NOTICE OF SALE OF VESSEL
Notice is hereby given the undersigned will sell the following vessel and trailer at lien sale at said address below on: 02/17/2023 9:00 am
VESSEL
68B202X 06 ELIM ELBD0268B202 CA
TRAILER
5DBUP32382R000014 06 EXTR 155354X
DATE OF SALE- 05/12/2023
TIME OF SALE-09:00 AM
To be sold by JV MOTORSPORTS 1744 S WILLOW AVE RIALTO CA 92376
Said sale is for the purpose of satisfying lien for together with costs of advertising and expenses of sale.
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on April 28, 2023.

NOTICE OF SALE OF VESSEL
Notice is hereby given the undersigned will sell the following vessel and trailer at lien sale at said address below on: 02/17/2023 9:00 am
VESSEL
CF43179 21 YAMAHA YAMA0183H021 CA
DATE OF SALE- 05/12/2023
TIME OF SALE-09:00 AM
To be sold by JV MOTORSPORTS 1744 S WILLOW AVE RIALTO CA 92376
Said sale is for the purpose of satisfying lien for together with costs of advertising and expenses of sale.
Published in the San Bernardino County Sentinel on April 28, 2023.

SUMMONS – (CITACION JUDICIAL)
CASE NUMBER (NUMERO DEL CASO) CIVSB2101620
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT:
(AVISO DEMANDADO):
ESTATE OF HARRY S. COONEN, the Testate and Intestate Successors of HARRY S. COONEN, Deceased, and ALL PERSONS CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER SUCH DECEDENT; ESTATE OF MAX COONEN, the Testate and Intestate Successors of MAX COONEN, Deceased, and ALL PERSONS CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER SUCH DECEDENT; Additional Parties Attachment form is attached; ESTATE OF SIDNEY WEINBERG, the Testate and Intestate Successors of SIDNEY WEINBERG, Deceased, and ALL PERSONS CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER SUCH DECEDENT; ESTATE OF SONDRA HERRERA, the Testate and Intestate Successors of SONDRA HERRERA, Deceased, and ALL PERSONS CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER SUCH DECEDENT; RICARDO HERRERA, an individual; MIMI HERRERA-PEASE, an individual; DEANNA HERRERA, an individual; BENJAMIN COONEN, an individual; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE
YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF:
(LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE):
CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.
NOTICE! You have been sued. The court may decide against you without your being heard unless you respond within 30 days. Read the information below.
You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons is served on you to file a written response at this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your written response must be in proper legal form if you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your response. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), your county law library, or the courthouse nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning from the court.
There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may want to call an attorney referral service. If you cannot afford an attorney, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the California Legal Services Web site (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), the California Courts Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement or arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court’s lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case.
¡AVISO! Lo han demandado. Si no responde dentro de 30 dias, la corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su version. Lea la informacion a continuacion
Tiene 30 DIAS DE CALENDARIO después de que le entreguen esta citación y papeles legales para presentar una repuesta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que se entreque una copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefonica no le protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tiene que estar on formato legal correcto si desea que procesen su caso en la corte. Es posible que haya un formulano que usted puede usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formularios de la corte y mas información en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California (www.sucorte.ca.gov), en la biblioteca de leyes de su condado o en la corte que le quede mas cerca. Si no puede pagar la cuota de presentación, pida si secretario de la corta que le de un formulario de exencion de pago de cuotas. Si no presenta su respuesta a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corta le podrá quitar su sueldo, dinero y bienes sin mas advertencia.
Hay otros requisitos legales. Es recomendable que llame a un abogado inmediatamente. Si no conace a un abogado, puede llamar a un servicio de referencia a abogados. Si no peude pagar a un a un abogado, es posible que cumpia con los requisitos para obtener servicios legales gratu de un programa de servicios legales sin fines de lucro. Puede encontrar estos grupos sin fines de lucro en el sitio web de California Legal Services, (www.lawhelpcalifornia.org), en el Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www.sucorte.ca.gov), o poniendoso en contacto con la corte o el colegio de abogados locales. AVISO: Por ley, la corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuotas y los costos exentos gravamen sobre cualquier recuperación da $10,000 o mas de vaior recibida mediante un aceurdo o una concesión de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tiene que pagar el gravamen de la corta antes de que la corta pueda desechar el caso.
The name and address of the court is: (El nombre y la direccion de la corte es):
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
247 WEST THIRD STREET,
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92415-0210
The name, address and telephone number of plaintiff’s attorney, or plaintiff without an attorney, is: (El nombre, la direccion y el numero de telefono del abogado del demandante, o del demendante que no tiene abogado, es):
MALCOLM CISNEROS
2112 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE,
IRVINE, CA 92612
Telephone: (949) 252-9400
DATE (Fecha): February 1, 2021
Clerk (Secretario), by Anai Cortez-Ramirez
Published in the SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SENTINEL on: April 7, 14, 21 & 28, 2023.

Continue reading →

More than a year after intensive in-depth hearings into the drafting of water from Strawberry Canyon at the roughly 4,200-foot-to-5,400-foot elevation in the San Bernardino National Forest, the State Water Resources Control Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency have issued a tentative ruling that Blue Triton Brands has no water rights and must discontinue its removal of water at the upper reaches of the canyon.
For the time being, it appears, Blue Triton will be allowed to withdraw water from the lower reaches of the canyon and provide it to the San Manuel Indian Tribe and use it for its Arrowhead Spring Water bottling operation. The State Water Resources Control Board and the California Environmental Protection Agency nevertheless said that the water board’s enforcement division could at this point seek a cease and desist order against BlueTriton to prevent it from drafting water from the springs located mid-canyon and that they could not rule out that a ruling barring that diversion would be granted.
The issued ruling is not final and the public and all parties who provided input during the hearing last year will have an opportunity to offer comment until early next month. Continue reading →

By Mark Gutglueck
San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department higher-ups and some informed governmental officials throughout the county are tense with anxiety and uncertainty over the degree to which the most closely guarded files the department keeps have been compromised.
There is no doubt that an entity or entities unknown hacked the department’s computer system. Unclear is whether the hackers were able to download the entirety of the data bases they linked to. Moreover, some mystery attends if, given the degree of sophistication those black hats needed to have been able to compromise the security systems which were defeated in the course of their break-in, they have reverse engineered, based on the data in their possession, the access protocol which is known by only a handful of department personnel and is needed to open the data fields hidden in parallel files which contain compromising information on hundreds of the San Bernardino County community’s most prominent citizens.
The department has authorized entering into a quarter million contract with a New York-based cybersecurity and data privacy firm to ascertain not only what information has been compromised but whether the hackers left behind any tell-tale electronic fingerprints that might allow the department or outside forensic investigators to determine who they are.
Nevertheless, the information in the possession of the hackers is so sensitive and so explosive that if they have already succeeded in unlocking it or can do so in the future, they will be in a position to ruin the public reputations of a cross section of county officialdom, blackmail the sheriff and his command staff as well as other high ranking county officials, including members of the board of supervisors and administrators, rendering themselves, if not invulnerable to, immune from prosecution or reprisal of any sort. Continue reading →

On July 6 and the days or even weeks that are to follow, American society will perhaps come to terms with the mass of contradictions and paradoxes that are Alan Hostetter, just as Allen Hostetter may at last come to terms with the mass of contradictions that are American society.
On that day, the case of the People of the United States vs. Alan Hostetter is scheduled to go to trial.
With the exception of Jacob Chansley, the Q-Anon Shaman wearing American flag facepaint and a horned Native headdress who carried a menacing-appearing spear when he boldly stormed past Capitol Police officers after breaking into the Capitol building before seating himself at the presiding officer’s chair where he penned a jeering note to then-Vice President Mike Pence,” Hostetter is perhaps the most notable – famous or infamous – of the more than 1,000 defendants charged by the U.S. Government with insurrection in, at and around U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. Hostetter certainly can make a claim to being the most fascinating of those criminally charged in the matter, which grows out of the conflicting, indeed what come across as strikingly schizophrenic – diametrically opposite and radically changeable – elements of his personality. Continue reading →

A local environmental group has filed a second lawsuit against the City of Ontario relating to its lease of property to the east of Ontario Airport where last month the city council gave approval of a plan to construct nine industrial buildings.
On December 23, 2021, the Ontario International Airport Authority unanimously approved a 55-year lease with CanAm Ontario LLC, a joint venture between the McDonald Property Group of Newport Beach and USAA Real Estate Co. of San Antonio, Texas for 197.85 of 216 acres the Ontario International Airport Authority owns east of Haven Avenue south of Airport Drive and north of Jurupa Avenue and west of Carnegie Avenue.
CanAm Ontario was chosen from among what the authority said were more than 4,800 potential bidders on the property.
In securing the exclusive ground lease right, CanAm agreed to make a non-refundable $10 million deposit, and is to pay the airport authority roughly $625 million between 2021 and 2086, with $275 million being paid over the first decade of the lease, through December 2031. Airport officials celebrated that aspect of the lease, indicating that not only will the currently fallow acreage between Airport Drive and Jurupa Avenue be transformed into industrial concerns including factories, warehousing, distribution facilities and other logistics elements, but the airport through the authority will directly receive millions of dollars to defray the cost of further airport improvements and underwrite the cost of operations.
No sooner had the lease been signed, however, than a collection of environmentalists, including those in the Pomona Valley Audubon Society, took note that the lease site, east of the runway, is habitat to rare small nesting burrowing owls. Continue reading →

Despite some miserable atmospheric conditions, Travis Snyder had a wonderful winter.
Snyder, the owner of Advantage Backhoes, a company he founded in 2007, true to his business’s name, had already put himself into an advantageous position by locating his company in Lake Arrowhead, Crestline and Blue Jay.
As such, Snyder had been able to obtain three years ago a $1.25 million contract with San Bernardino County and its public works division for the operation of equipment for snow removal, for the period running from October 27, 2020 through June 30, 2025.
In February, what has now become known as Blizzard of ’23 descended on Southern California, an unrelenting 11-day period in which San Bernardino County’s mountain communities in both the San Bernardino Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest/San Gorgonio Wilderness to the east and the San Gabriel and Angeles National Forest to the west were blanketed in snow drifts reaching or exceeding ten feet in depth.
The snow fell so rapidly that by the second day, cars parked in driveways, on the shoulders and sides of roads and in parking lots that had not been moved during that time were completely covered in snow and no longer visible, such that only those who knew their location were able to recognize they were there. Continue reading →

San Bernardino County will turn over to the Mexican Consulate in the county seat more than 1,100 artifacts and items now in the possession of the county museum.

Next Tuesday, April 25, the board of supervisors is set to consider a proposal by David Myers, the director of the San Bernardino County Museum in Redlands, that 1,57 objects be transferred into the custody of the Mexican government.

In a formal report to the board of supervisors postdated to April 25, Myers said he wanted the board’s permission to “transfer cultural objects affiliated with Mexico.”

According to Myers, “The museum proposes the transfer of 1,157 cultural objects, captured by 825 records, to the Government of Mexico via the Consulate of Mexico in San Bernardino. The material has substantial cultural significance to Mexico cultural patrimony and the objects are attributed to traditional and ancestral Mexican practices. In July 2021, the Museum approached the Consulate, requesting the potential repatriation of Mexican cultural objects in an act of good faith and relationship building. This transfer conforms to the museum’s collection management policy, approved by the board of supervisors on February 14, 2017, which allows for deaccessioning and transfer when ‘another institution is in a better position to care for the object.’ The transfer also conforms to the museum standards as an accredited museum to ensure that museum collections stewardship respects and acknowledges the cultural traditions and beliefs of nations and/or tribes whose artifacts and ethnographic objects have been housed at the museum.”

The Mexican Consulate is located at 293 North D Street in San Bernardino, across the street from the now shuttered San Bernardino City Hall and the still-active Vanir Tower.

Myers told the board, “The museum believes the Instituto Nacional de Arqueología e Historia (INAH, a federal branch) is best suited to manage the cultural material generated by its community and recommend[s] repatriation to the Mexican community. The consulate has a relationship with the Instituto Nacional de Arqueología e Historia, subject matter experts in archives and collections management. Instituto Nacional de Arqueología e Historia is a federal organization, founded in 1939, to guarantee the research, conservation, and protection of the archaeological and historical heritage of Mexico. In addition, Instituto Nacional de Arqueología e Historia oversees all archaeological sites and most of the museums in Mexico. This demonstrates the internal capabilities of Instituto Nacional de Arqueología e Historia in resuming the care of these objects or finding the appropriate place inside their museum system, as their government has amply illustrated both a robust and technically sound program of heritage stewardship.”

According to Myers, “Costs related to packaging objects in archival quality material will be below $2,000 and will be paid from the museum budget. There will be substantial long-term savings realized in future years because the San Bernardino County Museum’s collections care, conservation, and storage of these sensitive artifacts will no longer be necessary.”