPHER W ST JEAN; CYNTHIA J ST JEAN
The business is conducted by: A MARRIED COUPLE.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ CYNTHIA J ST JEAN
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: JANUARY 02, 2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026 CNBB3202602MT

FBN 20260000012
The following person is doing business as: RICARDO V CHAUFFEUR. 12367 4TH ST SPC 28 YUCAIPA, CA 92399;[ MAILING ADDRESS 12367 4TH ST SPC 28 YUCAIPA, CA 92399];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
RICARDO VERGARA
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ RICARDO VERGARA, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: JANUARY 02, 2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026 CNBB3202603MT

FBN 20250011577
The following person is doing business as: HIGHLAND GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 1238 TURQUOISE AVE MENTONE, CA 92359;[ MAILING ADDRESS 1238 TURQUOISE AVE MENTONE, CA 92359];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
HIGHLAND GENERAL CONTRACTOR LLC 1238 TURQUOISE AVE MENTONE CA 92359 STATE OF ORGANIZATION CA
The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ FRANKSHUA MERLOS, CEO
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: DECEMBER 11, 2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026 CNBB3202604MT

FBN 20260000068
The following person is doing business as: WOLFPACK CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT. 255 OAK DR LAKE ARROWHEAD, CA 92352;[ MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX 90614 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92427];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
JASEN E MATTINGLY
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: JAN 04, 2026
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JASEN E MATTINGLY, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: JANUARY 07, 2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026 CNBB3202605MT

FBN 20260000072
The following person is doing business as: SEA MOSS GUMMIES. 9668 MILLIKEN AVE STE 104-253 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730;[ MAILING ADDRESS 9668 MILLIKEN AVE STE 104-253 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
AYAD J AL-OMRAN
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ AYAD J. AL-OMRAN
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: JANUARY 07, 2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026 CNBB3202606MT

FBN 20250011296
The following person is doing business as: 1123 GLENWOOD. 1123 GLENWOOD COUTY SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92407;[ MAILING ADDRESS 1123 GLENWOOD COURT SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92407];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
1123 GLENWOOD, INC. 1123 GLENWOOD COUTY SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92407STATE OF INCORPORATION CA ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION B20250364492
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ MIRIAM GONZALEZ, SECRETARY
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: DECEMBER 04, 2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 12/12/2025, 12/19/2025, 12/26/2025, 01/02/2026 CNBB50202507MT CORRECTION DATES 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026

FBN 20250010218
The following person is doing business as: EL RINCONCITO MICHOACANO. 26235 9TH ST #39 HIGHLAND, CA 92346;[ MAILING ADDRESS 26235 9TH ST #39 HIGHLAND, CA 92346];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
JOSE SALCIDO RODRIGUEZ; MA CRISTINA SALCIDO
The business is conducted by: A MARRIED COUPLE.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JOSE SALCIDO RODRIGUEZ, CO-OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: OCTOBER 27, 2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 10/31/2025, 11/07/2025, 11/14/2025, 11/21/2025 CNBB44202514MT CORRECTION DATES 12/12/2025, 12/19/2025, 12/26/2025, 01/02/2026 CORRECTION DATES 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026

FBN 20250011054
The following person is doing business as: MONTEREY MORTGAGE. 8608 UTICA AVE STE 220MM RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730;[ MAILING ADDRESS PO BOX 7614 REDLANDS, CA 92373];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CALIFORNIA HARD MONEY LENDER INC 8608 UTICA AVE STE 220MM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 STATE OF INCORPORATION CA
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ SUSAN E. FUENTES, PRESIDENT
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: NOVEMBER 26, 2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 12/05/2025, 12/12/2025, 12/19/2025, 12/26/2025 CNBB49202502MT CORRECTION DATES 12/12/2025, 12/19/2025, 12/26/2025, 01/02/2026 CORRECTION DATES 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026

FBN 20250011056
The following person is doing business as: CALIFORNIA HARD MONEY LENDER. 8608 UTICA AVE STE 220MM RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730;[ MAILING ADDRESS P.O BOX 7614 REDLANDS, CA 92373];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CALIFORNIA HARD MONEY LENDER INC 8608 UTICA AVE STE 220MM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 STATE OF INCORPORATION CA ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION 6367975
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ SUSAN E FUENTES, PRESIDENT
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: NOVEMBER 26, 2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 12/05/2025, 12/12/2025, 12/19/2025, 12/26/2025 CNBB49202512MT CORRECTION DATES 12/12/2025, 12/19/2025, 12/26/2025, 01/02/2026 CORRECTION DATES 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026

FBN 20250010227
The following person is doing business as: C&C PLOW. 1513 SHERIDAN RD SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92407;[ MAILING ADDRESS 1513 SHERIDAN RD SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92407];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
NEXT LEVEL LEGACY INC 1513 SHERIDAN RD SAN BERNARDINO CA 92407 STATE OF INCORPORATION CA ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION B20250177085
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ CHAD E. RATLIFF, CEO
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: OCTOBER 27, 2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 10/31/2025, 11/07/2025, 11/14/2025, 11/21/2025 CNBB44202512MT CORRECTION DATES 12/12/2025, 12/19/2025, 12/26/2025, 01/02/2026 CORRECTION DATES 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026

FBN 20250008565
The following person is doing business as: CHINA FOOT MASSAGE & WELLNESS CENTER. 1150 BROOKSIDE AVE, STE H REDLANDS, CA 92373;[ MAILING ADDRESS 1150 BROOKSIDE AVE, STE H REDLANDS, CA 92373
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO];
CHINA FOOT MASSAGE & WELLNESS CENTER 1150 BROOKSIDE AVE STE H REDLANDS CA 92373 STATE OF INCORPORATION CA ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION B20250263141.
The business is conducted by: A CO-PARTNERSHIP.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: SEP 11, 2025
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ MINGYANG WAN, CEO
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: SEPTEMBER 11, 2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 09/12/2025, 09/19/2025, 09/26/2025, 10/03/2025 CNBB37202502MT CORRECTION DATES 10/31/2025, 11/07/2025, 11/14/2025 & 11/21/2025 CORRECTION DATES 12/12/2025, 12/19/2025, 12/26/2025, 01/02/2026 CORRECTION DATES 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026

FBN 20250010283
The following person is doing business as: STRAINS; STRAINS ADELANTO. 11420 RANCHO RD ADELANTO, CA 92301;[ MAILING ADDRESS 11420 RANCHO RD ADELANTO, CA 92301];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STRAINS ADELANTO, LLC 11420 RANCHO RD ADELANTO CA 92301 STATE OF ORGANIZATION CA ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION B20250113027
The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ FATIMA ABDULLA, MANAGING MEMBER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: OCTOBER 29, 2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 11/28/2025, 12/05/2025, 12/12/2025, 12/19/2025 CNBB48202502MT CORRECTION DATES 01/16/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026

FBN 20260000148
The following person is doing business as: BAYEAS. 9520 7TH ST UNIT E RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730;[ MAILING ADDRESS 537 VERMONT ST ALTADENA, CA 91001];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ONESO INC 9520 7TH ST UNIT E RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 STATE OF INCORPORATION CA ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION 5107724
The business is conducted by: A CORPORATION.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: JUL 03, 2022
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ NANCY TYAU, CFO
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: JANUARY 12, 2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026, 02/13/2026 CNBB4202601MT

FBN 20250012118
The following person is doing business as: SAVINA’S CARGO & EXPRESS. 14384 IVY AVE FONTANA, CA 92335;[ MAILING ADDRESS 14384 IVY AVE FONTANA, CA 92335];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
EMMA W CABRERA
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ EMMA W CABRERA, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: DECEMBER 30, 2025
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026, 02/13/2026 CNBB4202602MT

FBN 20260000188
The following person is doing business as: SAVAGE CONSULTANT. 1486 N. MILLARD AVE #1 RIALTO, CA 92376;[ MAILING ADDRESS 1486 N. MILLARD AVE #1 RIALTO, CA 92376];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
EDDIE J SAVAGE
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ EDDIE J SAVAGE, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: JANUARY 14, 2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026, 02/13/2026 CNBB4202603MT

FBN 20260000406
The following person is doing business as: JANKY J’S CAR WASH & TOW. 721 N WATERMAN AVE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92410;[ MAILING ADDRESS 721 N WATERMAN AVE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92410];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
JALALE J LOVE
The business is conducted by: AN INDIVIDUAL.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ JALALE J LOVE, OWNER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: JANUARY 21, 2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026, 02/13/2026 CNBB4202604MT

FBN 20260000307
The following person is doing business as: L & R CLEANING SERVICES. 816 W HILL DR SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92407;[ MAILING ADDRESS 816 W HILL DR SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92407];
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
LETTY & ROSALBA CLEANING SERVICE LLC. 816 W HILL DR SAN BERNARDINO CA 92407 STATE OF ORGANIZATION CA ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION B20250349409
The business is conducted by: A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY.
The registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name or names listed above on: N/A
By signing, I declare that all information in this statement is true and correct. A registrant who declares as true information which he or she knows to be false is guilty of a crime (B&P Code 179130. I am also aware that all information on this statement becomes Public Record upon filing.
s/ ROSALBA CONCEPCION LOPEZ, MANAGING MEMBER
Statement filed with the County Clerk of San Bernardino on: JANUARY 16, 2026
I hereby certify that this copy is a correct copy of the original statement on file in my office San Bernardino County Clerk By:/Deputy
Notice-This fictitious name statement expires five years from the date it was filed in the office of the county clerk. A new fictitious business name statement must be filed before that time. The filing of this statement does not of itself authorize the use in this state of a fictitious business name in violation of the rights of another under federal, state, or common law (see Section 14400 et seq., Business and Professions Code).
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026, 02/13/2026 CNBB4202605MT

By Mark Gutglueck
In a bold move signaling it is siding with San Bernardino’s municipal establishment in its deepening political and legal contretemps with Seventh Ward Councilwoman Treasure Ortiz, the district attorney’s office on January 8 criminally charged her with two counts of illicit electronic eavesdropping.
Central to the case is Ortiz’s production last year of what she and her legal team allege is prima facie evidence establishing elements of the San Bernardino Police Department in coordination with current and former city officials violated U.S. Privacy Act and California Penal Code Sections 11105 and 13300-13305.
Notably, the evidence being adduced by the district attorney’s office against Ortiz – an audio recording of a conversation among Ortiz, then San Bernardino Sixth Ward Councilwoman Kimberly Calvin and San Bernardino Police Officers Association President Jose Loera which took place on August 15, 2024 and a separate conversation among Ortiz, San Bernardino-based Developer Scott Beard and San Bernardino Police Chief Darren Goodman that occurred on August 29, 2024 – is key evidence cited in Ortiz’s lawsuit against the city filed in November 2025.
Already within the community, there are variant perspectives forming and hardening with regard to whether the evidence in question implicates or vindicates Ortiz or whether it condemns or exonerates the city, the members of the city council who are locked in seemingly intractable disputes with Ortiz, the police department, its police chief, its officers and the union that represents them.
Moreover, the district attorney’s criminal filing appears to be setting the stage for a potential precedent-setting legal determination about the admissibility of evidence and whether the Constitutional protections guaranteed to citizens over the intrusion of government conversely extends to protect of government from intrusion by citizens. Continue reading →

In less than a month, there have been four killings, including three shootings, of local residents by San Bernardino County law enforcement officers.
Three of those occurred this week.
On Thursday, January 22, an officer-involved shooting took place in Riverside after San Bernardino County Sheriff’s officers, including detectives and deputies, attempted to apprehend Jaque Rabon, 23 of Loma Linda, whom the department referred to as a “high-risk” suspect. Those officers, including members of the department’s specialized enforcement division, had obtained a felony arrest warrant for Rabon, who had a history, according to the department, of “utilizing explosives and was reasonably believed to be armed.” The no-bail arrest warrant for Rabon was based on his alleged involvement in a robbery, assault with a semi-automatic firearm and being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm.
The attempted arrest, however, was not effectuated cleanly, and Rabon led the enforcement party on a pursuit through Riverside at around 10 a.m. The chase came to an end at the Tyler Mall, where the suspect led deputies into a parking lot at 3782 Tyler Street. A shoot-out took place and Rabon was killed.
The immediate vicinity of the parking lot where the shooting occurred was closed off to allow detectives with the Riverside Police Department to conduct an investigation into the shooting.
In addition to the Riverside Police Department’s inquiry, the California Department of Justice/Attorney General’s Police Shooting Investigation Team initiated an investigation in accordance with Assembly Bill 506 guidelines. Upon completion of the investigation, a report will be turned over to Department of Justice’s special prosecutions section within the criminal law division for independent review.
Roughly 12 hours before the shooting in Riverside, a Chino police officer shot and killed a man the Chino Police Department said shot at the officer during a traffic stop on Wednesday night, January 21. Continue reading →

Serious questions attend the manner in which the sheriff’s department allowed two extremely sociopathic and violent prisoners to share a single cell at the West Valley Detention Center in Rancho Cucamonga earlier this week, resulting in the violent death of one of them.
There is a suggestion that the men’s jailers may have subjected the older of the two prisoners – 38-year-old Zacarias Joseph Ruiz – to the presence of the younger – Isaiah Mark Bailon, 26 – as a form of extrajudicial gratuitous summary punishment because of the repulsive nature of some of the older man’s crimes.
As a consequence of his most recent go-round with the law, Ruiz, whose last known actual residence was listed as being in San Bernardino, had until his death on January 20 been incarcerated since May 5, 2025 after having been arrested that day at 11201 Benton Street in Loma Linda for being in unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia, trespassing on railroad property and refusing to leave property on which he was trespassing. He had pleaded not guilty to those charges but was also facing charges relating to domestic violence and issuing criminal threats charges from 2024 that he had failed to appear on. He remained in custody the entire time since May, and was listed as ineligible for bail while awaiting a mental health hearing.
Ruiz had a substantial number of criminal charges lodged against him going back more than two decades.
Since 2005, he had been charged with seven misdemeanors, which resulted in four convictions, including carrying a knife, vandalism, disturbing the peace and battery on a spouse. He was repeatedly – at least three times previous to his arrest in May of 2025 arrested and charged with trespassing but not convicted.
Ruiz was also convicted of three felonies, extending to two sexually-related offenses – unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor in which the perpetrator was over the age of 21 and the victim was under the age of 16, in 2011 and lewd or lascivious acts with a child aged 14 or 15, in 2016 – as well as assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury, for which he was charged in 2015 and convicted in 2016. Continue reading →

We are writing to formally express our strong opposition to the proposed establishment
Residential Care Facility-Addiction Recovery in our community;
Specifically, we are referring to Project# PRAF-2025-00003, proposed to be located at
6748 Coriander Drive in Oak Hills 92344. An application for an entitlement to establish the facility was filed on August 13, 2025 by Dr. Sulaiman Masood, who is represented by Tamara Soussan’
While we understand and respect the importance of rehabilitation programs and support for individuals seeking recovery, we believe this specific location is not appropriate due to serious safety and quality-of-life concerns for residents. Our neighborhood is a family-oriented community where children regularly ride bicycles, ride horses, play outside, and walk the streets. Many families chose to live here specifically because it is a quiet and safe environment away from establishments. We believe it is also important to note that a bus stop for the local elementary school is located directly in front of the above mentioned address.
Introducing a halfway house in this area raises significant concerns regarding increased crime, drug-related activity, loitering, and individuals wandering the streets. These risks would directly impact the safety of children and families who rely on the neighborhood being a secure place to live. Unfortunately, communities with similar facilities have experienced issues that place an additional burden on local residents and law enforcement. Because of the nature of being in an unincorporated area, emergency facilities are not close by and oftentimes emergency response times are longer than ideal. Continue reading →

Tom Schwab, whose prudent personality inhabited City Hall and became the embodiment of civic governance in Grand Terrace for 22 years, has died, 16 years after he left the helm of the city. He was 68 when he moved into eternity on December 13, 2025.
Born August 17, 1957 in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, Thomas Joseph Schwab was the third of four sons of James and Catherine “Kay” Schwab. James was a chief master sergeant with the Air Force who over his 32-year career served in military bases around the world, including in Japan, where he met Kay. Shaped by his 50 percent American/50 percent Japanese heritage and his itinerant family lifestyle that exposed him and his brothers Mike, Dan and Jim to life in Asia, England and multiple U.S. communities, including San Bernardino and Norton Air Force Base in his teen years. That led to his matriculation at California State University, San Bernardino, from which he graduated in 1979.
Immediately after graduation, Schwab became a full-time municipal employee, having landed a position as an accountant in the City of San Bernardino’s finance department. Three years later, he was hired as the finance director with the City of Porterville.
In 1984, Seth Armstead, a retired United States Air Force Colonel who had been his father’s commanding officer at Norton Air Fore Base and who had become Grand Terrace’s first city manager upon the city’s founding in 1978, tapped him to serve as finance director in Grand Terrace. In 1987 upon Armstead’s retirement, Schwab became city manager of the 3.5-square mile 9,400-population city.
He remained in that role for 22 years. Located in heights above Colton and San Bernardino, the community, which is positioned at the southernmost end of central San Bernardino County against the Riverside County frontier, grew and matured prior to its incorporation from an agricultural district into an upscale residential community that housed many of the successful entrepreneurs with businesses in Colton, San Bernardino and Rialto. Continue reading →

This month, the Redlands Lawn Bowling Club eclipsed the 103rd anniversary of its founding. The green where the sport first took place and root in Redlands yet exists, along with the historic structures built by the club, such that Redlands remains a venue for the pastime, which is a relative rarity in Southern California.
The bowling club, located on the grounds of Sylvan Park at 411 North University Street, was founded in 1923 by real estate developer Melvin L. Hooper with the assistance of Dr. Frank H. Folkins. That was two years after aficionados of the sport began playing the game on the same spot in Sylvan Park.
The Redlands Daily Facts ran an article on November 1, 1921 remarking that lawn bowling had been taking place at Sylvan Park over the two or three previous Saturdays, and crediting Melivin Hooper as instrumental in initiating the competitions.
Hooper, originally from Canada, fancied himself as a crack player.
The activity proved popular enough that competitions became regular events at Sylvan Park, which was proximate to the stone zanja, an aqueduct constructed by Spanish settlers more than a century previously.
There was already a lawn bowling club in Pasadena at the time. Led by Hooper, a group of Redlands residents formed what was the second long bowling club in Southern California, officially chartering the chapter on January 24, 1923.
Popular in Italy and other countries in Europe, the origin of lawn bowling is traced to ancient Egypt around 5,000 B.C. A relatively familiar form of the game existed in Rome, with the modern sport and its formal rules having been developed and refined in Britain, with the oldest surviving green in Southampton, England, dating to 1299. Continue reading →

Goodman told Ortiz and Beard he was in the course of preparing the case to be presented against Desrochers by compiling a report along with the evidence of how he had used the state law enforcement data base for an illegitimate purpose.
“I’m planning on going forward,” Goodman is heard saying. “The DA has already been notified – not the DA but the DA’s office – and they know this is coming and I wanted to preface it with them because of the whole concern about the statute of limitations and I said, ‘Hey, look, I think this is different because we just discovered it’ and they said, ‘Yeah, you might be right and there may actually be some exceptions because there is a lot of new law based on use of technology and use of information from criminal databases.’ So, we’re hoping that they see it that way once it gets there and they see the entirety of the report.”

A little more than two months later, in the November 2024 run-off against Penman, Ortiz registered a relatively convincing 11.5 percent victory to capture the Seventh Ward council position, capturing 3,929 votes or 55.78 percent to Penman’s 3,115 votes or 44.22 percent.
The following month, with the installation of the three new members of the council, Ortiz among them, Mayor Tran was hoping to form a consensus on the council that would allow her to log more achievements in the second two years of her first mayoral term that would serve to convince the city’s voters to grant her a second term. Initially, there was not just a show of but actual bonhomie on the council dais that created the perception that Tran’s hoped-for formula of granting each of the council members an opportunity to bring back to their districts go-ahead on projects or programs to benefit their constituents while creating an atmosphere of cooperation that would facilitate her achieving broader objectives for the city as a whole.
At the public level, it is unknown whether Ortiz in closed-session discussions sought to convince her colleagues to in some fashion address the police department’s interference in the Seventh Ward election or if in making such a request she dwelt on the police department’s opposition to some of their electoral efforts, including bankrolling and orchestrating campaigns against Shorett and Ibarra, which likewise involved some underhanded tactics.
By March, the prosecution of Desrochers that Loera encouraged Ortiz to involve herself in and which Goodman had suggested was to be forthcoming had not manifested. Concerned that the issue, which had already been pushed to the back burner, would soon be taken off the stove completely, Ortiz filed a claim against the city on March 28, 2025, filed a $2 million claim against the city over the incident, asserting a detective had accessed the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System to obtain information relating to her and then allowed that data to be used in the campaign against her.
On May 5, without Ortiz participating, city council voted 6-to-0 to reject the claim. Shortly after the council vote, Mayor Tran publicly stated the claim was “frivolous, filed in bad faith, dishonest and an attempt to swindle the City of San Bernardino out of $2 million. The city’s review of this matter determined that the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System, also known as CLETS, was lawfully accessed by authorized law enforcement personnel in March of 2020,”
Tran did not stop there. “In her initial report of the matter to Chief Goodman and in numerous social media posts and recorded videos she stated that she has never been arrested,” Tran said. “Following a thorough review of facts and circumstances surrounding the original report to Mr. Goodman and the claim that she filed, the city finds the information in the claim to be false and dishonest.”
In social media postings, Ortiz referenced Goodman’s August 29, 2024 statements and Loera’s August 15, 2024 statements, quoting some of them verbatim.
The city responded by disputing that the police chief and police union president had stated that officers had acted illegally or that members of the police department had misused the law enforcement data bases available to them. The city issued a public warning to Ortiz that further assertions of the type contained in her claim would lead to charges against her for filing a false police report.
Ortiz then went directly to the district attorney’s office, marshaling what evidence she had and providing investigators with the audio recordings of the exchanges with Loera and Goodman at the August 15, 2024 and August 29, 2024 meetings.
On November 5, 2025, Peter Schlueter, an attorney based in Grand Terrace, filed on Ortiz’s behalf a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles alleging the police union acted improperly and illicitly in accessing the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System and applying that information in a falsified context to derive the October 2023 “survey,” which was a poorly-disguised political attack piece targeting her. The suit cited the November 8, 2023 meeting with Penman in which he said the San Bernardino Police Officers Association would carry out a blistering campaign against her if she did not get out of the race, along with both Loera’s and Goodman’s acknowledgments that the CLETS file on her had been accessed. The lawsuit included quotes of Goodman taken from the audio recording of his August 29, 2024 meeting with Ortiz and Beard.

According to the lawsuit, Ortiz’s intention to seek election in the 7th Ward was generally known in San Bernardino and a consensus had formed among the members of the San Bernardino Police Officers Association and the San Bernardino Police Officers Management Association to support Penman in his run for the 7th Ward post. The police union’s determination to keep her out of office resulted in the union publicly disseminating confidential and sequestered information from government files that are maintained for identification and specified investigative purposes which Desrochers had accessed in his capacity as a detective with the department, which crossed the legal line.
The city responded by hiring attorney Stephen Larson, a former federal judge, to handle its defense of the lawsuit.
The city issued a statement that “An independent investigator hired by the City of San Bernardino confirmed that no one conducted an illegal search of the CLETS system, which is heavily regulated and audited annually by the State of California Attorney General’s Office.” In a joint statement, Mayor Tran and the city council characterized the Ortiz lawsuit as a complete misrepresentation of the facts and an unfair disparagement of city employees and officials in an attempt to obtain millions in taxpayer dollars from the city.

In the weeks following the lawsuit’s filing, to press inquiries, city officials declined to specify who the independent investigator was, refused to release the investigator’s report, said they could not clarify whether the investigator’s inquiry had taken place before or after Ortiz filed her claim against the city in March or before or after the lawsuit was filed and could not offer any definitude with regard to whether the investigator had been provided with the statements made by Chief Goodman in his exchange with Ortiz and Beard on August 29, 2024 or the chief’s text messages with Ortiz on August 14, 2024 or whether the investigator considered or had been provided with the statement made by Loera to Ortiz and Calvin on August 15, 2024.

On January 8, the contretemps between the City of San Bernardino and Ortiz plummeted to a yet greater depth when the district attorney’s office seemingly leapt to the city’s defense filed a criminal case against her alleging she had recorded conversations with members of the police department without their knowledge or consent in violation of California Penal Code Section 632(a). The filing, while making no direct mention of Goodman or Loera by name, referenced August 15, 2024 and August 29, 2024 as the dates of the offenses.

The filing remained publicly unremarked, but on January 21, during the first regularly scheduled council meeting of the month, with Councilwoman Kim Knaus as mayor pro tem presiding over the meeting in the absence of Mayor Tran, Deputy City Attorney Albert Maldonado made mention of the criminal filing in reporting on issues discussed during the board’s closed-door discussion prior to the public portion of the meeting. The issue that had been agendized for that closed session discussion was Ortiz’s lawsuit against the city. Maldonado reported that the council had voted 5-to-0 to release an apparently previously prepared press release relating to the criminal charges against Ortiz. He then read the press release, which announced that the district attorney’s office had filed made a criminal filing against Ortiz for allegedly violating Penal Code Section 632(a), engaging in the nonconsensual recording of or eavesdropping on confidential communications. Continuing to quote from the press release, Maldonado then, without explaining the statements Ortiz had recorded contradicted the city’s contentions, read, “Previously, Councilmember Ortiz filed a federal lawsuit against the City of San Bernardino seeking over $2 Million dollars in damages for what she asserts was an illegal search of the CLETS system in March 2019.  An independent investigator hired by the City of San Bernardino confirmed that no one conducted an illegal search of the CLETS system, which is heavily regulated and audited annually by the State of California Attorney General’s Office. Based on the independent investigation, Mayor Tran and the city council characterized the Ortiz lawsuit as a complete misrepresentation of the facts and an unfair disparagement of city employees and officials in an attempt to obtain millions in taxpayer dollars from the city.” 

Redoubled efforts by the Sentinel to obtain from the city a copy of the independent investigator’s report was rebuffed as was a request that the city identify the investigator. According to city spokesman, the investigation was conducted by a “highly qualified, experienced, and independent firm to review and investigate the allegations.” The city was unwilling to say whether Goodman and Loera had been interviewed by the firm and how the firm had reconciled the statements Goodman and Loera had made on the audio recordings Ortiz is now accused of illegally obtaining and the conclusion that “no one conducted an illegal search of the CLETS system.”

“At this time, the city will offer no further comment on the criminal matter which is the responsibility of the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office.”

The District Attorney’s Office, officially, is proving equally tight-lipped, indicating it will be making no public utterances with regard to the case, and is to confine its provision of information relating to Case No. 2026-00-0000627 People vs. Ortiz to court filings.

Thus, the Sentinel was rebuffed in its efforts to learn whether the prosecution has familiarized itself with the federal lawsuit filed by Schlueter on Ortiz’s behalf, whether the prosecution had considered the statements by the city denying that the illicit accessing of the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System vis-à-vis Ortiz had taken place, whether the district attorney’s office has reached a conclusion as to whether Desrochers was acting legally or illegally in accessing that material, if prosecutors had ascertained whether the San Bernardino Police Department was engaged in a legitimate criminal investigation of Ortiz when it pulled the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System file relating to her and what crime or crimes potentially perpetrated by Ortiz were being investigated. Similarly, the Sentinel was unable to wring from the district attorney’s office what individuals beyond Ortiz, Calvin and Beard it had contacted in looking into the allegations of illegal eavesdropping and recording. The district attorney’s office, likewise, was unable to offer an explanation as to why it had fixated upon Ortiz as the perpetrator of the Penal Code Section 632(a), despite the physical presence of Calvin and Beard at Ortiz’s meetings with Loera and Goodman in August 2024. Prosecutors were unable or unwilling to respond to how, precisely, the district attorney’s office reached the conclusion that Calvin and Beard were not responsible or involved in the recordings and why they had not been criminally charged.

According to Schlueter, the criminal theory against Ortiz will not endure, as the assertion that Ortiz made the recordings without Loera’s and Goodman’s knowledge and therefore implied consent will not hold up.

“The conversations were not meant to be confidential,” Schlueter maintains. “They discussed evidence of a crime by a third party and statements made to law enforcement can be used in a criminal case. The participants knew the plaintiff was recording the conversation.”

To be sure, the criminal case the district attorney’s office is bringing against Ortiz is fraught with omnidirectional danger.

Insofar as Ortiz is concerned, while Penal Code Section 632(a) is a misdemeanor rather than a felony, it yet stands as an illegal act, and two convictions for committing a crime in which she violated the privacy rights of two law enforcement officers, including the chief of the police department of the city she represents on the city council, will hardly increase her electability as councilwoman or to any other office she may seek. The recordings of Loera’s and Goodman’s utterances, which she willingly and purposefully provided to the district attorney’s office are the most damning evidence against her. If those tapes do not project the voices of Loera and/or Goodman explicitly consenting to be recorded, the prosecution will be in a position to say, ipso facto, that Ortiz intruded on their privacy in much the same fashion that Desrochers intruded on hers. Added to this is that the witnesses to be arrayed against her are all law enforcement officers, to whom juries in general and juries in San Bernardino County give especial credibility, officers who as part of their training are taught to testify in a way that will leave a jury convinced that they are on the side of justice. More difficult still, the prosecution’s star witness is not to be just any officer but rather San Bernardino’s chief of police, Darren Goodman, whose reputation proceeds him. Perhaps most importantly, Ortiz is being prosecuted by a district attorney’s office headed up by Jason Anderson, a politician himself who was a councilman in Ontario two decades ago, prior to being elected district attorney, who is well known for his reluctance to prosecute his fellow and sister politicians, so much so that despite the level of corruption throughout the county in which well over a score of elected officials have immersed themselves, virtually no or very few officeholders and only those at odds with the political establishment have been prosecuted under his watch. That he has set his office’s sights on Ortiz is a sure sign that he is not faffing about and will bring everything he has to bear to gain a conviction.

For both Goodman and Loera, the prosecution of Ortiz is fraught with the potential that they singly or dually will be confronted on the witness stand with the glaring contradiction between what they said in their August 2024 exchanges with Ortiz and her associates and what the city is now saying and what the city maintains they are now saying. Goodman and less prominently Loera are being cited by the city in its narrative that Ortiz and her attorney fabricated the accusation that the police department had made illegal use of the criminal information databases at its disposal out of whole cloth and that whatever investigation the police department might have engaged in with regard to Ortiz was based on probable cause, legitimate suspicion and perhaps actual wrongdoing or criminality on her part. The city is staking its position and its defense of the civil suit brought by Ortiz on the credibility, integrity, propriety and honesty of Desrochers, whom both Goodman and Loera disparaged as having engaged in wrongdoing and being worthy of prosecution. Goodman in the run-up toward the 2024 election grew accommodating of Ortiz, who had yet to be elected but ultimately would be, and accorded her the respect reserved for the city’s established officeholders. She utilized that opportunity to seize information that has the potential of fully manifesting as a legal and reputational disaster for the city. Despite Ortiz’s electoral success in 2024, she was never on a trajectory to be granted entrée into the political establishment in San Bernardino. This political tone deafness on Goodman’s part, depending on how the prosecution of Ortiz and her lawsuit against the city hash out, could create an atmosphere in which his remaining as police chief would be inconceivable.

The city has as much riding on the prosecution of Ortiz as anyone or any entity. Despite the fiction that there is a firewall between the city’s legal battle with Ortiz and the district attorney’s office’s prosecution of her, the latter grew out of the circumstances of the former. Based on both circumstance and the strength of the evidence Ortiz and her lawyer have cultivated, the city has been reduced to its best shot at Ortiz being a single bullet in the district attorney’s gun. If Anderson shoots too high or too low and misses, Ortiz will emerge not mortally wounded or even injured but stronger.

Anderson and the district attorney’s office have gone out on a limb, calculating that Ortiz and her legal team a) will not have the staying power to see both the civil and criminal cases through to the end; b) the criminal defense expertise to prevent Ortiz from being overwhelmed by what is being thrown at her and c) allow the case to be manipulated into a courtroom and before a judge who will allow what is, after all, a less than earth-shattering misdemeanor case to be tried along the very limited parameters of the charges against and prima facie evidence against her and prevent the defense from presenting or the jury from considering any contextual background to the case, which the prosecution is prepared to argue is irrelevant to the substance of the charges.

There is a perception alive in the San Bernardino County community that Anderson’s filing of the two Penal Code Section 632(a) charges against Ortiz is a means to an end that is based more on a political agenda than protecting the public. Illegally recorded conversations are generally inadmissible in legal proceedings. By obtaining a conviction against Ortiz on the Penal Code Section 632(a) charges, legal experts have said, Anderson would effectively prevent Schleuter from using the August 2024 recordings of Loera and Goodman in Ortiz’s civil trial against the city. Handicapping Schlueter in such a way that the lawsuit was dismissed would further ingratiate Anderson with the political establishment in the county seat. Nevertheless, if Schlueter is able to find an alternate way of illustrating to the jury the contradiction between the attitude Goodman and Loera had with regard to Desrochers’s use of the department’s law enforcement database in August 2024 and the position the city is taking with regard to his activity now, the city’s chances of successfully defending against Ortiz’s lawsuit would diminish. Anderson’s failure to obtain a conviction of Ortiz while simultaneously subjecting Goodman and Loera to a defense cross examination that leaves them in the positions of having to explain the diametrically different characterizations of Derochers’ guilt and innocence when talking with Ortiz in 2024 and in their statements since that time as they have been called upon to shore up the city in defending against the councilwoman’s suit could prove damaging to not just their credibility but that of their department. Anderson’s success as a prosecutor hinges largely on the credibility of the police officers who gather evidence and testify in support of convicting the defendants they arrest.

The case is an extraordinary one from multiple perspectives and presents, potentially, a forum for the testing of a basic constitutional issue.

Penal Code Section 632(a) prosecutions historically were relatively rare, but have become more frequent in recent years because of the easy and widespread availability of recording devices, in particular the availability of smartphone recording technology. The vast majority of Penal Code Section 632(a) prosecution grow out contentious domestic or workplace disputes and in the context of civil litigation. The case against Ortiz presents a wrinkle in that it involves a civilian recording the words of two law enforcement officers rather than other civilians. This is taking place at a time and in an environment in which police personnel in general have been armed with bodyworn video and audio recording devices. To accommodate this trend, there are cut-outs in the law which except law enforcement officers, essentially, from laws and statutes such as Penal Code Section 532(a), and law enforcement personnel are not required to obtain consent to activate their recording devices from those they encounter to function in the field and in their interaction with the public.

Arguments that have been made by the representatives of local government, police departments and various agencies law enforcement and otherwise in defending the ubiquitous and continuous unannounced used of bodyworn recording devices by government officials are manyfold. One is that they are used to provide evidence or information relating to the commission of a crime or crimes. Another is that they are being responsibly and sensibly used by responsible individuals who are acting in accordance with legal authority and that the product of the recording capability is used to determine truth in circumstances where there are conflicting accounts among those present or participating in action that is of social consequence. What Ortiz’s case presents is a stark question as to whether the 14^th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is indeed applicable in San Bernardino. The 14^th Amendment mandates that individuals in similar situations be treated equally by the government. She is now confronted by a situation in which there is now a dispute as to what was true and actually occurred when she was on a hunt to determine whether there had indeed been a violation of the law, such that the city is maintaining that Detective Desrochers did not illegally and without requisite purpose seek and obtain her profile from the statewide database available to the police department. She utilized a recording device to obtain evidence relating to that alleged or suspected crime from Chief Goodman and Police Officers Association President Loera. The question will become, if Schleuter has the inclination, patience and perseverance to pursue it, whether, under the 14^th Amendment, citizens such as Ortiz are to be permitted to ferret out the truth in the same way that agents of the government such as Goodman and Loera are empowered, and whether citizens should be given license to utilize tools such as an audio recorder in arriving at that truth.

Before the Federal Court for the Central District of California takes up that question to be appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, the case against Ortiz might turn on another issue.

Ortiz might reasonably anticipate that if the court takes up the question of whether she did or did not inform Loera and Goodman that she was recording them and it comes down to her word against theirs, the court will side with the two sworn professional police officers. Still, it might not be that simple.

On August 14, 2024, among the text messages that went back and forth between Ortiz and Goodman was one relating to Goodman’s audit of the CLETS database and the file therein pertaining to Ortiz which Detective Desrochers had accessed, which began at 10:39 a.m and ended at 10:41 a.m.:

Ortiz: “I would just like to pick up a copy of the full audit. Do you need anything from me for filing against the guy who did it?”

Goodman: “Yes, we will need statements from you. I have a detective working the case against the former officer.”

The next morning, Goodman texted Ortiz, telling her he was setting up a meeting between her and Loera, and encouraging her to make the meeting.

There is room to interpret the police department’s invitation to Ortiz to participate in an exchange of information with department members regarding a matter the department was investigating as giving her clearance to document what was said during the exchanges she was to have with those officers. It is possible, if not likely, that when Ortiz goes to trial, her attorney will make an argument that was the case and request that the judge hearing the matter instruct the jury to consider the question of whether Goodman asking her to meet with the department’s officers constituted consent to record the exchanges before rendering a verdict.